Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:27:04.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sedation with target-controlled propofol infusion during shoulder surgery under interscalene brachial plexus block in the sitting position: report of a series of 140 patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2005

S. Vincent ,
D. Laurent  and
B. Francis
S. Vincent
Affiliation:
Clinique Générale, Department of Anaesthesiology, Annecy, France
D. Laurent
Affiliation:
Clinique Générale, Department of Anaesthesiology, Annecy, France
B. Francis
Affiliation:
Hôpital Tenon, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Paris, France
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to assess target-controlled propofol infusion as a technique of sedation for shoulder surgery under interscalene brachial plexus block in the sitting position and to evaluate the effect of sedation on hypotensive/bradycardic events during this procedure. Methods: One hundred and forty patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery in the sitting position under interscalene brachial plexus block (with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%) were prospectively enrolled. All patients were premedicated with hydroxyzine 1 mg kg−1, none received beta-blockers. No patients were given atropine except for the patients who experienced a vasovagal event either during the block procedure or intravenous catheter placement. The target-controlled propofol infusion was started immediately after positioning the patient on the operating table. The initial target concentration was 1 μg mL−1. The infusion rate was adjusted every 15 min by increasing or decreasing the target concentration by 0.2 μg mL−1 steps to maintain the patient rousable to verbal commands (score of 3 on Wilson sedation scale). The following parameters were assessed: minimal, maximal, optimal target concentration, respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, total propofol dose, additional alfentanil needs, occurrence of hypotensive/bradycardic events, complications. Results are mean ± SD. Statistical analysis used t-test and χ2-tests. Results: The optimal propofol target concentration was 0.8 μg mL−1. No respiratory complications or conversion to general anaesthesia was reported. Two patients experienced transient and inconsequential intraoperative agitation. The incidence of hypotensive/bradycardic events during the procedure was 5.7% (eight patients). Conclusion: Target-controlled propofol infusion (0.8–0.9 μg mL−1) following hydroxyzine premedication is a safe and effective technique for sedation when combined with interscalene brachial plexus block during shoulder surgery in the sitting position.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS, target controlledPROPOFOLSURGICAL PROCEDURES OPERATIVE, shoulderANAESTHESIA CONDUCTION, nerve block, interscalene brachial plexus blockSYNCOPE, VASOVAGALHYPOTENSION
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 22 , Issue 11 , November 2005 , pp. 853 - 857
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Alessio JG, Rosenblum M, Shea KP, Freitas DG. A retrospective comparison of interscalene block and general anesthesia for ambulatory surgery shoulder arthroscopy. Reg Anesth 1995; 20: 62–68.Google Scholar
Skyhar MJ, Atcheck DW, Warren RF et al. Shoulder arthroscopy with the patient in the beach chair position. Arthroscopy 1988; 4: 256–259.Google Scholar
Skipsey IG, Colvin JR, Mackenzie N, Kenny GN. Sedation with propofol during surgery under local blockade. Assessment of a target-controlled infusion system. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 210–213.Google Scholar
Newson C, Joshi G, Victory R, White PF. Comparison of propofol administration techniques for sedation during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 486–491.Google Scholar
Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Colnaghi E, Cerati V, Torri G. Clinical assessment of target-controlled infusion of propofol during monitored anesthesia care. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 235–239.Google Scholar
Janzen PR, Hall WJ, Hopkins PM. Setting targets for sedation with a target-controlled propofol infusion. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 666–669.Google Scholar
D'Alessio JG, Weller RS, Rosenblum M. Activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex in the sitting position for shoulder arthroscopy using interscalene block. Anesth Analg 1995: 80: 1158–1162.Google Scholar
Jochum D, Roedel R, Gleyze P, Bailliet JM. Interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery. A prospective study of a consecutive series of 167 patients (French). Ann Fr Anesth Réanim 1997; 16: 114–119.Google Scholar
Kinsella SM, Tuckey JP. Perioperative bradycardia and asystole: relationship to vasovagal syncope and the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 859–868.Google Scholar
Winnie AP. Regional anesthesia. Surg Clin North Am 1975; 54: 861–892.Google Scholar
Wilson E, David A, Mackenzie N, Grant IS. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 48–52.Google Scholar
Urmey WF, Tals JA, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 498–503.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuijs D, Sarton E, Teppema L et al. Propofol for monitored anesthesia care: implications on hypoxic control of cardiorespiratory responses. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 46–54.Google Scholar
Sà Rêgo M, Watcha M, White PF. The changing role of monitored anesthesia care in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 1020–1036.Google Scholar
Passot S, Servin S, Allary R et al. Target-controlled versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1212–1216.Google Scholar
Liguori GA, Kahn RL, Gordon J, Gordon MA, Urban MK. The use of metoprolol and glycopyrrolate to prevent hypotensive/bradycardic events during shoulder arthroscopy in the sitting position under interscalene block. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1320–1325.Google Scholar
Sia S, Sarro F, Lepri A, Bartoli M. The effect of exogenous epinephrine on the incidence of hypotensive/bradycardic events during shoulder surgery in the sitting position during interscalene block. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 583–588.Google Scholar