Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T05:08:18.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Disease Modification in Alzheimer's Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Jeffrey L. Cummings*
Affiliation:
Dr. Cummings is director of the Alzheimer's Disease Center at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the, University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

We appear to be on the brink of a new epoch of treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compelling evidence suggests that Aβ42 secretion is the triggering event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, and that tau aggregation may be an important secondary event linked to neurodegeneration. Prophylactic administration of anti-amyloid agents designed to prevent Aβ accumulation in persons with subclinical disease is likely to be more effective than therapeutic interventions in established Alzheimer's disease. Drug development programs in Alzheimer's disease focus primarily on agents with anti-amyloid disease-modifying properties, and many different pharmacologic approaches to reducing amyloid pathology and tauopathy are being studied. Classes of therapeutic modalities currently in advanced-stage clinical trial testing include forms of immunotherapy (active β -amyloid immunoconjugate and human intravenous immunoglobulin), a γ-secretase inhibitor, the selective Aβ42-lowering agent R-flurbiprofen, and the anti-aggregation agent tramiprosate. Non-traditional dementia therapies such as the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), valproate, and lithium are now being assessed for clinical benefit as anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments. Positive findings of efficacy and safety from clinical studies are necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate that a drug has disease-modifying properties. Definitive proof of disease-modification requires evidence from validated animal models of Alzheimer's disease; rigorously controlled clinical trials showing a significantly improved, stabilized, or slowed rate of decline in cognitive and global function compared to placebo; and prospectively obtained evidence from surrogate biomarkers that the treatment resulted in measurable biological changes associated with the underlying disease process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cummings, JL. Challenges to demonstrating disease-modifying effects in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2006. In press.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Cummings, JL, Raskind, MA, Lin, P, Galasko, D. Clinical trial outcome measures to evaluate potential disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer's disease: Application in clinical practice. CNS News. 2006;May:111.Google Scholar
3.McLendon, BM, Doraiswamy, PM. Defining meaningful change in Alzheimer's disease trials: the donepezil experienceJ Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999;12:3948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Rockwood, K. Global assessment measures. In: Rockwood, K, Gauthier, S, eds. Trial Designs and Outcomes in Dementia Therapeutic Research. Oxon, England: Taylor & Francis; 2006:7584.Google Scholar
5.Wilcock, GK, Lilienfield, S, Gaens, E, the Galantamine International-1 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000;321:17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Winblad, B, Engedal, K, Soininen, H, et al for the Donepezil Nordic Study Group. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology. 2001;57:489495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Mohs, RC, Doody, RS, Morris, JC, et al.A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology. 2001;57:481488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Petersen, RC, Thomas, RG, Grundman, M, et al for the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:23792388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Sano, M, Ernesto, C, Thomas, RG, et al for the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Group. A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol, or both as treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:12161222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Davis, KL. Current and experimental therapeutics in Alzheimer's disease. In: Davis, KL, Charney, D, Coyle, JT, Nemeroff, CB, eds. Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002:12431252. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/Docs/G5/CHP9_1187-1188.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2006.Google Scholar
11.Feigin, A. Evidence from biomarkers and surrogate endpoint. NeuroRx. 2004;1:323330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Small, GW. Structural and functional brain imaging of Alzheimer's disease. In: Davis, KL, Charney, D, Coyle, JT, Nemeroff, CB, eds. Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002:12321242. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/Docs/G5/CH86_1231-1242.pdf accessed September 13, 2006.Google Scholar
13.Thal, LJ, Kantarci, K, Reiman, EM, et al.The role of biomarkers in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20:615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Jack, CR Jr, Petersen, RC, Xu, YC, et al.Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 1999;52:13971403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Jagust, W, Gitcho, A, Sun, F, Kuczynski, B, Mungas, D, Haan, M. Brain imaging evidence of preclinical Alzheimer's disease in normal aging. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:673681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Klunk, WE, Engler, H, Nordberg, A, et al.Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Fagan, AM, Mintun, MA, Mach, RH, et al.Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta(42) in humans. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:512519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Kepe, V, Barrio, JR, Huang, S-C, et al.Serotonin 1A receptors in the living brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. PNAS. 2006;103:702707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Wiltfang, J, Lewczuk, P, Riederer, P, et al.Consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Biological Markers of Dementia: the role of CSF and blood analysis in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2005;6:6984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Sunderland, T, Linker, G, Mirza, N, et al.Decreased beta-amyloid1-42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 2003;289:20942103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Huey, ED, Mirza, N, Putnam, KT, et al.Stability of CSF beta-amyloid(1-42) and tau levels by APOE genotype in Alzheimer patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22:4853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.van Oijen, M, Hofman, A, Soares, HD, Koudstaal, PJ, Breteler, MM. Plasma Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) and the risk of dementia: a prospective case-cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:655660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Blasko, I, Jellinger, K, Kemmler, G, et al.Conversion from cognitive health to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: Prediction by plasma amyloid beta 42, medial temporal lobe atrophy and homocysteine. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;[epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.002.Google Scholar
24.Duff, K. Transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (chapter 84). In: Davis, KL, Charney, D, Coyle, JT, Nemeroff, CB, eds. Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress. American College of Neuropsychopharmacolog. 2002:12151219. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/Docs/G5/CH84_1215-1220.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2006.Google Scholar
25.Oddo, S, Caccamo, A, Shepherd, JD, et al.Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron. 2003;39:409421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Bales, KR, Dorocke, J, Koger, D, et al.Administration of an anti-Aβ Fab fragment to APPV717F transgenic mice reduces neuritic plaque. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Geerts, H. NC-531 Neurochem. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2004;5:95100.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Golde, TE, Eriksen, J, Nicolle, M, et al.Selective Abeta42 modifying agents: effects on Abeta deposition and behavior in Tg2576 mice. Presented at: the 9th International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. Philadelphia, PA; July 18, 2004.Google Scholar
29.Oddo, S, Billings, L, Kesslak, JP, Cribbs, DH, LaFerla, FM. Aβ immunotherapy leads to clearance of early, but not late, hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates via the proteasome. Neuron. 2004;43:321332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Jacobsen, JS, Reinhart, P, Pangalos, MN. Current concepts in therapeutic strategies targeting cognitive decline and disease modification in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroRx. 2005;2:612626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed