Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:14:49.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of Post‐Cold War American Isolationism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Jhon Dumbrell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 24 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Seitz, R., Over Here, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998, p. 330.Google Scholar

2 Lake, A., ‘The Need for Engagement’, State Department Dispatch, 5 12 1994 , p. 804.Google Scholar

3 Quoted in Rosner, J. D., The New Tug‐of‐War: Congress, the Executive Branch and National Security, Washington DC, Carnegie Endowment, 1995, p. 2.Google Scholar

4 Muravchik, J., The Imperative of American Leadership: A Challenge to Neo‐Isolationism, Washington DC, American Enterprise Institute Press, 1996, pp. 11, 18 Google Scholar.

5 Weinberger, C. and Schweizer, P., The Next War, Washington DC, Regnery, 1996.Google Scholar

6 Weyrich, P. M., ‘A Populist Policy’, The National Interest, 21 (1990), pp. 48–61, 54–55.Google Scholar

7 See Steel, R., Walter Lippmann and the American Century, London, The Bodley Head, 1980, p. 586.Google Scholar

8 See Holsti, O. R., ‘The Study of International Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows ’, American Political Science Review, 68:1 (1974), pp. 217–2.Google Scholar

9 See Franke‐Ruta, G., ‘The IMF gets a Left and a Right’, National Journal, 17 April 1998Google Scholar.

10 See, e.g., Barnet, R. J. et al., ‘American Priorities in the New Era’, World Policy Journal, 6:3 (1989), pp. 203–37.Google Scholar

11 See Kirkpatrick, J. J., ‘A Normal Country in a Normal Time ’, The National Interest, 21:1 (1990), pp. 40–44.Google Scholar

12 See Ruggie, J. G., Winning the Peace: America and World Order in the New Era, New York, Columbia University Press, 1996, p.219;Google Scholar Schneider, W., ‘The New Isolationism’, in Lieber, R. J. (ed.), Eagle Adrift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century, New York, Longman, 1997, pp. 26–38.Google Scholar

13 Ruggie, op. cit., pp. 158–61.

14 See Nordlinger, E. A., Isolationism Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 22–3Google Scholar. The best known commentator associated with the Cato Institute is Ted Galen Carpenter (see Carpenter, T. G., The Captive Press: Foreign Policy Crises and the First Amendment, Washington DC, Cato Institute, 1995;Google Scholar Perlmutter, A. and Carpenter, T. G., ‘NATO’s Expensive Trip East’, Foreign Affairs, 77:1 (1998), pp. 2–5;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Carpenter, T. G. and Conry, B. (eds), NATO Enlargement: Illusion and Reality, Washington DC, Cato Institute, 1998)Google Scholar.

15 Time, 7 April 1995, p. 22.

16 Weinberger, C., Fighting for Peace: Seven Critical Years at the Pentagon, London, Michael Joseph, 1990, p. 22.Google Scholar

17 See Powell, C., A Soldier’s Way: An Autobiography, London, Hutchinson, 1995 Google Scholar (analysis of the defeat in Vietnam).

18 See Tucker, R. W. and Hendrickson, D. C., The Imperial Temptation, New York, Council on Foreign Relations, 1992, p. 152.Google Scholar

19 Lipset, S. M., American Exceptionalism: A Double‐Edged Sword, New York, W. W. Norton, 1996, pp. 288–9.Google Scholar

20 Hirst, P. and Thompson, G., Globalisation in Question, Oxford, Polity, 1996;Google Scholar Marshall, D. D., ‘Understanding Late‐Twentieth‐Century Capitalism: Reassessing the Globalization Thesis’, Government and Opposition, 31:2 (Spring 1996), pp. 193–215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Payne, R. J., The Clash with Distant Cultures, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1995, p. 89.Google Scholar See also, Barber, B., Jihad vs. Mc World, New York, Ballantine Books, 1996;Google Scholar Pells, R., Not Like Us, New York, Basic Books, 1997.Google Scholar

22 For further discussion, see Dumbrell, J., The Making of US Foreign Policy, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1997, pp. 34–36.Google Scholar

23 See, e.g., Rai, K. B., Walsh, D. F. and Best, P. J. (eds), America in the 21st Century, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1997;Google Scholar Haass, R. N., The Reluctant Sheriff The United States after the Cold War, Washington DC, Brookings Institution, 1998.Google Scholar

24 National Journal, 14 March 1998, p. 585.

25 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 27 May 1995, p. 1514.

26 Quoted in Walker, M., ‘A New American Isolationism?’, International Journal, 52:3 (1997), pp. 391–410, p. 405.Google Scholar

27 For a colourful expression of this view, see President Lyndon Johnson’s remarks of February 1964 in Beschloss, M. R. (ed.), Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963–64, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1997, p. 243.Google Scholar

28 See Kagan, R., ‘A Retreat from Power’, Commentary, 07 1995, pp. 19–26;Google Scholar Hillen, J., ‘Picking up UN Peacekeeping’s Pieces’, Foreign Affairs, 77:4 (1998), pp. 96–101, p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 See Brown, S., The Faces of Power, New York, Columbia University Press, 1994, p. 609.Google Scholar

30 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 21 Oct. 1995, p. 3214; also, Bacevich, A. C., ‘The Impact of the New Populism’, Orbis, 40:1 (1996), pp. 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Killian, L., The Freshmen, Boulder, Colo., Westview Press, 1998, p. 156.Google Scholar

31 ‘Elections 96: Foreign Policy Views of Republican Candidates’, London, US Embassy (US Information Service), 1996.

32 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 3 Feb. 1996, p. 309.

33 See Choate, P., Agents of Influence, New York, Knopf, 1990.Google Scholar

34 Schneider, ‘The New Isolationism’, p. 29.

35 For various debates within American conservatism on immigration and American identity, see Buchanan, P., Right from the Beginning, Washington DC, Regnery Gateway, 1990, p. 64;Google Scholar O’Sullivan, J., ‘America’s Identity Crisis’, National Review, 21 11 1994 , pp. 73–81;Google Scholar Brimelow, P., Alien Nation, New York, Harper Perennial, 1996.Google Scholar

36 See Clough, M., ‘Say Good‐bye to the “Wise Men”’, Foreign Affairs, 73:1 (1994), pp. 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar On post‐cold war decentralization, see Dumbrell, , The Making of US Foreign Policy, pp. 153–63, 188–90.Google Scholar

37 Schneider, op. cit., p. 35.

38 See Powlick, P. J. and Katz, A. Z., ‘Defining the American Public Opinion/Foreign Policy Nexus’, Mershon International Studies Review, 42:1 (1998), pp. 29–61.Google Scholar

39 See Richman, A., ‘What the Polls Say’, US Foreign Policy Agenda (United States Information Agency electronic journals), Oct. 1996, p. 20;Google Scholar Rosner, J. D., ‘The Know‐Nothings Know Something’, Foreign Policy, 101 (1995–96). pp. 116–29;Google Scholar America’s Place in the World II, Washington DC, Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, Oct. 1997; Bacevich, ‘The Impact of the New Populism’.

40 See Jentleson, B. W., ‘The Pretty Prudent Public: Post‐Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of the Military Force’, International Studies Quarterly, 36:1 (1992). pp. 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Seel Rielly, E., (ed.), American Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy 1995, Chicago, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 1995, pp. 34–7.Google Scholar The largest gap occurred regarding public support for economic protectionism. See also Kull, S., Destler, I. M., and Ramsay, C., The Foreign Policy Gap, College Park, Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, 1997.Google Scholar

42 See Kull, S., ‘What the Public Knows that Washington Doesn’t’, Foreign Policy, 101 (1995–96), pp. 102–15, p. 107;Google Scholar Richman, op. cit., p. 17; Crossette, B., ‘Poll Finds American Support for Peacekeeping’, New York Times, 30 04 1995 ; Rodman, P. W., The Paradox of Presidential Campaigns’, Orbis, 40:2 (1996), pp. 53–61.Google Scholar

43 See Rielly, op. cit., p. 34.

44 See Nincic, M., ‘Domestic Costs, the US Public, and the Isolationist Calculus’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4 (1997), pp. 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Morris, M., ‘Searching for a New Domestic Consensus’, in Hutchings, R. L. (ed.), At the End of America’s Century, Washington DC, The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998, pp. 199–220.Google Scholar

45 Buchanan, P. J., The Great Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice are being Sacrificed to the Gods of the Global Economy, Boston, Little Brown, 1998 Google Scholar. See also Greider, W., One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1997;Google Scholar Craige, B. J., American Patriotism in a Global Society, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

46 Eckes, A. E., ‘A New Protectionism?’, in Hutchings (ed.), At the End of America’s Century, pp. 168–179, 171.Google Scholar

47 See Held, D., ‘Globalisation: The Third Tendency’, Marxism Today (special issue, November 1998), pp. 24–29;Google Scholar also Krugman, P., ‘A Desperate Remedy’, Fortune, 7 09. 1998, pp. 30–34.Google Scholar

48 See Burtless, G., Lawrence, R. Z., Litan, R. E. and Shapiro, R. J., Globophobia: Confronting Fears about Open Trade, Washington DC, Brookings Institution, 1998 Google Scholar.

49 See Naim, M., ‘Clinton’s Foreign Policy: A Victim of Globalisation?’, Foreign Policy. 109 (1997–1998), pp. 35–45;Google Scholar Woodward, B., The Agenda. New York, Pocket Books, 1995, p. 84.Google ScholarPubMed

50 See Gamble, A. and Payne, A. (eds), Regionalism and World Order, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 See Kaplan, L. F., ‘Dollar Diplomacy Returns’, Commentary, Feb. 1998, pp. 52–4.Google Scholar

52 Maynes, C. W., ‘The Perils of (and for) an Imperial America’, Foreign Policy, 111 (1998), pp. 36–48.Google Scholar See also Nordlinger, Isolationism Reconfigured; Sandel, M. J., Democracy’s Discontents: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1996;Google Scholar Kurth, J., ‘The Adolescent Empire’, The National Interest, 48 (1997), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar

53 See Klare, M. T., ‘US Military Policy in the Post‐Cold War Era’, in Miliband, R. and Panitch, L. (eds), The Socialist Register 1992, London, Merlin, 1992, pp. 131–42;Google Scholar Hartung, W. D., ‘Nixon’s Children’, World Policy Journal, 12:1 (1995), pp. 25–35 Google Scholar(on arms sales); Ashcar, G., ‘The Strategic Triad: The United States, Russia and China’, New Left Review, 228 (1998), pp. 91–126.Google Scholar

54 See Hames, T., ‘Foreign Policy and the American Elections of 1992’, International Relations, 11:3 (1993), pp. 315–30;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Petras, J. and Morley, M., Empire or Republic? American Global Power and Domestic Decay, New York, Routledge, 1995;Google Scholar Huntington, S. P., ‘Why International Primacy Matters’, International Security, 17:1 (1993), pp. 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 McNamara, R., Out of the Cold, New York, Pantheon, 1989.Google Scholar

56 See, e.g., Ravenal, E., ‘The Case for Adjustment’, Foreign Policy, 81 (1990–1991), pp. 3–19;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bandow, D., ‘Keeping the Troops and the Money at Home’, Current History, 93:1 (1994), pp.8–13.Google Scholar Also, Tonelson, A., ‘Superpower Without a Sword’, Foreign Affairs, 72:3 (1993), pp. 172–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 See Posen, B. R. and Ross, A. L., ‘Competing US Grand Strategies’, in Lieber, (ed.), Eagle Adrift, pp. 100–34, at p. 103.Google Scholar

58 Layne, C., ‘Less is More’, The National Interest, 42 (1996), pp. 17–24.Google Scholar See also Steel, R., The Temptations of a Superpower, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

59 See Cheney, S. A., ‘The General’s Folly’, Foreign Affairs, 77:1 (1998), pp. 155–57;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Odom, W. E., America’s Military Revolution: Strategy and Structure after the Cold War, Washington DC, American University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

60 See Trubowitz, P., Defining the National Interest, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 244–5.Google Scholar

61 See Dumbrell, J., American Foreign Policy: Carter to Clinton, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, P. 169 (Bush, Jan. 1993 speech at West Point military academy), and p. 185 (Clinton, Sept. 1993 UN speech); Bert, W., The Relunctant Superpower: United States’ Policy in Bosnia, 1991–95, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1997, p. 17 Google Scholar (Christopher). See also Powell, C., ‘US Forces: Challenges Abroad’, Foreign Affairs, 72:5 (1992–1991), pp. 32–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maynes, C. W., ‘Relearning Intervention’, Foreign Policy, 98: (1995), pp. 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George Bush: 1992: Book I, Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, 1993, p. 1069.

63 Mandelbaum, M., ‘Foreign Policy as Social Work’, Foreign Affairs, 75:1 (1996), pp. 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 Quoted in Bert, The Reluctant Superpower, p. 18.

65 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 3 Feb. 1996, p. 306.

66 Wall Street Journal, 6 Feb. 1995.

67 Quoted in Cheney, The General’s Folly’, p. 156. See also Papacosma, S. V. and Heiss, M. A. (eds), NATO in the Post‐Cold War Era: Does it Have a Future ?, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 See Rubinstein, A. Z., ‘NATO Enlargement vs American Interests’, Orbis, 42:1 (1998), pp. 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69 See Citrin, J, Haas, E. B., Muste, C. and Reingold, B., ‘Is American Nationalism Changing? Implications for Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 38:1 (1994), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 ‘Super 301’ was originally legislated in 1988. It was extended by executive order in 1994. Bypassing GATT, it requires the president to retaliate against identified ‘unfair trade practices’.

71 Maynes, op. cit., calculates that between 1993 and 1996, the US imposed or threatened unilateral sanctions 60 times. See also R. N. Haass (ed.), Economic Sanctions and American Diplomacy, Washington DC, Brookings Institution, 1998.

72 Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 11 Jan. 1997, pp. 133–4.

73 As of October 1998, the UN calculated total US debts at $1.6 billion. The US has paid just sufficient dues to retain its vote in the General Assembly.

74 See Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review, Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, 1997.