No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lunar Magnetism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2016
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
It was not generally anticipated by lunar scientists that the Moon rocks would prove to possess a natural remanent magnetization because the absence of a present field had already been demonstrated and it was almost universally believed that the Moon did not possess an iron core in which such a field could be generated. Consequently the initial investigation of Apollo 11 rocks was directed towards the use of rock magnetic studies as an adjunct to petrological examination. One of the most notable findings of the Apollo programme was the demonstration of the existence of a natural remanent magnetization (NRM) in Apollo 11 lavas and breccias. Experiments on the stability of the NRM enabled it to be concluded that the rocks were already magnetized when they were on the Moon. This conclusion was soon corroborated by the discovery of the existence of a steady magnetic field at the Apollo 12 site of the magnitude expected from the intensity of the NRM of about 36 γ (in addition to the field fluctuating solar wind. It was reasoned from this early work that the natural remanent magnetization had been acquired at the time of origin of the rocks or at least in their early history and a case was made out that this was a thermoremanent magnetization acquired as the lava flows cooled from magma flowing into the mare basin and as the high grade breccias cooled after the impacts. The origin of the natural remanent magnetization of the low grade breccias is more problematic and the role of other kinds of remanent magnetization processes has been investigated, particularly the effect of shock.
- Type
- Joint Dicussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Reidel 1977
References
Runcorn, S.K., Collinson, D.W., O’Reilly, W., Battey, M.H., Stephenson, A., Jones, J.M., Manson, A.J. and Readman, P.W., Magnetic properties of Apollo 11 lunar samples, In
Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Science Conference, vol. 3, 2369–2387, 1970.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Collinson, D.W., O’Reilly, W., Stephenson, A., Battey, M.H., Manson, A.J. & Readman, P.W., Magnetic properties of Apollo 12 lunar samples, Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.A.
325, 157–174, 1971.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Collinson, D.W., Stephenson, A. and Manson, A.J., Magnetic properties of Apollo 14 rocks and fines, Proc. 3rd Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Suppl. 3, 3, 2343–2361, 1972.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Collinson, D.W. and Stephenson, A., Magnetic properties of Apollo 15 and 16 rocks, Proc. 4th Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochim. et Cosmochim.Acta, Suppl. 4, 3, 2963–2976, 1973.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., On the origin of mascons and tnoonquakes, Proc. 5th Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Suppl. 5, 3, 3115–3126, 1974.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Stephenson, A., Collinson, D.W., Lunar magnetic field palaeointensity determinations on Apollo 11, 16 and 17 rocks. Proc. 5th Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochim. et Cosmochim.Acta, Suppl. 5, 3, 2859–2871, 1974.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Stephenson, A. and Collinson, D.W.. On changes in the intensity of the ancient lunar magnetic field. Proc. 6th Lunar Sci. Conf., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Suppl. 6, 3049–3062, 1975.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Solid state convection and the mechanics of the Moon, Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 6th., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Suppl. 6, 2943–2953, 1975.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Inferences concerning the early thermal history of the Moon. Proc. 7th Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochim. et Cosmochim.Acta, Suppl. 7, 3221–3228, 1976.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S.K., Stephenson, A. and Collinson, D.W., On the intensity of the ancient lunar magnetic field, Proc. 7th Lunar Sci.Conf., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Suppl. 7, 3373–3382, 1976.Google Scholar
You have
Access