Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:36:05.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal recovery, clinical recovery and patient-rated measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

M. Slade
M. Slade*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Abstract

This talk will cover two common areas of confusion. First, the relationship between personal recovery and clinical recovery will be described, using recent meta-analytic evidence. It will be argued that personal recovery is not the same as clinical recovery, and that there is now an established policy and practice consensus that supporting personal recovery is the primary aim of mental health systems. Traditional clinical recovery-oriented treatments which target for example symptomatology or relapse prevention can for many people with mental health issues contribute to their recovery at points in their lives, but for others different approaches are needed. This variation in clinical need is addressed in the second area – patient-rated measures. The rationale for measures of experiential knowledge will be given. A distinction will be drawn between Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient-rated experience measures (PREMs), and between peer-developed patient-generated PROMs (PG-PROMs) compared with those developed by non-peer research teams. It will be argued that modern mental health systems should be judged by their impact on recovery, as measured using PROMs and PREMs in preference to staff-rated measures.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 66 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 31st European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2023 , pp. S35
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.