Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:36:14.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methionine suppressors in Aspergillus nidulans: their genetics and behaviour in heterokaryons and diploids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. D. Ayling
P. D. Ayling
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University College London, and Department of Botany, University College, Cardiff*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nine methionine mutants of Aspergillus nidulans (six new mutants plus three isolated previously) were examined; five responded to homocysteine, none responded to cystathionine or cysteine.

Ten revertants of one of the mutants, methB3, blocked before homocysteine, were shown to be due to suppressor mutations. The suppressors were divided into six genes on the basis of complementation tests and recombination data. Mutants of two of the genes were semi-dominant in the heterokaryon but recessive in the diploid. Experiments in which conidial ratios in the heterokaryons were determined suggested that semi-dominance of these suppressors is due to a shift in nuclear ratios in the heterokaryon in favour of the suppressor nuclei.

Some of the suppressors were tested for suppression of two other methionine loci; they acted on methG1 blocked before homocysteine, but not on methH2 blocked after homocysteine, although four out of 13 crosses tested gave ambiguous results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 275 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Alderson, T. & Clark, A. M. (1966). Interlocus specificity for chemical mutagens in Aspergillus nidulans. Nature, Lond. 210, 593–595.Google Scholar
Benzer, S. & Champe, S. P. (1962). A change from nonsense to sense in the genetic code. Proc. notn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48, 1114–1121.Google Scholar
Casselton, L. A. & Lewis, D. (1967). Dilution of gene products in the cytoplasm of heterokaryons in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res., Camb. 9, 63–71.Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, A. J. (1968). Gene symbols and nomenclature: proposals and notes on them. Asp. News Letter, no. 9, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, A. J. & Roper, J. A. (1966). A direct determination of nuclear distribution in heterokaryons of Aspergillus nidulans. Genet. Res., Camb. 7, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutterbuck, A. J. & Sinha, U. K. (1966). N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG) as a mutagen for Aspergillus nidulans. Asp. News Letter, no. 7, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
Gajewski, W. & Litwińska, J. (1967). Methionine mutants of Aspergillus nidulans and their suppressors. Asp. News Letter, no. 8, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
Gajewski, W. & Litwińska, J. (1968). Methionine loci and their suppressors in Aspergillus nidulans. Molec. Gen. Genetics 102, 210–220.Google Scholar
Horowitz, N. H. (1947). Methionine synthesis in Neurospora. The isolation of cystathionine. J. biol. Chem. 171, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, S. (1958). Suppressor mutations in some cystine-requiring mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. Genetics 43, 404–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, D. S. & Flavin, M. (1968). Synthesis of cystathionine from O-acetlyhomoserine in Neurospora: a step in methionine biosynthesis. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 31, 124–130.Google Scholar
Kerr, D. & Nagai, S. (1967). Enzymic formation of acetylhomoserine and its utilization for methionine synthesis. Fedn Proc. 26, 387.Google Scholar
Lein, J. & Lein, P. S. (1952). Studies on a suppressor of non-allelic acetate requiring mutants of Neurospora. Proc. notn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 38, 44–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. (1961). Genetic analysis of methionine suppressors in Coprinus. Genet. Res., Camb. 2, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, L. J. (1965). An investigation of the suitability of the suppressors of meth 1 in Aspergillus nidulans for the study of induced and spontaneous mutation. Mutation Res. 2, 192–195.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, M. E. & Pritchard, R. H. (1963). The production and replica plating of micro-colonies of Aspergillus nidulans. Genet. Res., Camb. 4, 320–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morpurgo, G. (1961). Somatic segregation induced by p–fluoro-phenylalanine (PFP). Asp. News Letter, no. 2, p. 10.Google Scholar
Nagai, S. & Flavin, M. (1967). Acetylhomoserine. An intermediate in the fungal biosynthesis of methionine. J. biol. Chem. 242, 3884–3895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontecorvo, G. (1963). Microbial genetics: retrospect and prospect. Proc. R. Soc. B 158, 1–23.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, G., Roper, J. A., Hemmons, L. M., Macdonald, K. D. & Bufton, A. W. J. (1953). The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans. Adv. Genet. 5, 141–238.Google Scholar
Roper, J. A. (1952). Production of heterozygous diploide in filamentous fungi. Experientia 8, 14–15.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, O. H. (1962). Mutagenic action of nitrous acid on Aspergillus nidulans. Genet. Res., Camb. 3, 303–314.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. S. & Pierog, S. (1954). Gene interactions: the mode of action of the suppressor of acetate-requiring mutants of Neurospora crossa. J. gen. Microbici. 10, 221–235.Google Scholar
Wiebers, J. L. & Garner, H. R. (1967). Acyl derivatives of homoserine as substrates for homocysteine synthesis in Neurospora crossa, yeast and Escherichia coli. J. biol. Chem. 242, 5644–5649.Google Scholar
Yanofsky, C. & St Lawrence, P. (1960). Gene action. A. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 311–340.Google Scholar