Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:48:00.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One Lump or Two?

A discussion of solid, hyphenated and open compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Brian Poole
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a well-known and much discussed article, the philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote as follows (Russell, 1952):

If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes.

Setting aside Russell's reasons for writing this sentence (in context, to do with both the burden of proof and the existence or otherwise of a deity) I would like to focus on what, in the above extract, is a single word: ‘teapot’. If you, as a reader and no doubt writer of the English language, were required to convey in writing the same concept (a ceramic or metal receptacle with a handle, spout and lid, in which tea is brewed and from which it is poured) would you go for ‘teapot’, ‘tea-pot’ or ‘tea pot’? In other words, to use a phrase commonly heard when the amount of sugar in a cup of tea is discussed, do you think teapot/tea pot should be one lump or two?

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 51 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

British National Corpus via Brigham Young University (BNC-BYU). Online at <https://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/> (Accessed January 5, 2019).+(Accessed+January+5,+2019).>Google Scholar
Good, E. n.d. ‘Grammar tips: hyphens in compound adjectives.’ Online at <https://www.grammar.com/compound-adjectives/> (Accessed December 10, 2018).+(Accessed+December+10,+2018).>Google Scholar
Hill, B. 2015. ‘Compound words – Using this cheat sheet is not cheating.’ The Editor's Blog, August 15. Online at <https://theeditorsblog.net/2015/08/15/compound-words-using-this-cheat-sheet-is-not-cheating/> (Accessed January 5, 2019).+(Accessed+January+5,+2019).>Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries. n.d. ‘One word or two?’ Online at <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/spelling/one-word-or-two> (Accessed December 17, 2018).+(Accessed+December+17,+2018).>Google Scholar
Poole, B. 2017. ‘Emerging preoccupations, developing lexicon.’ English Today, 33(2), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. 2009. ‘50 Years of stupid grammar advice.’ The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 17.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S. 1973. A University Grammar of English. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1952. ‘Is there a God?’ Online at <https://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/religion/br/br_god.html> (Accessed May 1, 2019).+(Accessed+May+1,+2019).>Google Scholar
Strunk, W. & White, E. B. 2000. The Elements of Style (4th edn.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Toor, R. 2018. ‘Scholars talk writing: Hyphens, Oxford commas, and pronoun preferences.’ The Chronicle of Higher Education. December 5.Google Scholar