Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:58:17.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Social Structures and Foster Relations in the Hindu Kush: Milk Kinship Allegiance in Former Mountain Kingdoms of Northern Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2001

Peter Parkes
Affiliation:
University of Kent

Abstract

This article is a comparative elaboration of Eugene Hammel's pioneering analysis of “fictive kinship,” Alternative Social Structures and Ritual Relations in the Balkans (1968). In place of godparenthood, I examine the structurally similar institution of fosterage or “milk kinship” as documented in former mountain kingdoms of the Hindu Kush in northern Pakistan. Comparable structures of interdomestic allegiance and tributary patronage organized through milk kinship are attested more fragmentarily elsewhere in the Middle East and Central Asia, and there is further evidence that such hierarchized foster relations also extended into many peripheral regions of premodern Europe (E. Goody 1982:280–1; Parkes n.d.). Hammel himself mentioned Serbian “kinship by milk” (srodstvo po mleku)—“meaning the fictive kinship relationship between two children suckled by the same woman, but otherwise unrelated” (1968:31 n.27)—with reference to Filopovich's (1963) earlier survey of South Slavonic ritual kinship. Yet Hammel did not pursue the possible analogies of such fosterage ties with kumstvo godparenthood: as structurally equivalent institutions of constructed kinship, once orchestrating transitive chains of interdomestic allegiance and tributary governance in peripheral polities throughout Eurasia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Society for Comparative Study of Society and History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This essay is indebted to the prior ethnography of German colleagues in the Hindu Kush, especially of Karl Jettmar, my professorial sponsor as an Alexander von Humboldt research fellow at Heidelberg University from 1984 to 1986, who very generously afforded access to the unpublished Ms. of Hussam-ul-Mulk (n.d.), including his own acute commentary on Chitrali milk kinship. I am also grateful to Jeremy MacClancy, who instigated this article by suggesting a collaborative work on global fosterage, and to helpful comments from Rodney Needham. Comparison of milk kinship with godparenthood was originally inspired by John Davis (1977:236–8), further benefiting from Jane Khatib-Chahidi's (1992) comparative considerations of Eurasian fosterage, while the potential comparability of Arabic and Balkan milk kinship was presciently noted by Soraya Altorki (1980:244 n. 14).