Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:59:47.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wilderness Protection: An Example from the Southern Sierra Nevada, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

David J. Parsons
David J. Parsons
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, National Park Service, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Three Rivers, California 93271, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The increasing popularity of national parks and other wilderness areas has focused attention on the need for effective wilderness management policies. In many cases active management programmes are required to assure that naturally functioning ecosystems are preserved. External influences such as air pollution, exotic species, and impacts from visitor-use, must be understood and controlled. This paper reviews a case-example of management strategies that were utilized to minimize visitor use-impacts in the backcountry wilderness of Kings Canyon National Park in the southern Sierra Nevada of California.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 1983 , pp. 23 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babich, H., Davis, D.L. & Stotzky, G. (1980). Acid precipitation: Causes and consequences. Environment. 22 (4), pp. 6–13, 40–41.Google Scholar
Bratton, S.P. (1975). The effect of the European wild boar, Sus scrofa, on Gray Beech Forests in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 55, pp. 1356–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, S.P., Hickler, M.G. & Graves, J.H. (1978). Visitor impact on backcountry campsites in the Great Smoky Mountains. Environ. Manage., 2, pp. 431–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, S.P., Stromberg, L.L. & Harmon, M.E. (1982). Firewood-gathering impacts in backcountry campsites in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environ. Manage. 6, pp. 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B.C. (1900). Another paradise. Sierra Club Bull., 3 (2), pp. 135–49.Google Scholar
Burke, M.T. (1982). The vegetation of the Rae Lakes Basin, Southern Sierra Nevada. Madroño, 29, pp. 164–76.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1981). Managing ecological impacts at wilderness campsites: An evaluation of techniques. J. For., 79 (2), pp. 86–9.Google Scholar
Elsasser, A.B. (1972). Indians of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Sequoia Natural History Assoc., Three Rivers, California, USA: 56 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Franklin, J.F. (1977). The Biosphere Reserve program in the United States. Science, 195, pp. 262–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H. & Lucas, R.C. (1978). Wilderness Management. USDA Forest Service Misc. Publ. No. 1365, xi + 381 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Huen-Po, W. (1980). Nature conservation in China: The present situation. Parks, 5, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Ittner, R., Potter, D.R., Agee, J.K. & Anschell, S. (Ed.) (1979). Recreational Impact on Wildlands—Conference Proceedings. USDA Forest Service Publ. No. R-6-001-1979, 341 pp.Google Scholar
IUCN (1971). United Nations List of National Parks and Equivalent Reserves. Hayez, Brussels, Belgium: 601 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
James, T.D., Smith, S.W., Mackintosh, E.E., Hoffman, M.K. & Monti, P. (1979). Effects of camping recreation on soil, jack pine, and understory vegetation in a northwestern Ontario Park. Forest Sci., 25, pp. 333–49.Google Scholar
Jubenville, A. (1974). Conservation organizations and wilderness use—a time for policy appraisal? Environmental Conservation. 1 (2), pp. 93–9, 4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, W.W. (1977). Opinions and Preferences of Visitors Toward Alternatives for Limiting Use in the Backcountry of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. M.S. thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA: (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Leopold, A.S., Cain, S.A., Cottam, C., Gabrielson, I.N. & Kimball, T.L. (1963). Wildlife management in the national parks. Trans. No. Amer. Wild. Nat. Resour. Conf., 28, pp. 28–45.Google Scholar
McQuaid-Cook, J. (1978). Effects of hikers and horses on mountain trails. J. Environ. Manage., 6, pp. 469–88.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J. (1981). The role of fire management in maintaining natural ecosystems. Pp. 469–88 in Fire Regimes and Ecosystem Properties (Ed. Mooney, H., Bonnickson, T.M., Christenson, N.L., Lotan, J.E. & Reiners, W.A.). USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Report WO-26, Washington, DC, USA: vi + 593 pp.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J. & DeBenedetti, S.H. (1979). Wilderness protection in the high Sierra: Effects of a 15-year closure. Pp. 1313–7 in Proc. First Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks (Ed. Linn, R.). USDI National Park Service Trans, and Proc. Series No. 5, Washington, DC, USA: xxxiv + 1325 pp.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J. & MacLeod, S. A. (1980). Measuring impacts of wilderness use. Parks, 5 (3), pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J., Stohlgren, T.J. & Fodor, P.A. (1981). Establishing backcountry use-quotas: An example from Mineral King, California. Environ. Manage., 5, pp. 335–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundel, P.W., Parsons, D.J. & Gordon, D.T. (1977). Montane and subalpine vegetation of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges. Pp. 559–99 in Terrestrial Vegetation of California (Ed. Barbour, M. & Major, J.). Johns Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: ix + 1002 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Shechter, M. & Lucas, R.C. (1978). Simulation of Recreational Use for Park and Wilderness Management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xix + 220 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Silverman, G. & Erman, D.C. (1979). Alpine lakes in Kings Canyon National Park, California: Baseline conditions and possible effects of visitor use. J. Environ. Manage, 8, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. & Baden, J. (1977). Rationing Wilderness Use: Methods, Problems, and Guidelines. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-192: 20 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, D.H. (1980). Trees or Timber? The Story of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Sequoia Natural History Association, Three Rivers, California, USA: 56 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.B. (1972). No vacancy in the wilderness. Sierra Club Bull., 67 (9), pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.P. & Erman, D.C. (1979). The response of benthic plants to past levels of human use in high mountain lakes in Kings Canyon National Park, California, USA. J. Environ. Manage., 9, pp. 271–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.P. & Erman, D.C. (1980). The littoral bottom fauna of high-elevation lakes in Kings Canyon National Park. Calif. Fish and Game, 66 (2), pp. 112–9.Google Scholar
Vankat, J.L. & Major, J. (1978). Vegetation changes in Sequoia National Park, California. J. Biogeog., 5, pp. 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanWagtendonk, J.W. (1981). The effects of use limits on backcountry visitation trends in Yosemite National Park. Leisure Sciences, 4 (3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P.S. & Bratton, S.P. (1980). After preservation: philosophical and practical problems of change. Biol. Cons., 18, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, B.E. & Marr, J.W. (1970). Effects of human activities on alpine tundra ecosystems in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Biological Conservation, 2 (4), pp. 257–65, 7 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar