Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:07:00.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Campbell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Andrew Botterell
Andrew Botterell
Affiliation:
Sonoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions/Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 155 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, Ned 1981 “Psychologism and Behaviorism.” The Philosophical Review, 90: 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Neil 2000 “Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Association, 39: 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985 “Replies to Essays X-XII.” In Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events. Edited by Vermazen, B. and Hintikka, M. B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–52.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1993 “Concepts of Supervenience.” In Supervenience and Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1983 “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” In Properties. Edited by Mellor, D. H. and Oliver, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 188–227.Google ScholarPubMed