Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:35:30.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.—Restoration of Coryphodon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The genus Coryphodon, established by Owen in 1846, is of great importance alike to geologists and palæntologists. It represents a remarkable group of large ungulate mammals now known to have lived both in America and Europe during early Eocene time. The remains are found in a distinct horizon, essentially the same in each, continent. This horizon is so well marked that geologists may use it as a base for determining the age of other strata. The Coryphodont mammals themselves are of special interest to anatomists, owing to the primitive characters shown in the skeleton. Perhaps their greatest importance lies in the fact, that these large hoofed mammals make their appearance suddenly in great numbers at the base of the Tertiary, without a hint as to their ancestral line, and with only diminutive generalized forms for their Mesozoic predecessors.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1893

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 481 note 1 Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. vol. xii. pp. 417 and 420, 1872.Google Scholar

page 482 note 1 British Fossil Mammals and Birds, p. 299, 1846;Google Scholar and Annales des Sciences Naturelles, tome vi. p. 87, 1856.Google Scholar

page 482 note 2 Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. vol. xvi. p. 616, plates i–ii. 1877.Google Scholar See also Amer. Naturalist, vol. xi. p. 312, and 375, 1877Google Scholar; and Nature, vol. xvii. p. 340, 1878.Google Scholar

page 482 note 3 American Journal, vol. xiv. p. 81, plate iv. 07, 1877.Google Scholar

page 484 note 1 Science, vol. xx. p. 7, 1892Google Scholar; and Bull. Amer. Mus. vol. iv. p. 149, 1892.Google Scholar