Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:19:56.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strong Convergence and Speed up of Nested Stochastic Simulation Algorithm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Can Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Di Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the Nested Stochastic Simulation Algorithm (NSSA) for stochastic chemical reacting networks by first proving its strong convergence. We then study a speed up of the algorithm by using the explicit Tau-Leaping method as the Inner solver to approximate invariant measures of fast processes, for which strong error estimates can also be obtained. Numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the validity of our analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Anderson, D.F., Ganguly, A. and Kurtz, T.G., Error analysis of tau-leap simulation methods, Annal. Appl. Prob., 21 (2011), 22262262.Google Scholar
[2]Agarwal, R.P., Difference equations and inequalities, Theory, Methods, and Applications, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992.Google Scholar
[3]Albeverio, S., Brzezniak, Z., and Wu, J.-L., Existence of global solutions and invariant measures for stochastic differential equations driven by Poisson type noise with non-Lipschitz coefficients, J. Math. Phys. Appl., 371 (2010), 309322.Google Scholar
[4]Applebaum, D., Lévy processes and stochastic calculus”, Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
[6]Cao, Y., Gillespie, D. and Petzold, L., The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm, J. Chem. Phys., 122(1) (2005), 014116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7]W. E, , Liu, D., and Vanden-Eijnden, E., Nested stochastic simulation algorithm for chemical kinetic systems with disparate rates, J. Chem. Phys., 123 (2005), 194107.Google Scholar
[8]W. E, , Liu, D., and Vanden-Eijnden, E., Nested stochastic simulation algorithm for chemical kinetic systems with multiple time scales, J. Comp. Phys., 221 (2007), 158180.Google Scholar
[9] W. E, Liu, D., and Vanden-Eijnden, E., Analysis of multiscale methods for stochastic differential equations, Comm. Pure. Appl. Math., 58 (2005), 15441585.Google Scholar
[10]El-Samad, H., Khammash, M., Kurata, H., and Doyle, J.C., Feedback regulation of the heat shock response in E. coli, Multidiciplinary Research in Control, LNCIS 289 (2003), 115128.Google Scholar
[11]El-Samad, H., Kurata, H., Doyle, J.C., Gross, C.A., and Khammash, M., Surviving heat shock: Control strategies for robustness and performance, PNAS, 102 (2004), 27362741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Gillespie, D.T., A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions, J. Comp. Phys., 22 (1976), 403434.Google Scholar
[13]Gillespie, D.T., Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions, J. Chem. Phys., 81 (1977), 23402361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Gillespie, D.T., Approximate accelerated simulation of chemically reaction systems, J. Chem. Phys., 115 (2001), 17161733.Google Scholar
[15]Hanson, F.B., Applied Stochastic Processes and Control for Jump-Diffusions, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007.Google Scholar
[16]Haseltine, E.L. and Rawlings, J.B., Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic kinetics, J. Chem. Phys., 117 (2002), 69596969.Google Scholar
[17]Huang, C., Wu, M., Liu, D. and Chan, C., Systematic modeling for insulin signaling network mediated by IRS1 and IRS2, to appear.Google Scholar
[18]Khasminskii, R., Stochastic Stability of Differential Equations, Netherlands, Sijthoff & No-ordhoff, 1980.Google Scholar
[19]Kitano, Y. and Kameyama, T., Molecular structure of RNA polymerase and its complex with DNA, J. Biochem., 65 (1969), 116.Google Scholar
[20]Kubota, N., Kubota, T., Itoh, S., Kumagai, H., Kozono, H., Takamoto, I., Mineyama, T., Ogata, H., Tokuyama, K., Ohsugi, M., Sasako, T., Moroi, M., Sugi, K., Kakuta, S., Iwakura, Y., Noda, T., Ohnishi, S., and Nagai, R., Dynamic functional relay between insulin receptor substrate 1 and 2 in hepatic insulin signaling during fasting and feeding, Cell Mepsilonb., 8 (2008), 4964.Google Scholar
[21]Kurata, H., El-Samad, H., Yi, T.M., Khammash, M., and Doyle, J.C., Feedback regulation of the heat shock resonse in E. coli, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, 2001.Google Scholar
[22]Kurata, H., El-Samad, H., Iwasaki, R., Ohtake, H., Doyle, J.C., Grigorova, I., Gross, C.A. and Khammash, M., Module-based analysis of robustness tradeoffs in the heat shock response system, PLOS Computational Biology, 2 (2006), 663675.Google Scholar
[23]Li, T., Analysis of explicit tau-leaping schemes for simulating chemically reacting systems, Multiscale Model. Simul., 6 (2007), 417436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Liu, D., Analysis of multiscale methods for stochastic dynamical systems with multiple time scales, SIAM Multiscale Model. Simul., 8 (2010), 944964.Google Scholar
[25]Mattingly, J.C., Stuart, A.M. and tretyakov, M.V., Convergence of numerical time-averaging and stationary measures via Poisson equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 48 (2010), 552577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Mattingly, J.C., Stuart, A.M., and Higham, D.J., Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: Locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise, Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 101 (2002), 185232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Meyn, S.P. and Tweedie, R.L., Stability of Markovian processes III. Foster-Lyapunov criteria for continuous-time processes, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 25 (1993), 518548.Google Scholar
[28]Miller, K.S., An Introduction to the Calculus of Finite Differences and Difference Equations, Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
[29]Milstein, G.N. and Tretyakov, M.V., Computing ergodic limits for Langevin equations, Phys-ica D, 229 (2007), 8195.Google Scholar
[30]Milstein, G.N. and Tretyakov, M.V., Numerical integration of stochastic differential equations with non-globally Lipschitz coefficients, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43 (2005), 11391154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Oksendal, B. and Sulem, A., Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions, Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
[32]Panloup, F., Recursive computation of the invariant measure of a stochastic differential equation driven by a Lévy process, Annal. Appl. Prob., 18 (2008), 379426.Google Scholar
[33]Pitas, R., InnerarIity, T., Arnold, K., and Mahley, R., Rate and equilibrium constants for binding of apo-EHDLC (a cholesterol-induced lipoprotein) and low density lipoproteins to human fibroblasts: Evidence for multiple receptor binding of apo-EHDLC, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (Cell Biology), 76 (1979), 23112315.Google Scholar
[34]Prato, G. Da and Zabczyk, J., Ergodicity for Infinite Dimensional Systems, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
[35]Shea, M.A. and Ackersf, G. K., The OR control system of bacteriophage Lambda A physical-chemical model for gene regulation, J. Mol. Biol., 181 (1985), 211230.Google Scholar
[36]Talay, D., Second-order discretization schemes of stochastic differential systems for the computation of the invariant law, Stoch. Stoch. Reports, 29 (1990), 1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Todorovic, P., An Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
[38]Wang, Q. and Kaguni, J. M., A novel sigma factor is involved in expression of the rpoH gene of Escherichia coli, J. Bacteriol., 171 (1989), 42484253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[40]Yang, X., Nath, A., Opperman, M.J., and Chan, C., The double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase differentially regulates insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 in HepG2 cells, Mol. Biol. Cell, 21 (2010), 34493458.Google Scholar