Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:13:50.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christian Difference. A Review Essay

Review products

The Slain God: Anthropologists and the Christian Faith, by TimothyLarsen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).

Transforming Masculinities in African Christianity: Gender Controversies in Times of AIDS, by Adriaan S.Van Klinken (London: Routledge, 2016 [originally published by Ashgate in 2013]).

Christianity, Conflict, and Renewal in Australia and the Pacific, edited by FionaMagowan and CarolynSchwarz (Leiden: Brill, 2016).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2017

Matt Tomlinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University

Extract

The discipline called the “anthropology of Christianity” began to gain traction in the early to mid-2000s when interested scholars focused on Christianity as an object of collaborative and comparative cross-cultural analysis. Along with several landmark works of Joel Robbins, one foundational text is Fenella Cannell's edited volume The Anthropology of Christianity, published in 2006. In her introductory essay, Cannell poses a pointed question for the volume and the discipline itself: “What difference does Christianity make?” Bracketing the question of whether “difference” can or should be defined (Green 2014), several anthropologists have taken inspiration from Cannell, including Naomi Haynes (2014) in the concluding essay to a recent special issue of Current Anthropology, and myself and Debra McDougall (2013) in an edited volume on Christian politics in Oceania. Difference, as the criterion by which continuity and transformation are evaluated, is arguably the key concept for an effective anthropological engagement with Christianity.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bialecki, Jon. In press. Anthropology, Theology, and the Challenge of Immanence. In Lemons, J. D., ed., Theologically Engaged Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fountain, Philip and Lau, Sin Wen, eds. 2013. Anthropological Theologies: Engagements and Encounters. Special issue, Australian Journal of Anthropology 24, 3.Google Scholar
Green, Sarah. 2014. Anthropological Knots: Conditions of Possibilities and Interventions. Hau 4, 3: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handman, Courtney. 2015. Critical Christianity: Translation and Denominational Conflict in Papua New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, Naomi. 2014. Affordances and Audiences: Finding the Difference Christianity Makes. Current Anthropology 55, S10: S35765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J. Derrick, ed. In press. Theologically Engaged Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meneses, Eloise, Backues, Lindy, Bronkema, David, Flett, Eric, and Hartley, Benjamin L., eds. 2014. Engaging the Religiously Committed Other: Anthropologists and Theologians in Dialogue. CA Forum. Current Anthropology 55, 1.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2006. Anthropology and Theology: An Awkward Relationship? Anthropological Quarterly 79, 2: 285–94.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2013. Beyond the Suffering Subject: Toward an Anthropology of the Good. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, 3: 447–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel, Schieffelin, Bambi B., and Vilaça, Aparecida. 2014. Evangelical Conversion and the Transformation of the Self in Amazonia and Melanesia: Christianity and the Revival of Anthropological Comparison. Comparative Studies in Society and History 56, 3: 559–90.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Matt and McDougall, Debra, eds. 2013. Christian Politics in Oceania. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar