Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:29:13.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation Efficiencies of Old Globular Clusters – form Dwarf to GiantGalaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

I. Georgiev*
Affiliation:
Argelander Institut für Astronomie de Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53225 Bonn, Germany
T. Puzia
Affiliation:
Herzberg Institute for Astrophysics, National Research Council, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada
P. Goudfrooij
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
M. Hilker
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Get access

Abstract

For the full galaxy mass range, we find that previously observed trends of globular cluster (GC) system scaling parameters (number, luminosity or mass of all GCs in a galaxy normalized to the host galaxy luminosity or mass, e.g. SL) as a function of galaxy mass, holds irrespective of galaxy type or environment. The SL value of early-type galaxies is, on average, twice that of late-types. We derive theoretical predictions which describe remarkably well the observed GC system scaling parameter distributions given an assumed GC formation efficiency (η), i.e. the ratio of total mass in GCs to galaxy halo mass. It has a mean value of η ≃ 5.5 × 10−5, and increasing scatter toward low galaxy mass. The excess η-values of some massive galaxies compared to expectations from the mean model prediction, may be attributed to an efficient GC formation, inefficient production of field stars, accretion of low-mass high-η galaxies or likely a mixture of all these effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EAS, EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Georgiev, I.Y., Puzia, T.H., Goudfrooij, P., & Hilker, M., 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1967
Harris, W.E., 1991, ARA&A, 29, 543CrossRef
Miller, B.W., & Lotz, J.M., 2007, ApJ, 670, 1074CrossRef
Peng, E.W., Jordan, A., Cote, P., et al., 2008, ApJ, 681, 197CrossRef
McLaughlin, D.E., 1999, AJ, 117, 2398CrossRef
Forbes, D.A., 2005, ApJ, 635, L137CrossRef
Pipino, A., Puzia, T.H., & Matteucci, F., 2007, ApJ, 665, 295CrossRef
Muratov, A.L., & Gnedin, O.Y., 2010, ApJ, 718, 1266CrossRef
Georgiev, I.Y., Goudfrooij, P., Puzia, T.H., & Hilker, M., 2008, AJ, 135, 1858CrossRef
Georgiev, I.Y., Puzia, T.H., Hilker, M., & Goudfrooij, P., 2009, MNRAS, 392, 879CrossRef
Dekel, A., & Birnboim, Y., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2CrossRef