Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:09:59.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXIV.—The Innervation of the Human Quiescent Nipple, with Notes on Pigmentation, Erection, and Hyperneury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

E. P. Cathcart ,
F. W. Gairns  and
H. S. D. Garven
E. P. Cathcart
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow.
F. W. Gairns
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow.
H. S. D. Garven
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been known from antiquity that involution of the uterus is aided by putting the child to the breast, and the work of Moir (1933) has demonstrated conclusively that suckling brings about waves of contraction of the puerperal uterus. Since suckling must necessarily involve stimulation of the nipple, it seemed of interest to know what sensory apparatus is present in the nipple to receive these stimuli. While histological studies of the mammary gland itself have been numerous, only slight attention has been paid to the histological structure of the areola and the nipple.

It must be appreciated from the outset that the present study is devoted to the innervation of the nipple in the quiescent breast. There may be considerable change during pregnancy and lactation, not only in the size of the organ and its epithelium but also in the other structures. It has been shown that there is an increase in the number of nerve-fibres in the actively secreting mammary tissue, and it is possible that there is an increase in the nerve-structures of the nipple also. The richness of the innervation in the quiescent nipple certainly makes a further study of these nerve-structures during pregnancy and lactation of great interest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , 1949 , pp. 699 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Belonoschkin, B., 1933. “Physiologisch-Anatomische Untersuchungen über die Empfänger der Kaltempnndung”, Zeits.f. Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, XVIII, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, B., and Guldberg, G., 1933. “Die Ursache der Schwangerschaftshyper-Pigmentierung”, Klin. Woch., I, 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, B., and Schrafl, A., 1932. Arch. f. Dermatol., 165, 268, cit. Bloch u. Guldberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeke, J., 1940. Problems of Nervous Anatomy, Oxford Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
Clark, W. E., Gros, Le, 1939. The Tissues of the Body, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, C., 1855. Beitr. z. Anat. u. Physiol. (Eckhardt) Giessen, cit. Schäfer's Textbook of Physiol., I, 663.Google Scholar
Eggeling, H. Von, 1927. “Die Milchdrüse”, Handb. d. Mikroskopischen Anatomie, Ed. III, Th. I, 117.Google Scholar
Gunther, M., 1945. “Sore nipples, causes and prevention”, The Lancet, II, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. W., and Turner, J. B., 1931. “A note on the sensory characters of the nipple and areola”, Med. Journ. of Australia, I, 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiffer, M. H., 1940. “L'Histophysiologie du Mamelon Humain”, Bull, de l'Académie Royale de Med. de Belgique, V, 84.Google Scholar
Lawrentjew, B., 1926. “Ueber die Verbreitung der nervösen Elemente in der glatten Muskulature, ihre Endigungsweise in der glatten Muskelzellen”, Zeits.f. Mikroskop. Anat-Forsch., VI, 467.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K., 1911. “An experimental investigation of the mechanism of milk secretion, with special reference to the action of animal extracts”, Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., IV, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maximow, A. A., and Bloom, W., 1944. Textbook of Histology, 4th Edition, Philadelphia and London.Google Scholar
Moir, C., 1933-–1934. “Recording the contraction of the human pregnant and non-pregnant uterus”, Trans. Edin. Obstet. Soc., LIV, 93.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. O., 1936. “Endocrinal control of the mammary gland”, Physiol. Reviews, XVI, 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, M., 1901. Beitr. z. Geb. und Gynaek., v. cit. McKenzie, Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., IV, 305.Google Scholar
Ribbert, H., 1898. “Ueber Transplantation von Ovarium, Hoden u. Mamma”, Arch.f. Entwickelungsmech. d.Org., VII, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, E. A., 1912. Textbook of Microscopic Anatomy (Quain's Anat., II, Part I), London.Google Scholar
Selye, H., Collip, J. B., Thomson, D. L., 1934. “Nervous and hormonal factors in lactation”, Endocrinology, XVIII, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar