Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:36:53.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Community, the Rule of Law and Representative Government: The Significance of the Intergovernmental Conferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

John Pinder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCES ON ECONOMIC and monetary union and on political union will have consequences for economic efficiency and for political power within the European Community. Both will be important for the future of Europe. But the focus of this article is somewhat different: the implications for the rule of law and representative government. Only somewhat different, because the rule of law and representative government provide the most secure framework for economic efficiency and political power. But more significant, because they not only provide that framework but also embody fundamental political values.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1991 , pp. 199 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Cass R. Sunstein, ‘Protectionism, the American Supreme Court, and Integrated Markets’, in Bieber, Roland et al. (eds), 1992: One European Market? A Critical Analysis of the Commission’s Internal Market Strategy, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988, pp. 127–8Google Scholar; and Goodhart, A. L., ‘The Constitution of the United States: A Study in Federalism’, in Ransome, Patrick (ed.), Studies in Federal Planning, London, Macmillan, 1943, p. 256 Google Scholar (reprinted by the Lothian Foundation Press, London, 1990).

2 Cecchini, Michel with Catinat, Alexis and Jacquemin, Paolo, The European Challenge 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot, Wildwood House, 1988 Google Scholar, Table 10.2.

3 Robbins, Lionel, National Planning and International Order, London, Macmillan, 1937, in particular pp. 240–2Google Scholar, and The Economic Causes of War, London, Jonathan Cape, 1939.

4 Monnet, Jean, ‘Speech to the National Press Club’, Washington, in his Les Etats-Unis d’Europe ont Commmencé Discours et Allocutions 1952–54, Paris, Robert Laffont, 1955, p. 132 Google Scholar.

5 One Market, One Money, European Economy No. 44, Luxembourg, Commission of the EC, October 1990.

6 Robbins, National Planning and International Order, p. 300, and ‘Economic Aspects of Federation’, in Ransome (ed.), Studies in Federal Planning, pp. 91–2.

7 Conclusions of the European Council, Rome 27–28 October 1990, Brussels, Commission of the EC, October 1990.

8 Financial Times, 12 March 1991.

9 Sir Howe, Geoffrey, ‘Sovereignty and interdependence: Britain’s place in the world’ International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 4, 10 1990, p. 678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Hänsch, Klaus, ‘Europäische Integration und parlamentarische Demokratie’, Europa-Archiv, 7/1986, p. 195 Google Scholar.

11 Camps, Miriam, European Unification in the Sixties: From the Veto to the Crisis, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1966, pp. 59 Google Scholar, 62–3; David Coombes with Wiebecke, Ilka, The Power of the Purse in the European Communities, European Series No. 20, London, Chatham House and PEP, 1972, pp. 24, 26, 39, 45, 51Google Scholar.

12 Jacobs, Francis and Corbett, Richard with Shackleton, Michael, The European Parliament, Harlow, Longman, p. 258 Google Scholar.

13 Agence Europe, No. 1668, 8 December 1990.

14 Nota over de europese politieke unie’, Tweed Kamer 1990–91, 20596, No. 32, 26 October 1990, pp. 14–15, 18.

15 Agence Europe, No. 5433, 16 February 1991.

16 Marshall, Geoffrey, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty’, in Bogdanor, Vernon (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions, Oxford, Blackwell, 1987, p. 407 Google Scholar.

17 Ehlermann, Claus Dietier, ‘Commission Lacks Power in 1992 Process’, European Affair, 1/1990, p. 67 Google Scholar.

18 282 House of Lords Debates, 8 May 1967, col. 1202, cited in Howe, Geoffrey, ‘The European Communities Act 1992’, International Affairs, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01 1973, p. 6 Google Scholar.

19 Howe, loc. cit.

20 Monnet, ‘Inaugural Speech to the High Authority’, in op. cit. (n. 4, supra), p. 57.

21 Sir Butler, Michael, Europe: More than a Continent, London, Heinemann, 1986, p. 22 Google Scholar.

22 De europese politieke unie, op. cit. (n. 14, supra), p. 14.

23 ibid., p. 17; Agence Europe, No. 1668, 8 December 1990.

24 De europese politieke unie, p. 24.

25 ibid., p. 15; Agence Europe, No, 1668, 8 December 1990

26 Eurobarometer: Public Opinion in the European Community, No. 34, December 1990, Brussels, Commission of the EC, Tables 30, 76, 79.

27 Eurobarometer, No. 24, December 1985, Table 33