Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:30:54.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Law as a Fact of Reason and Correctness Conditions for the Moral Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

BYEONG D. LEE
BYEONG D. LEE*
Affiliation:
Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the second Critique, Kant claims that the moral law is given as a fact of reason. In this paper, contra the standard view, I argue that there is a non-dogmatic way of defending this claim. And Kant’s principle of morality is widely taken to be a formal principle. How then can such a formal principle be reconciled with our substantial moral end? In this paper, I also argue that Kant’s principle of morality can be construed as a formal principle in the sense that it provides correctness conditions for moral laws, rather than providing specific moral laws.

Dans sa deuxième Critique, Kant affirme que la loi morale se donne comme un fait de raison. Dans cet article, contrairement à la position standard, nous prétendons qu’il existe une autre façon — non dogmatique — de défendre cette affirmation. Par ailleurs, le principe de moralité de Kant est largement considéré comme étant formel. Comment un tel principe formel peut-il être réconcilié avec notre fin morale substantielle? Nous soutenons également que le principe de moralité de Kant peut être interprété comme un principe formel dans le sens où il fournit des conditions d’acceptabilité pour les lois morales, et non des lois morales spécifiques.

Keywords

Kantian ethicsmoral lawfact of reasoncorrectness conditions for moral lawscoherentist defence
Type
Original Article/Article original
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 47 - 66
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, Karl 2000 Kant’s Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2013 “Is Practical Justification in Kant Ultimately Dogmatic?” In Kant on Practical Justification, eds. Timmons, Mark and Baiasu, Sorin, 153–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White 1960 A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994 Making It Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2006 Kant. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2007 “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Inquiry 50 (5): 444–464.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 1993 The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1968 Leviathan. Reprinted from the edition of 1651, ed. Macpherson, C.B.. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1991 “Theory and Practice.” In Kant’s Political Writings, Second Edition, trans. Nisbet, H.B., and ed. Reiss, Hans, 73–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1996a “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary, 37–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1996b “Critique of Practical Reason.” In Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary, 133–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1996c “The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary, 353–452. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1998 Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996a Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996b The Source of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008 The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae 2007 “Objective and Unconditioned Value.” Philosophical Review 116 (2): 157–185.Google Scholar
Lee, Byeong D. 2008 “A Pragmatic Phenomenalist Account of Knowledge.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 47 (3–4): 565–582.Google Scholar
Lee, Byeong D. 2014 “Epistemic Principles and Epistemic Circularity.” Philosophia 42 (2): 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian 2003 “Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of Deduction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2): 209–229.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1961 “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In his From a Logical Point of View, Second Edition, 20–46. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1980 “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (9): 515–572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1989 “Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Förster, Eckhart, 81–113. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2000 Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2006 Agency & Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2010 “Formal Principles and the Form of a Law.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1983 “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics, Meta-Mathematics, Second Edition, trans. Woodger, J.H., and ed. Corcoran, John, 152–278. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2010 “Reversal or Retreat? Kant’s Deductions of Freedom and Morality.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, 73–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Owen 2017 “Kant’s Deductions of Morality and Freedom.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (1): 116–147.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen 1999 Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen 2008 Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar