Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:37:38.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0327 – Validity of a Computerized Memory Diagnostic System(mds) : Verbal and Visuospatial Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M.S. Shin
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
S.J. Oh
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
D.Y. Lee
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
J.S. Kwon
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

An aging world population provides challenges for diagnostics within the field of geriatric psychiatry.

Objectives:

The Memory Diagnostic System(MDS) is a computerized cognitive test instrument developed for the detection of amnestic mild cognitive impairment(aMCI) in Korea. In current study, its diagnostic utility for application within Korean clinical practice was evaluated.

Aims:

This study was conducted to evaluate the concurrent and discriminant validity of computerized verbal and visuospatial memory tests of the MDS.

Methods:

To determine the concurrent validity, we recruited normally aging individuals and conducted a correlation analysis between these participants’ MDS scores and their scores on well-known measures used to assess each component construct: the Korean Auditory Verbal Learning Test (K-AVLT) and the Korean Rey Complex Figure Test (K-CFT). We also evaluated aMCI patients in comparison to healthy controls using the MDS as a screening instrument.

Results:

Correlations between immediate recall, delayed recall, and delayed recognition scores on the computerized verbal memory test and the corresponding scores on the K-AVLT were 0.74, 0.61, and 0.50, respectively (p<0.01, n=30). The correlation between recognition scores (as measured by the computerized visuospatial memory test) and recall scores (as measured by the K-CFT) was 0.48 (immediate), 0.48 (delayed; p<0.01, n=30). The MDS was also useful for determining differential diagnoses between aMCI patients and healthy controls, suggesting the discriminant validity of the MDS.

Conclusions:

The MDS is a useful instrument for discriminating between aMCI cases and healthy controls within clinical practice.

Type
P05 - Cognitive Neuroscience
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.