Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T13:14:42.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—Preliminary Notes on some New and little-known British Jurassic Fishes2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. Smith Woodward
A. Smith Woodward
Affiliation:
British Museum (Natural History).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the works of Agassiz and Egerton, few contributions have been made to the knowledge of British Jurassic “Ganoid” and “Teleostean” Fishes, and a considerable amount of undescribed material has thus accumulated in various collections. Much more progress has been made upon the Continent, where the Lithographic Stones of Bavaria, Würtemberg, and Ain, especially, yield a rich assemblage of forms in a remarkable state of preservation; and it is now an interesting study to compare the British Jurassic fossils with their well-known continental allies. Such an undertaking is facilitated by the recent appearance of Prof. Dr. K. A. von Zittel's admirable critical summary of the extinct Mesozoic fishes; and it is the object of the present notice to offer some preliminary remarks upon a few of the more prominent types observed by the author in English collections.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 10 , October 1889 , pp. 448 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1889

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

2

Read before Section C (Geology), British Association, Newcastle, 09. 1889.

References

page 449 note 1 “Handbuch der Palæontologie,” vol. iii., pts. i. ii. (1887–1888).Google Scholar

page 449 note 2 Wagner, A., “Monographie der fossilen Fische aus den lithographischen Schiefern Bayerns,” Abh. k. bay. Akad. Wiss., cl. ii. vol. ix. (1863), p. 707, pl. iv.Google Scholar

page 450 note 1 Wagner, A., “Beitr. Kennt. lith. Schief. Fische,” Abh. k. bay. Akad. Wiss., cl. ii. vol. vi. (1851), p. 75, pl. ii.Google Scholar

page 450 note 2 Owen, R., “On a Genus and Species of Sauroid Fish (Thlattodus suchoides, Ow ) from the Kimmeridge Clay of Norfolk,” Geol. Mag. Vol. III. (1866), pp. 55–57, Pl. III.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 450 note 3 Wagner, A., loc. cit. (1863), p. 677.Google Scholar

page 451 note 1 Davies, W., Geol. Mag. 12. II. Vol. V. (1878), Pl. VIII. Fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 451 note 2 Dixon, F., “Geol. and Foss. Sussex” (1850), pl. xxxi. fig. 12.Google Scholar

page 452 note 1 Hulke, J. W., “Note on some Dinosaurian Remains in the Collection of A. Leeds, Esq.,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xliii. (1887), p. 702.Google Scholar

page 452 note 2 Woodward, Smith, “On the Palæontology of Sturgeons,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xi. (1889), p. 31.Google Scholar

page 454 note 1 Blake, J. F., “On the Portland Rocks of England,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxvi. (1880), p. 228 pl. x. fig. 10.Google Scholar