Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:06:49.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Trends in Preserved Natural Areas in the U.S.S.R.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Philip R. Pryde
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U.S.A.

Extract

Large natural preserves, known as zapovedniki, represent the main territorial entities employed in biosphere preservation in the Soviet Union. In the past decade, a large expansion of the zapovedniki system has taken place, 35 new preserves totalling 4,477,000 ha having been created. In all, the system totalled (in 1976) 107 preserves covering about nine million hectares. The period since 1970 has also seen the creation of the U.S.S.R.'s first three national parks, one in each of the three Baltic republics.

Both zapovedniki and national parks in the Soviet Union are still in the process of having uniform administrative policies formulated for their management, which represents a difficult task in view of the fact that they have traditionally been managed by a wide variety of concerned agencies.

The zapovedniki network represents one of the great biosphere preservation systems of the world, and remaining problems associated with ecosystem management, tourism, economic uses, and administrative coordination, are being given thoughtful attention.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannikov, A. G. (1974). Po zapovednikam Sovetskogo Soyuza. ‘Mysl’, Moscow: 237 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Belousova, L. S. (1967). Ob organizatsii prirodnykh parkov v Sovetskom Soyuze. Pp. 144–54 in Shaposhnikov, L. K. (Ed.), Primechatel'nyye prirodnyye landshafty SSSR i ikh okhrana. ‘Nauka’, Moscow: 174 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Borissoff [Borisov], V. A. (1971). Soviet system of protected natural areas. National Parks and Conservation Magazine, 45(6), pp. 814.Google Scholar
Borissoff [Borisov], V. A. (1973). Some aspects of legal protection of natural areas in the U.S.S.R. Pp. 21–8 in Legal and Administrative Measures for Protecting the Environment. (JPRS-59436.) Joint Publications Research Service, Arlington, Virginia: 28 pp.Google Scholar
Loodus, Eesti, 05 1975, p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isakov, Yu. A. (1975). Nauchnyye osnovy sokhraneniya prirodnykh ekosistem v zapovednikakh. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 1975(3), pp. 61–9.Google Scholar
Kumari, E. (1974). Man-made ecosystems and nature conservation, with special reference to Matsula Bay, Estonian SSR. Environmental Conservation, 1(1), pp. 31–6, 6 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryde, P. R. (1967). The first Soviet national park. National Parks Magazine, 41(236), pp. 20–3.Google Scholar
Pryde, P. R. (1972). Conservation in the Soviet Union. Cambridge University Press, New York: xv + 301 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Zapovedniki, Zapovedno-Okhotnichi Khozyaistva i natsionalnyye parki SSR’ (1976). List prepared by Tsentralnaya Laboratoriya Okhrany Prirody, Moscow: 4 pp. (typescript).Google Scholar