Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T05:04:44.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hecla Hoek Succession in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. B. Harland  and
C. B. Wilson
W. B. Harland
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
C. B. Wilson
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A stratigraphical outline of the Hecla Hoek succession summarizing post-war work in Ny Friesland is presented for the first time. This shows a geosynclinal series of sediments reaching down at least 15,000 m. below Cambrian in a more or less continuous succession. It is compared with other Hecla Hoek successions in Svalbard.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , August 1956 , pp. 265 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blomstrand, C. A., 1864. Geognostiska iakttagelser under en resa till Spetsbergen år 1861. Konglia Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl., iv, No. 6, 1–46.Google Scholar
Bloomer, R. O., and Werner, H. J., 1955. Geology of the Blue Ridge Region in Central Virginia. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., lxvi, 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, G., 1900. Om östra Spetsbergens glaciation under istiden. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh., xxii, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, G. 1923. Topographic et Géologic. Missions suédoise pour la Mésure d'un Arc de Méridien au Spitzberg. Tome II, section IX Stockholm.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, P. E., 1933. The petrology of the Hecla Hook Formation in central Spitsbergen. Geol. Mag., lxx, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, W. L. S., and Edmonds, J. M., 1941. Hecla Hoek rocks of New Friesland (Spitsbergen). Geol. Mag., lxxviii, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frebold, H., 1935. Geologic von Spitzbergen, der Bäreninsel, des König-Karl-und Franz-Joseph-Landes. Geol. der Erde.Google Scholar
Frebold, H., 1951. Geologie des Barentsschelfes. Abhandl. Deutschen Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1950, No. 5. Abhandlungen zur Geotektonik, No. 4.Google Scholar
Garwood, E. J., and Gregory, J. W., 1898. Contributions to the Glacial Geology of Spitsbergen. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., liv, 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, J., 1955. Der “Zentrale Metamorphe Komplex” von NE-Grönland. Teil 1. Die Geologische Karte von Suess Land, Gletscherland und Goodenoughs Land. Medd. om Grøn, lxxiii, No. 3, 1–174.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., 1941. Geological notes on the Stubendorff Mountains, West Spitsbergen. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, lxi, pt. 2, No. 10, 119–129.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1955. Contribution to discussion of Sandford's paper. Proc. Geol. Soc. Lond., No. 1531, 15–16.Google Scholar
Holtedahl, O., 1913. Zur Kenntnis der Karbonablagerungen des westlichen Spitzbergens. II—Allgemeine stratigraphische und tektonische Beobachtungen. Skr. Vidensk. Selsk. Krist. I. Mat. Nat. Kl. 1912, No. 23.Google Scholar
Holtedahl, O. 1920. On the Palaeozoic Series of Bear Island, especially on the Heclahook System. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., V., 121–148.Google Scholar
Holtedahl, O. 1926. Notes on the geology of north-western Spitsbergen. Result. Norske Spitsbergenexsped, i. Skr. Svalb. og Ishavet, No. 8.Google Scholar
Horner, L., 1860. Notes on the rock-specimens from Spitzbergen, collected by Capt. Parry and Lieut. Foster. Proc. Geol. Soc., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., xvi, 442–4.Google Scholar
Katz., H. R., 1953. On the Pre-Cambrian rock-formations belonging to the Caledonian geosyncline of north-east Greenland. Comptes Rendus Int. Geol. Congr. XIXth Sess., 1952, Sect. 1, Fasc. i, 89–102.Google Scholar
Kulling, O., 1932. Några geologiska resultat från expeditionen till Nordostlandet 1931. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh., liv, 138–146.Google Scholar
Kulling, O. 1934. Scientific results of the Swedish-Norwegian Expedition in the summer of 1931. ii, pt. 11. The “Hecla Hoek Formation” round Hinlopenstredet. Geogr. Ann. Stockh., 1934, 161–254.Google Scholar
Major, H., and Winsnes, T. S., 1955. Cambrian and Ordovician fossils from Sørkapp Land, Spitsbergen. Norsk Polarinst. Skr., No. 106.Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, A. E., 1863. Geografisk och geognostisk beskrifning öfver nordöstra delarne af Spetsbergen och Hinlopen Strait. Konglia Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl. Stockholm, iv., No. 7, 1–25.Google Scholar
Odell, N. E., 1927. Preliminary notes on the geology of the eastern parts of central Spitsbergen, with special reference to the problem of the Hecla Hook Formation. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., lxxxiii, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orvin, A. K., 1934. Geology of the Kings Bay region, Spitsbergen, with special reference to the coal deposits. Skr. Svalb. og Ishavet No. 57, 1–195.Google Scholar
Orvin, A. K., 1940. Outline of the geological history of Spitsbergen. Skr. Sralb. og Ishavet, No. 78, 1–57.Google Scholar
Sandford, K. S., 1950. Observations on the geology of the northern part of North-East Land (Spitsbergen). Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., cv (for 1949), 461–491.Google Scholar
Sandford, K. S., 1955. (Abstract). The stratigraphy and structure of the Hecla Hoek Formation and its relationship to a subjacent metamorphic complex in North East Land (Spitsbergen). Proc. Geol. Soc. Lond. No. 1531, p. 14–15.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, G. W., 1922. The pre-Devonian basement complex of central Spitsbergen. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., liii, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, G. W., 1924. The geology of Prince Charles Foreland, Spitsbergen. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., liii, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar