Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:55:02.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXII.—The Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of some Tectibranch Molluscs, with a Note on Excretion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Vera Fretter
Vera Fretter
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, University of London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Owing to the comparatively rare occurrence of most tectibranchs it is perhaps not surprising to find that, in spite of the ever-increasing knowledge of the histological structure and functioning of the alimentary canal of molluscs, little attention has been paid in this respect to these forms. The structure of the radula and gizzard has previously aroused interest, but so far as the rest of the alimentary canal is concerned most workers have been content with a somewhat superficial description of the gross morphology such as was given by Vayssière (1880), Bouvier (1893), Pelseneer (1893, 1894), and Guiart (1901). A more recent account of the digestive tract of Philine aperta has been given by Brown (1934), but this includes no histological or physiological consideration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , 1939 , pp. 599 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Amaudeut, A., 1898. “La Partie antérieure du Tube digestif et la Torsion chez les Mollusques gastéropodes,” Ann. Sci. nat., Zool., ser. 8, vol. vii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Bergh, R., 1880. In Semper, C., “Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen,” Malacologische Untersuchungen, vol. iv, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Bergh, R., 1891. “Die cladohepatischen Nudibranchien,” Zool. Jahrb. abt. Syst., vol. v, p. 1.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1930. “The Natural History of Bulla hydatis, Linn.,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. xvii, p. 567.Google Scholar
Bouvier, E.-L., 1893. “Sur l'organisation des Actéons,” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, ser. 9, vol. v, p. 25.Google Scholar
Bregenzer, A., 1916. “Anatomie und Histologie von Bythinella dunkeri,” Zool. Jahrb. abt. Anal., vol. xxxix, p. 237.Google Scholar
Brown, H. H., 1934. “A Study of a Tectibranch Gastropod Mollusc, Philine aperta, (L.),” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lviii, p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, D. R., 1929. “Haliotis,” L.M.B.C. Memoir., Liverpool U.P.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A., and Fleure, H. J., 1903. “Patella,” L.M.B.C. Memoir. London, Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Delaunay, H., 1931. “L'excretion azotée des Invertébrés,” Biol. Rev., vol. vi, p. 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, N. B., 1921. “Aplysia,” L.M.B.C. Memoir. Liverpool U.P.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1937. “On the Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of some Species of Polyplacophora (Mollusca),” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A., 1932. “On the Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of the Limpet,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A., 1938. “The Structure and Function of the Alimentary Canal of Æolid Molluscs, with a Discussion on their Nematocysts,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, p. 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiart, J., 1901. “Contribution a l'Etude des Gastéropodes Opisthobranches et en particulier des Céphalaspides,” Mém. Soc. Zool. France, vol. xiv, p. 1.Google Scholar
Henking, H., 1894. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss von Hydrobia ulvæ Penn. und deren Brutpflege,” Ber. Nalurforsch. Ges. Freiburg i. B., vol. viii, p. 89.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., 1915. “Die Ernährungsbiologie fleischfressender Gastropoden,” Zool. Jahrb. abt. Zool. Physiol., vol. xxxv, p. 357.Google Scholar
Howells, H. H., 1936. “The Anatomy and Histology of the Gut of Cymbulia peronii (Blainville),” Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, vol. xxii, p. 62.Google Scholar
Lacaze-Duthiers, H. De, 1898. “Les ganglions dits Palléaux et le Stomatogastrique de quelques Gastéropodes,” Arch. Zool. exp. gen., ser. 3, vol. vi, p. 331.Google Scholar
Lee, A. B., 1928. The Microtomist's Vade-mecum. London, Churchill.Google Scholar
Lison, L., 1936. Histochimie animale. Paris, Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Millott, N., 1937. “On the Morphology of the Alimentary Canal, Process of Feeding, and Physiology of Digestion of the Nudibranch Mollusc Jorunna tomentosa (Cuvier),” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B, vol. ccxxviii, p. 173.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A., 1925. “The Crystalline Style in Gastropods,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxix, p. 317.Google Scholar
Needham, J., 1935. “Problems of Nitrogen Catabolism in Invertebrates. II. Correlation between Uricotelic Metabolism and Habit in the Phylum Mollusca,” Bio-chem. Journ., vol. xxix, p. 238.Google Scholar
Needham, J., 1938. “Contributions of Chemical Physiology to the Problems of Reversibility in Evolution,” Biol. Rev., vol. xiii, p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J. J., 1890. “On the Anatomy and Histology of Cymbuliopsis calceola,” Stud. Biol. Lab. Johns Hopkins Univ., vol. iv, p. 335.Google Scholar
Peile, A. J., 1937. “Some Radula Problems,” Journ. Conch. London, vol. xx, p. 292.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1893. “Sur le genre Actæon,” Ann. Soc. R. Malacol. Belg., vol. xxviii, p. vii.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1894. “Recherches sur divers Opisthobranches,” Mém. cour. Acad. Roy. Soc. Belg., vol. liii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Prashad, B., 1925. “Anatomy of the common Indian Apple-Snail, Pila globosa,” Mem. Ind. Mus., vol. viii, p. 91.Google Scholar
Pruvot-Fol, A., 1926. “Le bulbe buccal et la symétrie des Mollusques,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., vol. lxv, p. 209.Google Scholar
Robson, G. C., 1921. “On the Anatomy and Affinities of Hypsobia nosophora,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. viii, p. 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, G. C., 1922. “On the anatomy and affinities of Paludestrina ventrosa, Montagu,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxvi, p. 159.Google Scholar
Russell, L., 1929. “The Comparative Morphology of the Elysioid and Æolidioid Types of the Molluscan Nervous System, and its Bearing on the Relationships of the Ascoglossan Nudibranchs,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1878. Bidrag til Kundskaben om Norges Arktiske Fauna. I. Mollusca regionis Arcticm Norvegicæ. Christiania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, A. M. C., and Poole, M., 1910. “The Development of Aplysia punctata,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lv, p. 497.Google Scholar
Spitzer, J. M., 1937. “Physiologische-ökologische Untersuchungen über den Exkretstoffwechsel der Mollusken,” Zool. Jahrb. abt. Zool. Physiol., vol. lvii, p. 457.Google Scholar
Thiele, J., 1925. “Gastropoda Prosobranchia,” in Kükenthal, W., and Keumbach, T.: Handbuch der Zoologie, vol. v. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vayssièrr, M. A., 1880. “Recherches anatomiques sur les Mollusques de la famille des Bullidés,” Ann. Sci. nat. Zool., ser. 6, vol. ix, p. 1.Google Scholar
Wilks, R. A. C., 1938. “A New Decalcification Fluid,” Nature, London, vol. cxlii, p. 958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1923. “Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in the Lamellibranch Mya,” Brit., Journ. exp. Biol., vol. i, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926 a. “The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchia,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. liv, p. 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926 b. “Structure and Physiology of the Organs of Feeding and Digestion in Ostrea edulis,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. xiv, p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926 c. “Ciliary Feeding Mechanisms in the Thecasomatous Pteropods,” Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Zool., vol. xxxvi, p. 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1935. “On some Aspects of Digestion in Ciliary Feeding Animals,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., vol. xxii, p. 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar