Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T21:02:28.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entry Flashes of Cometary Fragments in Jovian Upper Atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

S. Takeuchi
Affiliation:
National Space Development Agency of Japan Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
H. Hasegawa
Affiliation:
ASTEC, Inc. Minami-cho, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162, Japan
J. Watanabe
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181, Japan

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Short lasting flashes, called as First Precursor (PC1), were observed by some ground-based near-infrared observations for the impacts of large-sized fragments of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) in July 1994. The impact detections by the spacecraft Galileo [2, 7] about 10 seconds after the PC1 detections by ground based telescopes, combined with the far-side impacts of SL9 fragments as viewed from Earth, suggest that the source of the PC1 should be located in the Jovian upper atmosphere above the limb, at which the atmospheric pressure is extremely low. Thus, an important problem on the PC1 is how does the falling cometary fragment, which is a huge meteorite, emit near-infrared in the extremely thin atmosphere. The ablation model, which is usually used for an impact bolide, can only estimate flux from the bolide in a dense atmosphere at visible wavelength. In this paper, we assume that the PC1s are thermal radiation from the fragments and attempt quantitative estimations of the PCI fluxes using a simple entry flash model.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998

References

1. Atreya, S.K., et al. (1981), Jupiter: Structure and composition of the upper atmosphere, Ap J, 247, L43-L47.Google Scholar
2. Chapman, C.R., et al. (1995), Preliminary results of Galileo direct imaging of SL-9 impacts, GRL, 22, pp. 15611564.Google Scholar
3. Chodas, P.W., and Yeomans, D.K. (1996), The orbital motion and impact circumstances of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, pp. 130, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
4. Graham, J.R., et al. (1995), The fragment R collision: W.M. Keck telescope observations of SL9, Science, 267, pp. 13201323.Google Scholar
5. Hammel, H., et al. (1995), HST imaging of atmospheric phenomena created by the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, Science, 267, pp. 12881296.Google Scholar
6. Herbst, T.M., et al. (1995), Near infrared imaging and spectroscopy of the SL9 impacts from Calar Alto, GRL, 22, pp. 24132416.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D.P., et al. (1995), Calar Alto observations of the Shoemaker-Levy 9: Characteristics of the H and L impacts, GRL, 22, pp. 24172420.Google Scholar
7. Martin, T.Z., et al. (1995), Observation of Shoemaker-Levy impacts by the Galileo Photopolarimeter Radiometer, Science, 268, pp. 187518798.Google Scholar
8. McGregor, P.J., et al. (1996), CASPIR observations of the collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter, Icarus, 121, pp. 361388.Google Scholar
9. Meadows, V., and Crisp, D. (1995), Impact plume composition from near-infrared spectroscopy, Proceedings of European SL9/Jupiter Workshop, pp. 239244.Google Scholar
10. Seiff, A., et al. (1996), Structure of the atmosphere of Jupiter: Galileo probe measurements, Science, 272, pp. 844845.Google Scholar
Seiff, A., et al. (1997), Thermal structure of Jupiter’s upper atmosphere derived from the Galileo probe, Science, 276, pp. 102104.Google Scholar
11. Sekanina, Z. (1996), Collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter: impact study of two fragments from the timing of precursor events, A & Ap, 314, pp. 315327.Google Scholar
12. Takeuchi, S., et al. (1995), Near-IR imaging observations of the cometary impact into Jupiter, GRL, 22, pp. 15811584.Google Scholar
13. Weaver, H.A., et al. (1995), The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observing campaign on comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, Science, 267, pp. 12821288.Google Scholar