Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:42:07.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Protection of Scenic Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Philip Dearden
Philip Dearden
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1W5, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This essay has sought to draw together some of the reasons behind the recent upsurge in interest in the systematic evaluation of scenic beauty. It has covered a wide range of disciplines, because of the multi-faceted nature of feelings about landscape. These feelings have been synthesized into four themes representing landscape as a non-renewable resource, as a recreational resource, as a spiritual resource, and finally as a historical resource. Undoubtedly many other equally valid reasons exist as to why the visual resource of the landscape should be recognized as an important consideration in land-use planning decisions.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Summer 1980 , pp. 153 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. H. (1968). American Law of Zoning. The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.: xii + 186 pp.Google Scholar
Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley & Sons, London, U.K.: xiii + 293 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barry, R. G. & Chorley, R. J. (1968). Atmosphere, Weather and Climate. Methuen, London, U.K.: 319 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.) (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Halsted Press, New York, N.Y.: viii + 340 pp.Google Scholar
Blake, P. (1966). God's Own Junkyard: The Planned Deterioration of the American Landscape. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, N.Y.: xiii + 259 pp.Google Scholar
Brandt, A. (1977). Views. Atlantic Advocate, 07, pp. 4669, illustr.Google Scholar
British Columbia Land Commission (1975). Keeping the Options Open, Department of the Environment, Burnaby, British Columbia: 16 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Broughton, R. (1972). Aesthetics and environmental law: decisions and values. Land and Water Law Review, 7, pp. 451–500.Google Scholar
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (1967). Outdoor Recreation Trends. Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.: 67 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Calvin, J. S., Dearinger, J. A. & Curten, M. E. (1972). An attempt at assessing preferences for natural landscape, Environment and Behaviour, 4, pp. 467–70.Google Scholar
Carruth, D. B. (1979). Assessing scenic quality: transmission-line siting. Landscape, 22, pp. 1–2, illustr.Google Scholar
Cerny, J. W. (1974). Scenic analysis and assessment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 7, pp. 221–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, G. (1958). Remembered landscapes. Landscape, 7, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
Commoner, B. (1972). The Closing Circle: The Environmental Crisis and Its Cure. Cope, New York, N.Y.: xiii + 343 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dearden, P. (1976). Recreational resources in Saanich Municipality. Pp. 87–117 in Landscape and Habitat Survey (Ed. Dearden, P.). Saanich Municipality, British Columbia: xii + 137 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dearden, P. (1977). Landscape Aesthetics. Council of Planning Librarians Bibliography 1220, Monticello, Illinois: 19 pp.Google Scholar
Dearden, P. (1978). The ecological component in land-use planning: A conceptual framework. Biol. Conserv., 14, pp. 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, P. (in press). A statistical technique for the evaluation of the visual quality of the landscape for land-use planning purposes. J. of Environ. Manag.Google Scholar
Dearden, P. & Rosenblood, L. (in press). Some observations on multivariate techniques in landscape evaluation. Regional Studies.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. & Ehrlich, A. H. (1972). Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology. Freeman, San Francisco, California: xiv + 509 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Eitel, E. J. (1873). Feng Shui or the Rudiments of Natural Science in China. Lane, Crawford, Hong Kong: vii + 139 pp.Google Scholar
Ghent, J. F. (1968). Aesthetic objectives or considerations as affecting validity of zoning ordinance. American Law Report Annotations, 21, pp. 1222–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. B. (1965). National beauty—message from the President of the United States. Congressional Record, 02 8, pp. 2085–9.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (1973). Cognitive maps, human needs, and the designed environment. Pp. 151–69 in Environmental Design Research (Ed. Preiser, W. F. E.). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania: xvi + 390 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1978). Humanscape: Environments for People. Wadsworth, Belmont, California: xv + 679 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W. (1966). The pursuit of beauty in the environment. Landscape, 16, pp. 21–6.Google Scholar
Lai, C. Y. D. (1976). A feng-shui model as a location index. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 64, pp. 506–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighty, L. L. (1971). Aesthetics as a legal basis for environmental control. Wayne Law Review, 17, pp. 1347–96.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1925). Conserving the covered wagon. Sunset, 54, pp. 21–3.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. F., Lowenthal, D. & Tuan, Y. F. (1913). Visual Blight in America. Research Paper 23, Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C.: 66 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Litton, R. B. (1968). Forest landscape description and inventories. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper PSW-49. Pac. S.W. For. and Range Exp. Sta., Berkeley, California: xi + 121 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Litton, R. B. (1974). Visual vulnerability of forest landscapes. J. Forestry, 72, pp. 392–7.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D. &. Prince, H. C. (1964). The English landscape. Geogr. Rev., 54, pp. 309–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, D. &. Prince, H. C. (1965). English landscape tastes. Geog. Rev., 55, pp. 186–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. C. (1970). User Evaluation of campgrounds in Two Michigan National Forests. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper NC-44, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St Paul, Minnesota: x + 45 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with Nature. The Falcon Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: xii + 180 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universal Books, New York, N.Y.: 205 pp.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, J. (1971). Perspectives on Resource Management. Pion Press, London, U.K.: xii + 281 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. (1974). Thoughts towards a philosophy of nature conservation. Biol. Conserv., 9, pp. 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, M. J. (1973). Aesthetics in Environmental Planning. Prepared for Office of Research and Development, U.S. E.P.A., Washington, D.C.: xi + 188 pp.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. G., Laurie, I. C., Wager, J. F. & Traill, A. L. (1976). Landscape Evaluation. Centre for Urban and Regional Research, Manchester, U.K.: 303 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, D. L., Ullrich, J. R. & Benson, R. E. (1976). Esthetic evaluation of timber harvesting in the northern rockies—a progress report. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Note 1 NT 203, 21 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W. R. D. (1975). Social Sciences and Resources Management in Canada: The Need for Vision. Paper delivered at National Social Science Conference on Social Science and Public Policy in Canada, Ottawa, 20–23 11 1975, 50 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Shafer, E. L. & Mietz, J. (1970). It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photography. Forest Service Research Paper NE-162: Upper Darby, Pa., Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: 19 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Shepard, P. & McKinley, D. (1969). The Subversive Science Essays Toward an Ecology of Man. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts: xiii + 241 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Stillman, C. W. (1975). This fair land. Pp. 18–20 in landscape Assessment (Ed. Zube, E. H., Brush, R. O. & Fabos, J. G.). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: xiii + 356 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
USDA Forest Service (1973). National Forest Landscape Management, Volume II. U.S.D.A. Handbook 462, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: 47 pp.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1951). The Religion of China. Macmillan, New York, N.Y.: xliii + 308 pp.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics—the environment as a source of affect. Pp. 37–82 in Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. I: Advances in Theory and Research (Ed. Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J. F.). Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.: xiv + 376 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. K. (1925). The Geographical Lore of the Time of the Crusades: A Study in the History of Medieval Science and Tradition in Western Europe. American Geographical Society, New York, N.Y.: xv + 194 pp., illustr.Google Scholar