No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Contemporary and future directions of analytic philosophy: Commentary on Jaakko Hintikka, “Philosophical Research: Problems and Prospects”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Diogenes , Volume 61 , Issue 2: Trends and Debates in Contemporary Epistemology , May 2014 , pp. 33 - 41
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2016
References
Borges, JL (1998) “Broadie's Report” [1970]. In: Collected Fictions, trans Hurley, A. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J, Sandu, G (2007) What is logic? In: Jacquette, D (ed) Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D (2000) Liar paradox and metaparadox. Sats: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Filosofi 1: 93–104.10.1515/SATS.2000.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D, ed (2007a) Introduction. In: Jacquette, Philosophy of Logic. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
Jacquette, D (2007b) Denying the liar. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1(2): 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D (2008) Denying the liar reaffirmed, Polish Journal of Philosophy 2(1): 143–157.10.5840/pjphil20082110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, D (2010) Liar paradox and substitution into intensional contexts. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4(1): 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1965) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N Kemp . New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1975) Philosophical Remarks, ed Rhees, R and trans Hargreaves, , White, R. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar