Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:46:59.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Literature as Aberrant Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

John K. Noyes
John K. Noyes*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To be a teacher of literature at a university today is to occupy a problematic position in the production and codification of knowledge - a fact that has generated a great deal of critical comment in recent years. But it should be noted that this position in its problematic dimensions is not necessarily new. In fact there is reason to believe that the teacher of literature has always been a propagator of an aberrant science - yet a science that in its aberrations has more to do with the methodological problems of the natural sciences than is usually credited.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 50 , Issue 2: Languages and Literature in a Global Perspective , May 2003 , pp. 55 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2003

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1966) Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich (1953) Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Trask, Willard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Stuart, ed. (1998) Hegel after Derrida. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byatt, A. S. (2001) The Biographer's Tale. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. (2000) Disgrace. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. (1983) Hegel's Development: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801-1806). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1802) Natural Law: The Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, Its Place in Moral Philosophy, and Its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Law. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (1975).Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried (1935) ‘Journal meiner Reise im Sommer 1769’, in Mensch und Geschichte. Sein Werk im Grundriß. Leipzig: Kröner.Google Scholar
Marais, Eugene (1971) The Soul of the White Ant, trans. de Kok, Winifred. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1784) Kabale und Liebe. Stuttgart: Reclam (1986).Google Scholar
Varadharajan, Asha (1997) ‘Dissolution, Dissensus, and the Possibility of Community’, University of Toronto Quarterly 66(4): 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar