Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:01:38.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1081 – Detention And Mental Health Of Torture Survivors - What Do We Know And What Do We Do?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Engberg*
Affiliation:
Research Department, Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Torture survivors often present a complex clinical picture with mental and physical symptoms and illness in addition to social incapacities. Torture survivors can be subjected to deprivation of liberty in a variety of situations. Detention might remind the torture survivor of former torture experiences and thus add further to the strain of being detained.

Objective

To evaluate and discuss the present knowledge of mental health consequences of detention of torture survivors and to present and discuss practices relating to detention.

Aim

To focus attention on existing evidence and problematic practices in relation to this.

Methods

Results from key publications within the field will be resumed and discussed and implications outlined.

Results

Research on the impact of detention on torture survivors is almost non-existent. A negative impact of detention on mental health of torture survivors can however be deducted mainly from the existing evidence on asylum seekers. Whether screening for torture experiences and following systematic monitoring of mental health are going on worldwide remains obscure, but from a Danish perspective it is likely that torture survivors are not identified.

Conclusion

Torture survivors constitute a vulnerable group mentally, physically and socially. A negative impact of detention on mental health can be deducted mainly from studies on asylum seekers. Identification of torture survivors is necessary before decision on detention is taken. Scientific evidence on the subject is missing. Research initiatives and monitoring of practices are necessary.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.