Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:30:23.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Ecosystem Structure and Function in the Management of Water Quality in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

S. V. Rama Rao ,
S. K. Sharma ,
V. P. Singh  and
L. P. Mall
S. V. Rama Rao
Affiliation:
Respectively Senior Research Fellow, Teacher Research Fellow, Reader, & Professor and Head, School of Studies in Botany, Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.) 456010, India.
S. K. Sharma
Affiliation:
Respectively Senior Research Fellow, Teacher Research Fellow, Reader, & Professor and Head, School of Studies in Botany, Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.) 456010, India.
V. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Respectively Senior Research Fellow, Teacher Research Fellow, Reader, & Professor and Head, School of Studies in Botany, Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.) 456010, India.
L. P. Mall
Affiliation:
Respectively Senior Research Fellow, Teacher Research Fellow, Reader, & Professor and Head, School of Studies in Botany, Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.) 456010, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term ecosystem integrity may be defined as the maintenance of the community structure and function that is characteristic of a particular locality or habitat. The study of aquatic ecosystem integrity in the rivers and lakes of India holds a bright prospect for the evaluation and management of the quality of our water.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Winter 1979 , pp. 293 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beak, T. W., DeCourval, C. & Cooke, N. E., (1959). Pollution monitoring and prevention by use of bivariate control charts. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 31(12), pp. 1383–7.Google Scholar
Beck, W. M. (1954). Studies in stream pollution biology. I: A simplified classification of organisms. Quart. J. Fla Acad. Sci., 17(4), pp. 211–27.Google Scholar
Beck, W. M. (1955). Suggested methods for reporting biotic data. Sewage and Industrial wastes, 27(10), pp. 1193–7.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. Jr, (1965). The Protozoa of the Conestoga Basin. Not. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 375, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. Jr, (1977). Quantification of biological integrity. Pp. 171–86 in The Integrity of Water (Ed. Ballentine, R. K. & Guarraia, L. J.). U.S. Govt Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: viii + 299 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gaufin, A. R. (1956). Aquatic macroinvertebrate communities as indicators of organic pollution in Lytle Creek. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 28(7), pp. 906–24.Google Scholar
Gaufin, A. R. & Tarzwell, C. M. (1952). Aquatic invertebrates as indicators of stream pollution. Public Health Rep., 67, pp. 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G. (1959). Species abundance and community organization. Ecology, 40(3), pp. 404–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, P. (1908), Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat., 44, pp. 223–70.Google Scholar
Kaushik, N. K. & Hynes, H. B. N. (1968). Experimental study of the role of autumn-shed leaves in aquatic environments. J. Ecology, 56, pp. 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolkwitz, R. & Marsson, M. (1908). Ökologie der Pflanzlichen Saprobien. Berichte der Deutschen Bot. Ges., 26a, pp. 505–19.Google Scholar
Kolkwitz, R. & Marsson, M. (1909). Ökologie der Tierischen Saprobien. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. und Hydrogr., 2, pp. 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. & Gheraldi, R. J. (1964). A table for calculating the ‘equitability’ component of species diversity. J. Animal Ecology, 33(2), pp. 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & MacArthur, J. W. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42(3), pp. 594–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1963). An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17, pp. 373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. (1967). An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology, 48(3), pp. 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, B. J. (1965). Community Structure of Benthic Macro-invertebrates in a Stream Receiving Oil-field Brines. Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater: ill + 52 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. Gen. Systems, 3, pp. 37–71.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. (1956). Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol. Oceanogr., 1, pp. 102–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, R. (1949). A proposed biological measure of stream conditions based on the survey of the Conestoga Basin, Lancaster County, Pa. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 101, pp. 277–341.Google Scholar
Patrick, R., Hohn, M. H. & Wallace, J. H. (1954). A new method for determining the pattern of diatom flora. Not. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 259, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Patten, B. C. (1962). Species diversity in net phytoplankton of Raritan Bay. J. Mar. Res., 20(1), pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
Pileou, E. C. (1966). Species diversity and pattern diversity in the study of ecological succession. J. Theoretical Biology, 10, pp. 370–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pileou, E. C. (1969). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection. J. Theoretical Biology, 13, pp. 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, F. W. (1948). The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology, 29, pp. 254–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, F. W. (1962). The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology, 43(2), Part I pp. 185–215, Part II pp. 410–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S. V. R., Singh, V. P. & Mall, L. P. (1978a). Pollution studies of River Khan. I: Biological assessment of pollution. Water Research, 12(8), pp. 555–9.Google Scholar
Rao, S. V. R., Singh, V. P. & Mall, L. P. (1978b). Biological methods for monitoring water pollution levels: Studies at Ujjain. Pp. 341–8 in Glimpses of Ecology: Professor R. Misra Commemoration Volume (Ed. Singh, J. S. & Gopal, B.). International Scientific Publishers, Jaipur 302004, India: xv + 592 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, I11.: vi + 125 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilhm, J. L. (1965). Species Diversity of Benthic Macro-invertebrates in a Stream Receiving Domestic and Oil Refinery Effluents, Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma: iii + 49 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilhm, J. L. & Dorris, T. C. (1968). Biological parameters for water quality criteria. BioScience, 18(6), pp. 477–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, C. B. (1955). Stream biota and stream pollution. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 27(11), pp. 1270–8.Google Scholar