Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:53:28.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An enigmatic braincase from Five Points, Ohio (Westphalian D) further supports a stem tetrapod position for aïstopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2019

Jason D. PARDO ,
Robert HOLMES  and
Jason S. ANDERSON
Jason D. PARDO
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Robert HOLMES
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Jason S. ANDERSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. Email: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe a new specimen of the aïstopod Oestocephalus from Five Points, Ohio, which preserves much of the posterior braincase. The specimen, the largest aïstopod skull described, preserves the postorbital region to the occiput. The posterior braincase has coossified the basioccipital, exoccipitals, and opisthotic. The parasphenoid is rostrally restricted, toothless, and highly vaulted along the cultriform process. The lateral walls of the cultriform process are further reinforced by large longitudinally running, ventral flanges from the parietals. Two large endochondral ventral projections from the basioccipital, previously interpreted as basal tuberosities for hypaxial muscle insertion, are here instead interpreted as articulations for the branchial skeleton. This interpretation is further supported by traces of vasculature that is consistent with what is seen in gill-bearing species. A model for the reorganisation of the basicranial region on the transition from hyomandibula to stapes is proposed, which suggests that gills, or gill-support skeletal elements, might be further distributed along the tetrapod stem than previously thought. These data further support the placement of aïstopods in the tetrapod stem group and require a reconsideration of our understanding of early tetrapod evolution.

Keywords

branchial skeletonfenestra vestibularisgillshyomandibulaLepospondylistapes
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 109 , Issue 1-2: Fossils, Function and Phylogeny: Papers on Early Vertebrate Evolution in Honour of Professor Jennifer A. Clack , March 2018 , pp. 255 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6. References

Anderson, J. S. 2001. The phylogenetic trunk: maximal inclusion of taxa with missing data in an analysis of the Lepospondyli. Systematic Biology 50, 170–193.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2002. Revision of the aïstopod genus Phlegethontia (tetrapoda: Lepospondyli). Journal of Paleontology 76, 1029–1046.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2003a. A new aistopod (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli) from Mazon Creek, Illinois. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23, 79–88.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2003b. Cranial anatomy of Coloraderpeton brilli, postcranial anatomy of Oestocephalus amphiuminus, and reconsideration of Ophiderpetontidae (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli: Aistopoda). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23, 532–543.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2007a. Incorporating ontogeny into the matrix: a phylogenetic evaluation of developmental evidence for the origins of modern amphibians. In Anderson, J. S. & Sues, H.-D. (eds) Major transitions in vertebrate evolution, 182–227. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2007b. Direct evidence of the rostral anatomy of the aïstopod Phlegethontia, with a new cranial reconstruction. Journal of Paleontology 81, 408–410.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S., Carroll, R. L. & Rowe, T. 2003. New information on Lethiscus stocki (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli: Aistopoda) from high-resolution computed tomography and a phylogenetic analysis of Aistopoda. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 40, 1071–1083.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S., Reisz, R. R., Scott, D., Froebisch, N. & Sumida, S. S. 2008. A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders. Nature 453, 515–518.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S., Smithson, T., Mansky, C. F., Meyer, T. & Clack, J. 2015. A diverse tetrapod fauna at the base of ‘Romer's Gap'. PLoS ONE 10, e0125446.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 1955. Latex micro-molding and latex-plaster molding mixture. Science 122, 202.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 1964. The aïstopod amphibians surveyed. Brevoria: Museum of Comparative Zoology 206, 1–17.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 1965. Paleozoic lepospondyl amphibians. American Zoologist 5, 287–294.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., Shabica, C. W., Anderson, J. L. & Richardson, E. S. 1985. Biota of a Pennsylvanian muddy coast: habitats within the Mazonian Delta Complex, Northeast Illinois. Journal of Paleontology 59, 253–281.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. J. 1982. Morphology and relationships of the Upper Carboniferous aïstopod amphibian Ophiderpeton nanum. Palaeontology 25, 209–214.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1998a. Order Aïstopoda. Lepospondyli. In Wellnhofer, P. (ed.) Handbook of paleoherpetology vol. 1: Lepospondyli, 163–182. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1998b. Cranial anatomy of ophiderpetontid aïstopods: Paleozoic limbless amphibians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 122, 143–165.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 2000. Lepospondyls. In Heatwole, H. & Carroll, R. L. (eds) Amphibian biology vol. 4: palaeontology: the evolutionary history of amphibians, 1198–1269. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1987. Pholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley, an Amphibian from the Yorkshire Coal Measures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 318, 1–107.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1998. The neurocranium of Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik and the evolution of the otic region in tetrapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 122, 61–97.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 2011. A Carboniferous embolomere tail with supraneural radials. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31, 1150–1153.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. & Anderson, J. S. 2016. Early tetrapods. In Clack, J. A., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N. (eds) Evolution of the vertebrate ear: evidence from the fossil record, 71–105. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. & Holmes, R. 1988. The braincase of the anthracosaur Archeria crassidisca with comments on the interrelationships of primitive tetrapods. Palaeontology 31, 85–107.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. 1991. Fish-like gills and breathing in the earliest known tetrapod. Nature 352, 234–236.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1868. Synopsis of the extinct Batrachia of North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 20, 208–221.Google Scholar
Downs, J. P., Daeschler, E. B., Jenkins, F. A. & Shubin, N. H. 2008. The cranial endoskeleton of Tiktaalik roseae. Nature 455, 925.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1875. Über die Fauna der Gaskohle des Pilsner und Rakonitzer Beckens, 70–79. Prague: Sitzungsberichte der Böhenuschen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Gallup, M. R. 1983. Osteology, functional morphology, and palaeoecology of Coloraderpeton brilli Vaughn, a Pennsylvanian aïstopod amphibian from Colorado. PhD Thesis, University of California, USA.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Heaton, M. J. 1979. Cranial anatomy of primitive captorhinid reptiles from the late Pennsylvanian and Early Permian Oklahoma and Texas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 127, 1–84.Google Scholar
Hook, R. W. & Baird, D. 1986. The Diamond Coal Mine of Linton, Ohio, and its Pennsylvanian-age vertebrates. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 6, 174–190.Google Scholar
Hook, R. W. & Baird, D. 1988. An overview of the Upper Carboniferous fossil deposit at Linton, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 88, 55–60.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. & Wright, E. P. 1867. On a collection of fossil vertebrates, from the Jarrow Colliery, County of Kilkenny, Ireland. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 24, 351–369.Google Scholar
Lebedev, O. A. & Coates, M. I. 1995. The postcranial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Tulerpeton curtum Lebedev. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 114, 307–348.Google Scholar
Lund, R. 1978. Anatomy and relationships of the family Phlegethontiidae (Amphibia, Aïstopoda). Annals of the Carnegie Museum 47, 53–79.Google Scholar
Maddin, H. C., Reisz, R. R. & Anderson, J. S. 2010. Evolutionary development of the neurocranium in Dissorophoidea (Tetrapoda: Temnospondyli), an integrative approach. Evolution & Development 12, 393–403.Google Scholar
McGinnis, H. J. 1967. The osteology of Phlegethontia, a Carboniferous and Permian aïstopod amphibian. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 71, 1–46.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. 1875. Report of the committee consisting of Professor Huxley, LL.D., F.R.S., Professor Harkness, F.R.S., Henry Woodward, F.R.S., James Thompson, John Brigg, and L. C. Miall, on the structure and classification of the labyrinthodonts. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 1874, 149–192.Google Scholar
Milner, A. C. 1993. The aïstopod amphibian from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 84, 363–368.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1980. The tetrapod assemblage from Nyrany, Czechoslovakia. In Panchen, A. L. (ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 234–236. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1972. The skull and skeleton of Eogyrinus attheyi Watson (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 263, 279–326.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. D., Szostakiwskyj, M., Ahlberg, P. E. & Anderson, J. S. 2017. Hidden morphological diversity among early tetrapods. Nature 546, 642–645.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1945. Vertebrate paleontology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1963. The larger embolomerous amphibians of the American Carboniferous. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 128, 415–454.Google Scholar
Ruta, M., Coates, M. I. & Quicke, D. 2003. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biological Reviews 78, 251–345.Google Scholar
Ruta, M. & Coates, M. I. 2007. Dates, nodes and character conflict: addressing the lissamphibian origin problem. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5, 69–122.Google Scholar
Steen, M. C. 1930. The British Museum collection of amphibia from the Middle Coal Measures of Linton, Ohio. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 4, 849–891.Google Scholar
Steen, M. C. 1938. On the fossil Amphibia from the Gas Coal of Nyrany and other deposits in Czechoslovakia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 108, 205–283.Google Scholar
Vallin, G. & Laurin, M. 2004. Cranial morphology and affinities of Microbrachis, and a reappraisal of the phylogeny and lifestyle of the first amphibians. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24, 56–72.Google Scholar
Vaughn, P. P. 1969. Upper Pennsylvanian vertebrates from the Sangre de Cristo Formation of Central Colorado. Los Angeles County Museum Contributions in Science 164, 1–28.Google Scholar
Wellstead, C. F. 1982. A Lower Carboniferous aïstopod amphibian from Scotland. Palaeontology 25, 193–208.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1939. Osteology of Seymouria baylorensis Broili. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 85, 325–409.Google Scholar