Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:31:29.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population structure in artificial selection programmes: simulation studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

F. E. Madalena
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A simulation study was undertaken of methods of subdividing populations into several small sublines and utilizing the variances generated between lines by selecting among them. Crosses of chosen lines were made, and either selection was continued in a single large population (single cycle) or the population was subdivided again (repeated cycles). As a control for the efficiency of these schemes, a single large population was maintained and selected at the same intensity from the outset. Simple models were used of additive or completely dominant genes, usually of equal effect and equally spaced on a single chromosome.

The single and repeated cycle structures give similar results, but the repeated cycle structure is more extreme.

With additive models intense selection between lines gives short-term advances, but causes a reduction in the limit when compared with a single population. The effect on the limit is greatest with free recombination, very small with complete linkage. If no selection is practised between lines the limit is unaffected, but takes longer to attain.

With complete dominance, and the recessive allele initially at low frequency, greater responses from selection are obtained within sublines than in the large population, large gains are made from selection between sublines, and a higher limit can be reached. If the recessive allele is at high initial frequency the subdivision is not beneficial.

Some simple theory is developed to explain these results. It is concluded that subdivision and crossing schemes are unlikely to be very useful except for elimination of deleterious recessive genes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Baker, L. H. & Curnow, R. N. (1968). Choice of population size and use of variation between replicate populations in plant breeding selection programs. Crop Science 9, 555560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C. & Falconer, D. S. (1960). Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice. Genetical Research 1, 262274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, E. R. (1955). Genetic models in relation to animal breeding problems. Biometrics 11, 535536.Google Scholar
Goodwill, R. (1971). Effect of population structure in selection experiments with Tribolium castaneum. Genetics 68, s 24.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. (1963). Cyclical inbreeding with selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Unpublished M.S. thesis. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Madalena, F. E. (1969). Optimum population structure in selection programs. Genetics 61, s 2627.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. (1966). The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genetical Research 8, 269294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J. W. (1972). Optimum selection intensity in breeding programmes. Animal Production 14, 19.Google Scholar
Madalena, F. E. (1970). Studies on the limits to artificial selection. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1970). On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genetical Research 15, 221227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, E. (1966). On the survival of a gene in a subdivided population. Journal of Applied Probability 3, 142155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1952). The effects of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37, 189207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, A. (1960). A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 153, 234249.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1970 a). A theory of limits in artificial selection with many linked loci. In Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics (ed. Kojima, K.), pp. 246288. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1970 b). Some optimum problems in individual selection. Theoretical Population Biology 1, 120127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1939). Genetic principles governing the rate of progress of livestock breeding. Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Production, 32, 1826.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed