Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:58:29.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whiggery, religion and social reform: the case of Lord Morpeth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Boyd Hilton
Boyd Hilton
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

M.P.s who supported the Grey, Melbourne, Russell and Palmerston governments were all described as ‘Liberals’ in contemporary registers such as those by Dod and McCalmont. However, historians have recently attempted to differentiate intellectually among these M.P.s, and in particular to sort out the liberals from the whigs. A difficulty here is that, in a period which was almost equally dominated by religious and ecclesiastical issues on the one hand and social and economic issues on the other, it appears that those politicians who were most ‘liberal’ in one context were least ‘liberal’ in the other. The subject of this article, Lord Morpeth, conformed to a type of ‘whig–liberal’ politician whose social policies were ‘whig’ rather than ‘liberal’, but who exemplified that tolerant approach to religious politics which has been termed ‘liberal Anglican’. It is possible to infer Morpeth's theological views from his many comments on sermons and devotional texts, and it appears that the best way to understand his religion (and its impact on his politics) is in terms, not of liberal Anglicanism, but of incarnationalism combined with a type of joyous pre-millenarianism (or jolly apocalypticism) not uncharacteristic of the mid nineteenth century. Reacting against the evangelical and high church revivals, yet sharing their piety and rectitude, Morpeth's incarnational religion represented an attempt to reconcile a theory of individual personality with ideas of community and brotherhood – to soften the ‘spiritual capitalism’ implied by ‘moderate’ Anglican evangelicalism, while retaining its emphasis on individual responsibility. Its secular equivalent was the type of ‘half-way’ social reform espoused by many whig-liberals in the third quarter of the century.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 829 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I am grateful to Lawrence Goldman, Eileen Groth, Colin Matthew, Jon Parry, David Thompson, and Alison Winter for their advice, to the Hon. Simon Howard for permission to quote from the Castle Howard MSS, and to Eeyan Hartley (Keeper of Archives) for his help in making these available.

2 Norman, Gash, Reaction and reconstruction in English politics 1832–1852 (Oxford, 1965), pp. 165–6.Google Scholar

3 Ian, Newbould, Whiggery and reform, 1830–41: the politics of government (Basingstoke and London, 1990), pp. 314–21.Google Scholar

4 Richard, Brent, Liberal anglican politics: whiggery, religion, and reform 1830–1841 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar; Peter, Mandler, Aristocratic government in the age of reform: whigs and liberals, 1830–1852 (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar

5 See also Kriegel, Abraham D., ‘A convergence of ethics: Saints and Whigs in British antislavery’, Journal of British Studies, 26 (1987), 424–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Brent, , Liberal anglican politics, pp. 108–9.Google Scholar

7 Parry, J. P., Democracy and religion: Gladstone and the Liberal party, 1867–1875 (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 57–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Extracts from journals kept by George Howard, earl of Carlisle, edited by Lascelles, Lady C. (1871), p. 181.Google Scholar

9 Yet his opposition to Hampden's appointment can probably be inferred from Melbourne to Althorp, 2 Mar. 1836, and Althorp to Brougham, 5 Mar. 1836, British Library, Althorp papers, H14, H19 (provisional references).

10 Brent, , Liberal anglican politics, p. 133.Google Scholar

11 Duncan, Forbes, The liberal anglican idea of history (Cambridge, 1952)Google Scholar; Cannon, Susan Faye, Science in culture: the early Victorian period (New York, 1978)Google Scholar; Wise, M. Norton (with Smith, Crosbie), ‘Work and waste: political economy and natural philosophy in nineteenth century Britain’, History of Science, 27 (1989), 263–301, 391–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and 28 (1990), 221–61.

12 Corsi, P., ‘The heritage of Dugald Stewart: Oxford philosophy and the method of political economy’, Nuncius, annali di storia della scienza, 2 (1987), II, 89–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Whately to Melbourne, 21 Feb. 1836, Lord Melbourne's papers, edited by Sanders, L. C. (1889), p. 502.Google Scholar

14 Brent, , Liberal anglican politics, pp. 178–80.Google Scholar

15 Arnold, T., History of Rome (3 vols., 1838–1843), 1, viii–ix.Google Scholar

16 Waterman, A. M. C., Revolution economics and religion: Christian political economy, 1798–1833 (Cambridge, 1991), p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 [Whately, R.], Letters on the church by an episcopalian (1826), pp. 190–2Google Scholar. Recent scholarship has confirmed Whately's authorship of this anonymous work. See Corsi, Pietro, Science and religion: Baden Powell and the anglican debate, 1800–1860 (Cambridge, 1988), p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Free trade, in the narrow sense of removing tariffs, was the least controversial of this policy triad. Although Normanby and Duncannon led a ‘whig’ protectionist movement against the repeal of the corn laws, the fact is that the vast majority of ‘Whigs’ and ‘Liberals’ supported repeal.

19 Mandler, , Aristocratic government, pp. 23–43, 170 and passim.Google Scholar

20 Ibid. p. 276.

21 Ibid. p. 277. See also Donald, Southgate, The passing of the whigs 1832–1886 (1962), p. 156Google Scholar; Russell, George W. E., A short history of the evangelical movement (1915), pp. 121, 136–7.Google Scholar

22 The 1994 vintage was called ‘Back to basics!’

23 While all twenty supported the 1832 reform bill more or less, only the ‘economic Whigs and liberal Anglicans’ advocated further parliamentary reform in the 1850s and 1860s. For them reform was a matter of rights, and on a par with nonconformist claims for equality. The ‘economic Liberals’ approached the problem from a utilitarian angle, however. They supported reform in 1831–2 because they believed that it would advance the cause of liberal economic policy (primarily retrenchment), but mainly opposed extensions of the franchise to the working classes in the 1850s and 1860s because they thought that this would jeopardize the cause of retrenchment. I am grateful to Dr Parry for discussions on this point.

24 Spring Rice to Napier, 15 Nov. 1830, Macvey Napier papers, British Library, Add. MS 34614, fo. 431.

25 Gray, Peter, ‘British politics and the Irish land question, 1843–1850’, Cambridge University Ph.D., 1992, p. 250, n. 29.Google Scholar

26 Drummond, Henry, A letter to Dr. Chalmers (1829)Google Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, The age of atonement: the influence of evangelicalism on social and economic thought, 1785–1865 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 13–16, 91–8, 211–15Google Scholar. The present author's decision in that book to label the two types of evangelicalism ‘moderate’ and ‘extreme’, while justified by virtue of their respective religious styles, was unfortunate because it implied that ‘extreme’ evangelicalism was an exaggerated version of ‘moderate’ evangelicalism; in fact, as the supporting analysis made clear, the two evangelicalisms were fundamentally different and mutually antagonistic.

27 Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 285–8.Google Scholar

28 For Beamish at his most apocalyptic, see A sermon on the necessity, nature, and end of watchfulness and prayer, especially at this time (1842), pp. 10–15, 26–33Google Scholar. For his influence on the 6th duke of Devonshire, see James, Lees-Milne, The bachelor duke: William Spencer Cavendish, 6th duke of Devonshire 1790–1858 (1991), pp. 124–6Google Scholar (where his initials are given incorrectly).

29 In 1839 Cowper wrote approvingly of Alexander Knox's ‘profound views’ and ‘fixed opinion that much progress cannot be made in mature religion without the exercise of the intellect upon the subject of revelation’. W. F. Cowper to 6th duke of Devonshire, 18 Oct. 1839, Devonshire Collections, Chatsworth, First Series, 1257.21/4166.

30 Burd, V. A., Ruskin, Lady Mount-Temple and the spiritualists: an episode in Broadlands history (1982), p. 9Google Scholar; Battiscombe, Georgina, Shaftesbury: a biography of the seventh earl 1801–1885 (1974), pp. 178, 249Google Scholar; Finlayson, Geoffrey B. A. M., The seventh earl of Shaftesbury 1801–1885 (1981), pp. 378–81.Google Scholar

31 Mount-Temple, Baroness, Memorials (1890), pp. 17, 61.Google Scholar

32 Cowper, Katrine Cecilia, Earl Cowper, K.G.: a memoir by his wife (1913), p. 300.Google Scholar

33 He is referred to as Morpeth throughout the text of this article.

34 Mandler, Peter, ‘Cain and Abel: two aristocrats and the early Victorian factory acts’, Historical Journal, 27 (1984), 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Brent, , Liberal anglican politics, pp. 135–8.Google Scholar

36 Morpeth, Journal, 7 Apr. 1845, 8 Mar. 1850, Extracts, pp. 21, 103.

37 Morpeth, Journal, 17 Jan. 1861, Ibid. p. 320.

38 Morpeth, Journal, 22 Aug. 1852, Ibid. p. 187.

39 Morpeth to his mother, 24 Oct. 1831, quoted in Olien, Diana Davids, Morpeth: a Victorian public career (Washington, D.C., 1983), p. 100.Google Scholar

40 Morpeth, Journal, 30 Mar. 1846, 30 Sept. 1849, 21 Mar. 1852, Extracts, pp. 30, 87, 173.

41 Morpeth, Journal, 4 Apr. 1852, 23 Nov. 1858, Ibid. pp. 174–5, 280.

42 However, Mandler, , Aristocratic government, pp. 237–8Google Scholar, suggests that Russell's offer of the Woods and Forests may have been less of a slight than it seemed, since ‘the Woods and Forests was the public works department of the early Victorian period, a kind of Home Office annexe for State interventions…. It was now charged with full responsibility for public health and urban improvement questions, which Russell had placed at the top of his agenda’.

43 ‘Address to the Manchester Athenaeum, October 1846’, Carlisle, , Lectures and addresses in aid of popular education (1852), pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

44 For a perceptive and sympathetic account of Morpeth's periods of service in Ireland, see Olien, , Morpeth, pp. 126–249, 403–506.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. P. 376.

46 Mandler, , Aristocratic government, p. 241 n. 18Google Scholar; Olien, , Morpeth, p. 99.Google Scholar

47 Olien, , Morpeth, p. 327Google Scholar. One historian goes further, referring to the ‘wreckage’ of the Public Health Bill in the course of the Commons debates. Finer, S. E., The life and times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (1952), p. 323Google Scholar. Mandler, However, Aristocratic government, p. 260Google Scholar, suggests that ‘the bill passed quite smoothly through the Commons’.

48 Brundage, Anthony, England's ‘Prussian minister’: Edwin Chadwick and the politics of government growth, 1832–1854 (University Park, Pennsylvania, 1988), pp. 123, 136–7.Google Scholar

49 Morpeth, Journal, 29 Apr. 1846, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/11/24, Castle Howard, York – by kind permission of the Howard family.

50 Morpeth in house of commons, 3 Mar. 1847, Hansard's parliamentary debates, 3rd series, XC, 784.

51 ‘Address by the earl of Carlisle on the punishment and reformation of criminals’, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science: 1858, edited by Hastings, George W. (1859), pp. 69–83Google Scholar. I am grateful to Lawrence Goldman for this reference and for much advice on this subject.

52 For an appraisal of the S.S.A. see Goldman, Lawrence, ‘The Social Science Association, 1857–1886: a context for mid-Victorian liberalism’, English Historical Review, 101 (1986), 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Parry, , Democracy and religion, pp. 112–16.Google Scholar

54 Morpeth, Journal, 11 Mar. 1849, Extracts, p. 75.

55 Reminiscences by Goldwin Smith, edited by Haultain, A. (New York, 1910), pp. 301–2Google Scholar; Macaulay to MrsTrevelyan, C., 5 Nov. 1846, The letters of Thomas Babington Macaulay, edited by Thomas, Pinney (6 vols., Cambridge, 1974–1981), IV, 320Google Scholar. Compare Lady Theresa Lewis to Clarendon, 8 Dec. 1864: ‘Poor Lord Carlisle!…. The truth was, poor man, that he had a mind capable of just so much cultivation as to yield a very pretty flower-garden; but the soil was not deep enough for forest trees’. Maxwell, H., The life and letters of George William Frederick, fourth earl of Clarendon (2 vols., 1913), II, 296.Google Scholar

56 Carlisle, , Lectures, pp. 79–83, 127–8Google Scholar. Carlisle also believed that contemporary London represented ‘the highest period of civilization’. Morpeth, Journal, 23 Mar. 1858, Extracts, p. 265.

57 Carlisle, , Lectures, pp. 69, 77, 128.Google Scholar

58 Morpeth was concerned that, while British exhibits excelled in terms of usefulness, they were inferior to foreign exhibits in terms of beauty and decoration. Morpeth. Journal, 15 Oct. 1851, Extracts, p. 163; Carlisle, , Lectures, pp. 101–2, 120.Google Scholar

59 The published Extracts from journals kept by George Howard, earl of Carlisle, make up only a tiny portion of the whole, and the editing is unreliable in places.

60 Mandler, ‘Cain and Abel’, loc. cit., 107, ‘can find no trace in Morpeth's early career of the kind of religious or even strictly moral motivationse which inspired Ashley's entry into the factory question’.

61 Olien, , Morpeth, p. 257Google Scholar, speculates briefly that, in his intimate talks with Prescott, Morpeth may have allowed himself to entertain hitherto suppressed doubts of a rationalist nature concerning orthodox doctrines.

62 Ibid. pp. 271–5.

63 Cowper to Morpeth, 20 Apr. 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/1/45/21.

64 However, it is noteworthy that some participants in mesmeric experiments were former Irvingites, who may have identified mesmeric trances with ‘speaking in tongues’. Alison, Winter, ‘“The island of mesmeria”: the politics of mesmerism in early Victorian Britain’ (Cambridge University Ph.D, 1993), pp. 50, 103Google Scholar and n. 135. I am grateful to Alison Winter for this and much other help and information.

65 In 1839 Morpeth had recommended Melvill's sermons to Cowper, who replied that Melvill was ‘the finest preacher’ he had ever heard. Cowper to Morpeth, 6 May 1839, Castle Howard Archives, J19/1/23/29.

66 Henry, Melvill, Sermons preached before the university ofCambridge, during the month of February, 1836 (Cambridge, 1836), pp. 21–42Google Scholar. Morpeth, Journal, 8 and 24 Feb. 1844, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/2/37–9.

67 Melvill, , Four sermons preached before the university of Cambridge, during the month of February, 1837 (Cambridge, 1837), pp. 64–5.Google Scholar

68 Morpeth, Journal, 27 Sept. 1852, Extracts, p. 189.

69 Carlisle, , Diary in Turkish and Greek waters (1854), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

70 Carlisle, , The second vision of Daniel: a paraphrase in verse (1858), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

71 Oliver, W. H., Prophets and millennialists: the uses of biblical prophecy in England from the 1790s to the 1840s (Auckland, 1978), p. 220.Google Scholar

72 Oliver describes the American Mormons in similar terms. Ibid. pp. 218–38.

73 Cowper to Morpeth, 20 Apr. 1848, loc. cit.

74 Oliver, , Prophets and millennialists, pp. 99, 106–7, 132–4Google Scholar; Flegg, C. G., ‘Gathered under apostles’: a study of the Catholic Apostolic Church (Oxford, 1992), pp. 302, 327–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75 Frere, , Eight letters on the prophecies, relating to the last times; viz: the seventh vial; the civil and ecclesiastical prophetic periods; and the type of Jericho (1831), pp. 51–7.Google Scholar

76 Ibid. pp. 79–80.

77 Cowper to Morpeth, 20 Apr. 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/1/45/21 (italics added).

78 Frere, J. H., Eight letters on the prophecies, pp. 1–2, 16–17, 25–32, 77–8.Google Scholar

79 Frere, J. H., The great continental revolution marking the expiration of the times of the gentiles, A.D. 1847–8 (1848), pp. 35–40.Google Scholar

80 Frere, J. H., Preface to the second edition of the great continental revolution, containing remarks on the progress of prophetic events during the year 1848–9 (1849), pp. vii, ix, xix–xx.Google Scholar

81 Melvill, , ‘The greatness and condescension of God’, Sermons preached during February 1836, P. 19.Google Scholar

82 Orchard, S. C., ‘English evangelical eschatology 1790–1850’ (Cambridge University Ph.D., 1969), p. 184Google Scholar. Note the laconic tone of Morpeth's journal entry recording one of the 1848 revolutions: ‘The Times has another bloody insurrection at Vienna – When oh Lord! when?’ Morpeth, Journal, 13 Oct. 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/19/6.

83 Candlish, R. S., Four letters to the Rev. E. B. Elliott, on some passages in his Horae apocalypticae (1846), pp. 85–7Google Scholar. However, Morpeth reported Candlish as seeming lukewarm about prophecy, which deserved ‘to occupy, not to engross our attention’. ‘The real personal descent of Christ to each of us’ was far more important than ‘how Babylon was doomed, or Israel restored’. Morpeth, Journal, 7 May 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/17/38, Extracts, p. 61.

84 Maurice, F. D., Lectures on the apocalypse; or, book of revelation of St. John the Divine (Cambridge and London, 1861), pp. 379–81Google Scholar. Wheeler, Michael, Death and the future life in Victorian literature and theology (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 126–7.Google Scholar

85 For Elliott's view that Maurice's vision of the apocalypse was too immediate, see Orchard, , ‘English evangelical eschatology’, p. 201.Google Scholar

86 Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 267–97.Google Scholar

87 ‘Sat by Ly Gainsborough, whom I like extremely. We got upon Prophecy, on which she is much on the alert, and talks with a very broad smile of hearing the great Trumpet at any moment. But this in a way so simple as to divest it of anything unpleasing’. Morpeth, Journal, 17 May 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/17/42.

88 Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 12–15 and passim.Google Scholar

89 Henry, Melvill, ‘The greatness and condescension of God’, loc. cit., pp. 10, 16, and passim.Google Scholar

90 Elliott, E. B., The Christian's view of the cause and remedy of the present national distress. A sermon (1830), p. 6.Google Scholar

91 Knox to Lady?, Dec. 1815, Remains of Alexander Knox, edited by Hornby, J. J. (1834–1837), II, 256, 262.Google Scholar

92 Morpeth, , The second vision of Daniel, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

93 Morpeth, Journal, 4 Dec. 1844, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/5/63–4, Extracts, p. 15.

94 Morpeth, Journal, 23 Mar. 1848, Ibid. J19/8/17/21.

95 Reardon, Bernard M. G., From Coleridge to Gore: a century of religious thought in Britain (1971), PP. 243–5.Google Scholar

96 Milman, H. H., Hebrew prophecy. A sermon (Oxford and London, 1865), pp. 14, 34.Google Scholar

97 Forbes, , Liberal anglican idea, pp. 97, 99.Google Scholar

98 Corsi, , Science and religion, pp. 195, 216–18.Google Scholar

99 Arnold to F. C. Blackstone, 25 Oct. 1831, Stanley, A. P., The life and correspondence of Thomas Arnold (5th edition, 2 vols., 1845), I, 311.Google Scholar

100 Arnold to Sir Thomas Pasley, 25 Jan. 1840, Ibid. II, 194–5.

101 Arnold to John Tucker, 5 Apr. 1825, Ibid. I, 77.

102 Arnold to Blackstone, 1 Nov. 1833, Ibid. II, 18. The best exposition of Arnold's providentialism is in Forbes, , Liberal anglican idea, pp. 72–5, 97–8, 110, 172.Google Scholar

103 A similar point is made in Milman, , Hebrew prophecy, pp. 14, 34–7.Google Scholar

104 Morpeth, Journal, 7 Sept. and 4 Dec. 1844, Extracts, pp. 12, 16.

105 Morpeth, Journal, 20 Sept. 1863, Ibid. p. 399.

106 Morpeth to Lady Holland, 20 Mar. 1844, Holland House papers, British Library, Add. MS 51583 fos. 124–5 (italics added).

107 Carlisle to Chadwick, 18 Oct. 1848, University College London, Chadwick MSS, quoted in Brundage, , England's ‘Prussian minister, p. 136.Google Scholar

108 Morpeth, Journal, 21 May 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/17/44.

109 Morpeth, Journal, 12 Dec. 1862, Extracts, p. 376. Faith in God's benevolence suffered a rare lapse during the Irish, Famine: ‘The accounts from Ireland grow too shocking, and combined with some of my sanitary reading, shock the reason and stagger the faith’Google Scholar. Ibid. 7 Jan. 1847, p. 41.

110 Morpeth, Journal, 8 Mar. 1844, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/2/43.

111 Henry, Melvill, Sermons preached at Cambridge, during the month of November, 1839 (1840), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

112 Ibid. pp. 7–16. For resonances of the word ‘incorporated’, see Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 255–97.Google Scholar

113 Melvill, , Four sermons preached during February 1837, pp. 65–6.Google Scholar

114 W. G. Blaikie's entry on Candlish in Dictionary of national biography.

115 Morpeth, Journal, 14 Mar. 1855, 8 Mar. 1861 and Mar 1864, Extracts, pp. 218, 322, 417; MacDonnell, J. C., The doctrine of the atonement deduced from scripture, and vindicated from misrepresentations and objections (1858)Google Scholar; Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 292–3.Google Scholar

116 Morpeth, Journal, 5 and 12 Mar. 1848, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/17/11, 17, Extracts, p. 57. Harness, W., The image of God in man: four sermons preached before the university of Cambridge in February 1841 (1841), p. 5 and passimGoogle Scholar.

117 Knox, Alexander, ‘On the mediatory character of Christ, as subsisting in our Lord's manhood and flesh’, Remains of Knox, II, 278 (italics added)Google Scholar.

118 Morpeth, Journal, 13–23 Oct. 1843, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/1/13–23; 27 Nov. 1843, Extracts, p. 1.

119 Channing, W. E., ‘The great purpose of Christianity’, Works of W. E. Channing (3rd edition, 6 vols., Glasgow, 1840–1844), III, 211–12.Google Scholar

120 Channing, , ‘The imitableness of Christ's character’, Works, IV, 144.Google Scholar

121 Morpeth, Journal, 24 March 1850, Castle Howard Archives, J19/1/23/64, Extracts, p. 107; Candlish, R. S., ‘God's ways not man's ways’, The gospel of forgiveness: a series of discourses (Edinburgh, 1878), pp. 264–83.Google Scholar

122 Candlish, R. S., The fatherhood of God (Edinburgh, 1865), pp. vi–xx, 208–50Google Scholar, and passim; Rainy, Robert, ‘Dr Candlish as a theologian’, Memorials of Robert Smith Candlish, D.D., by William Wilson (Edinburgh, 1880), pp. 610–21.Google Scholar

123 Candlish, R. S., Discourses bearing upon the sonship and brotherhood of believers and other kindred subjects (Edinburgh, 1872), pp. 1–53, 94–113, 192–9Google Scholar; Morpeth, Journal, 3 Apr. 1853, Extracts, p. 202. Another favourite preacher was Thomas Guthrie, especially when he dealt with texts such as ‘God abiding with us’. Morpeth, Journal, 11 Feb., 1855, Ibid. p. 216.

124 Candlish, , Discourses, p. 53.Google Scholar

125 Morpeth, Journal, 23 Sept. 1844, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/5/11.

126 Cowper to Morpeth, 14 Sept. 1843, Castle Howard Archives, J19/1/36/31.

127 Morpeth to Lady Holland, 20 Mar. 1844, loc. cit. Such sentiments may be thought to justify some contemporary perceptions that Morpeth was ‘good-tempered but perhaps too facile’. Quillinan, Edward to Robinson, H. C., 23 Mar. 1845, The correspondence of Henry Crabb Robinson with the Wordsworth circle, edited by Morley, E. J. (2 vols., Oxford, 1927), II, 593–4.Google Scholar

128 Arnold, Thomas, The Christian duty of granting the claims of the roman catholics (Oxford, 1829), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar ‘Or will it be said’, continued Arnold, ‘that all worldly objects are too insignificant to engage the attention of an heir of immortality? Yet it is only by the pursuit of some worldly object that we can perform our worldly duty, and so train ourselves up for immortality; it is by improving the various faculties that are given to us that we can fit ourselves for our everlasting habitation’. Ibid.

129 Arnold, Thomas, Fragment on the church (1844), pp. 11–12Google Scholar; Morpeth, Journal, 4 Dec. 1844, Castle Howard Archives, J19/8/5/64.

130 Morpeth, Journal, 14 July 1844, Extracts, p. II, quoted in Brent, , Liberal anglican politics, pp. 138–9.Google Scholar

131 Morpeth, Journal, 29 Oct. 1857, Extracts, p. 260. For the influence on whig–liberals of Tom Brown's schooldays and of Arnold generally, see Parry, , Democracy and religion, pp. 68–9.Google Scholar

132 Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 332–7.Google Scholar

133 Winter, , ‘“Island ofmesmeria”’, pp. 62–7Google Scholar. For interest shown in mesmerism by Arnold and Whately, see Ibid. pp. 56–8.

134 See above, n. 46.

135 Thirlwall to?, 17 Feb. 1865, Letters to a friend by Connop Thirlwall, edited by Stanley, A. P. (1881), p. 18Google Scholar. On conservation of energy see Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 309–14.Google Scholar

136 Hilton, , Age of atonement, pp. 298–304, 372Google Scholar; Hugh, McLeod, ‘Varieties of Victorian belief’, Journal of Modern History, 64 (1992), 334–5Google Scholar; Bebbington, D. W., ‘Religion and society in the nineteenth century’, Historical Journal, 32 (1989), 1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

137 Here a distinction must be observed, however. Most incarnational theologians in the first half of the nineteenth century were immanentists or pantheists who rejected the currently fashionable view of God as a transcendent Being apart from and judging the world. Those Anglicans who shifted the fulcrum of their theology from the atonement to the incarnation in mid century, from the sacrifice of Jesus to his life and teachings, continued to think of God as a transcendent Being and of Christ as man's redeemer.

138 Though Dr Bebbington urges, most plausibly, that incarnationalist thought resurfaced in public life via Tawney, Temple, and Beveridge, and that it provided an ideological underpinning for the welfare state (private communication). See Nicholls, David, Deity and domination: images of god and the state in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (1989), pp. 31–87Google Scholar; Harris, Jose, ‘Political ideas and the debate on state welfare, 1940–45’, War and social change in British society in the second world war, edited by Smith, Harold L. (Manchester, 1986), pp. 233–63.Google Scholar