Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:54:17.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological diversity of xoconostles (Opuntiaspp.) or acidic cactus pears: a Mexican contribution to functionalfoods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

Clemente Gallegos-Vázquez ,
Leia Scheinvar ,
Carlos A. Núñez-Colín  and
Candelario Mondragón-Jacobo
Clemente Gallegos-Vázquez
Affiliation:
Cent. Reg. Univ. Centro Norte, Univ. Auton. Chapingo, Apartado Post. 196, Zacatecas, 98001, Zacatecas, Mexico. [email protected]
Leia Scheinvar
Affiliation:
Jard. Bot., Inst. Biol., Univ. Nac. Auton. México, Ciudad Univ., México D.F., 0451, México
Carlos A. Núñez-Colín
Affiliation:
Campo Exp. Bajío, Inst. Nac. Investig. For. Agríc. Pecu., Apartado Post. 112, Celaya, 38110, Guanajuato, Mexico; [email protected]
Candelario Mondragón-Jacobo*
Affiliation:
Campo Exp. Bajío, Inst. Nac. Investig. For. Agríc. Pecu., Apartado Post. 112, Celaya, 38110, Guanajuato, Mexico; [email protected]
*
*Correspondence and reprints

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction. Xoconostles or acidic cactus pears (Opuntiaspp.) are fruits prized for their fleshy and acidic mesocarp; theyare morphologically different from cactus pears which are sweet, juicyand seedy. Both thrive in semiarid highlands of Central Mexico,tolerate poor soils and scanty rainfall, and have evolved into formalcrops during the last five decades. Wild xoconostles are ubiquitousin Mexican semiarid regions. Domesticated genotypes are found inbackyards and commercial orchards. Folk wisdom attributes xoconostlewith antihypoglycemic effects, cholesterol control and obesity reduction.The peel presents higher antioxidant capacity than strawberry, raspberry,red plum, grapefruit, pear and apple. Our investigation describesthe main cultivars of xoconostles with horticultural value for human consumptionin Central Mexico; it contributes to the elucidation of their morphologicalrelationships. Materials and methods. Twenty-one accessions fromthe Hidalgo and Zacatecas states of Mexico were described using 27 variablesfrom cladodes, flowers and fruits; significant variables were selectedby correlation and PCA, and thereafter a cluster analysis and discriminantcanonical analysis were performed. Results. Thirteen variables werefound to be significant to discriminate accessions: cladode length, numberof rows of areoles, number of areoles in the central row, pericarplength and width, fruit length, fruit diameter, [length / diameter]ratio, areole density, receptacle depth, fruit and peel weight,and pulp acidity. Two canonical roots (Can) explained variability:Can1 (fruit areola density, acidity, number of areole rows, and numberof areoles in the central row) explained 87.55%, and Can2 (peel weight,fruit weight and fruit diameter) explained the remaining 12.45%.Discussion. Can1 was related to plant productivity, while Can2 comprisedmainly fruit quality traits. Both of these traits are of primaryinterest for human utilization and have had a clear effect on domestication. Clustersdid not match the actual taxonomic classification.

Keywords

MexicoOpuntiagenetic resourcesbiodiversityhuman feedingMexiqueOpuntiaressource génétiquebiodiversitéalimentation humaineMéxicoOpuntiarecursos genéticosbiodiversidadalimentación humana
Type
Original article
Information
Fruits , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 109 - 120
Copyright
© 2012 Cirad/EDP Sciences

References

Mondragón-Jacobo, C., Gallegos-Vázquez, C., Reyes-Agüero, J.A., Cactus pear genetic resources the cornerstone of the Mexican cactus pear industry, Acta Hortic. 811 (2009) 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivares-Orozco J.L., Zavaleta-Beckler P., Chimal-Hernández A., Montiel-Salero D., Fierro-Alvarez A., Scheinvar L., Xoconostle: biología y manejo agronómico, Ser. Acad. CBS, no. 45, Dir. Cienc. Biol. Salud, Univ. Autón. Metrop. Unidad Xochimilco, Mex. City, Mex., 2003.
Scheinvar L., Filardo Kerstupp S., Olalde Parra G., Zavaleta Beckler P., Diez especies mexicanas productoras de xoconostles: Opuntia spp. y Cylindropuntia imbricada (Cacteceae), Univ. Nac. Autón. Méx., Univ. Autón. Estado Hidalgo, Univ. Autón. Metrop., Mex. City, Mex., 2009.
Ávalos-Andrade, A., Ramírez-Córdova, Y., Goytia-Jiménez, M.A., Barrientos-Priego, A.F., Saucedo-Veloz, C., Etileno en la abscisión del fruto de tres especies del género Opuntia, Rev. Chapingo (Ser. Hortic.) 12 (2006) 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Pedraza, L.G., Reyes-Agüero, J.A., Aguirre-Rivera, J.R., Pinos-Rodríguez, J.M., Preliminary nutritional and organoleptic assessment of xoconostle fruit (Opuntia spp.) as a condiment or appetizer, Ital. J. Food Sci. 17 (2005) 333–340. Google Scholar
Reyes-Agüero, J.A., Aguirre, R.J.R., Valiente-Banuet, A., Reproductive biology of Opuntia: A review, J. Arid Environ. 64 (2006) 549–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinvar L., Cactaceae, In: Rzedowski J., Calderón de Rzedowski G. (comp. y eds.), La Flora de México, Cent. Reg. Bajío, Inst. Ecol., Esc. Nac. Cienc. Biol., Inst. Politéc. Nac., Mex. City, Mex., 2001, pp. 431–470.
Guzmán-Maldonado, S.H., Morales-Montelongo, A.L., Mondragón-Jacobo, C., Herrera-Hernández, M.G., Guevara-Lara, F., Reynoso-Camacho, R., Physicochemical, nutritional and functional characterization of fruits xoconostle (Opuntia matudae) pears from central-Mexico region, J. Food Sci. 75 (2010) 485–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proteggente, A.L., Pannala, A.S.D., Paganga, G., Uren, L.V., Wagner, E., Wiseman, S., De Put, F.V., Dacombe, C., Rice-Evans, C.A., The antioxidant activity of regularly consumed fruit and vegetables reflects their phenolic and vitamin C composition, Free Radic. Res. 36 (2002) 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimienta-Barrios, E., Méndez-Morán, L., Ramírez-Hernández, B.C., García de Alba-García J.E., Domínguez-Arias R.M., Efecto de la ingestión del fruto de xoconostle (Opuntia joconostle Web.) sobre la glucosa y lípidos séricos, Agrociencia 42 (2008) 645–653.Google Scholar
GallegosVázquez, C., Cervantes-Herrera, J., Méndez-Gallegos, S. de J., La producción de tuna en la región centro norte de México, Geogr. Agríc. 33 (2004) 143–157.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Venegas, G., Ortega-Delgado, M.L., Componentes químicos durante la maduración del fruto de Opuntia joconostle Weber forma cuaresmero, Agrociencia 30 (1996) 541–548.Google Scholar
Gallegos-Vázquez, C., Barrientos-Priego, A.F., Reyes-Agüero, J.A., Núñez-Colín, C.A., Mondragón-Jacobo, C., Clusters of commercial cultivars of cactus pear and xoconostle using UPOV traits, J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 13 (2011) 10–23.Google Scholar
Anon., Cactus pear and xoconostles (Opuntia, Groups 1 & 2), Guidelines to conduct tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, TG/217/1, Int. Union Prot. New Var. Plants, UPOV, Geneva, Switz., 2004.
González-Andrés F., Caracterización morfológica, in: González-Andrés F., Pita Villamil J.M. (Eds.), Conservación y caracterización de recursos filogenéticos, Publ. Inst. Nac. Educ. Agríc., Valladolid, Esp., 2001, pp. 199–217.
Ward, J.H. Jr., Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58 (1963) 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson D.E., Métodos multivariados aplicados al análisis de datos, Int. Thompson Ed., Mex. City, Méx., 1998.
Núñez-Colín, C.A., Nieto-Ángel, R., Barrientos-Priego, A.F., Sahagún-Castellanos, J., Segura, S., González-Andrés, F., Variability of three regional sources of germplasm of Tejocote (Crataegus spp.) from central and southern Mexico, Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 55 (2008) 1159–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon., SAS/STAT software version 9.2: The power to know, SAS Inst., Cary, U.S.A., 2009.
Wallace R.S., Gibson A.C., Evolution and systematic, in: Nobel P.S. (Ed.), Cacti: biology and uses, Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, U.S.A., 2002, pp. 1–22.
Caruso, M.S., Curro, S., Las Casas, G., La Malfa, S., Gentile, A., Microsatellite markers help assess genetic diversity among Opuntia ficus-indica cultivated genotypes and their relation with related species, Plant Syst. Evol. 90 (2010) 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinvar L., Taxonomía de las Opuntias utilizadas, in: Barbera G., Inglese P., Pimienta-Barrios E. (Eds.), Agroecologia, cultivo y usos del nopal, Estud. FAO, Ser. Prod. Prot. Veg. 132, Rome, Italy, 1999, pp. 21–28.
Casas, A., Otero-Arnaiz, A., Perez-Negron, E., Valiente-Banuet, A., In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica, Ann. Bot. 100 (5) (2007) 1101–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimienta-Barrios E., Muñoz-Urías A., Domesticación de nopales tuneros (Opuntia spp.) y descripción de las principales variedades cultivadas, in: Barbera G., Inglese P., Pimienta-Barrios E. (Eds.), Agroecologia, cultivo y usos del nopal, Estud. FAO, Ser. Prod. Prot. Veg. 132, Rome, Italy, 1999, pp. 61–67.
Mondragón-Jacobo, C., Caracterización genética de una colección de nopal (Opuntia spp) de la región centro de México, Agric. Téc. Méx. 28 (2002) 3–14.Google Scholar
Peña-Valdivia, A., Luna-Cavazos, M., Carranza-Sabas, J.A., Reyes-Agüero, J.A., Flores, A., Morphological characterization of Opuntia: a multivariate analysis, J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2008 (1) 1–21.Google Scholar
Valdes-Zepeda, R.D, Blanco-Macias, F., Gallegos-Vazquez, C., Ordenacion y clasificación numérica en nopal tunero mediante atributos de fruto, Rev. Chapingo (Ser. Hortic.) 9 (2) (2003) 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez-Acosta, F., Valdes-Cepeda, R.D.Blanco-Macias, F., Multivariate analysis of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) fruits germplasm collection, Acta Hortic. 581 (2002) 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimienta-Barrios E., El nopal tunero, Colecc. Tiempos Cienc., Univ. Guadalaj., Guadalaj., Mex., 1990, pp. 246.
Bosland P.W., Capsicums: Innovative uses of an ancient crop, in: Janick J. (Ed.), Progress in new crops, ASHS Press, Arlingt., U.S.A., 1996, pp. 479–487.