Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:23:15.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Trajection of Words or Hyperbaton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. P. Postgate
J. P. Postgate
Affiliation:
Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , August 1916 , pp. 142 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 142 note 1 Like Professor Conway, in his article ‘On the Interweaving of Words with Pairs of Parallel Phrases,’ The Classical Review, xiv. (1900) pp. 357CrossRefGoogle Scholarsqq., I use italics to show the correspondences of the words in question, not the punctuation marks employed by Madvig Adversaria 2 p. 71 and others after him, with their misleading modern associations. The effect of such marks is not to reunite the separated words but to disjoin the rest.

page 143 note 1 E.g. Professor Housman has several copious ones in his notes on Manilius and elsewhere.

page 143 note 2 E.g. in Kiihncr's, Lateinische Grammatik, ed. Stegmann, , vol. ii., pt. 2, pp. 618sqqGoogle Scholar.

page 143 note 3 Their immediate postposition as in Lucr. 1. 841 ‘ignibus ex’ is a different matter and •does not concern us here.

page 145 note 1 ‘Man darf auch eins nicht vergessen: der römische Dichter konnte auf ein Publikum von Hörern rechnen und ein sinngemässer Vortrag ist oft der beste Kommentar,’ Hildebrandt, R., Beiträge zur Erklärung des Gedichtes Aetna, p. 28.Google Scholar