We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry27, 195–236.Google Scholar
Coles, D'Jaris Renee. 1998. Barrier constraints on negative concord in African-American English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2000. Negation and OV order in late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics36, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2002. Negated subjects and object positions in 15th century English. Language Variation and Change14, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Clause structure, expletives and verb movement. In Abraham, Werner, Epstein, Samuel David, Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Zwart, Jan-Wouter (eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, 167–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 2000. Jespersen's cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In Pintzuk, Susan, Tsoulas, George & Warner, Anthony (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 51–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 2000. Standardisation and the language of early statutes. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 117–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2000. Quantifier movement in Icelandic. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 255–92. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar