Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:09:56.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Nonnian Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Giuseppe Giangrande
Giuseppe Giangrande
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1965 , pp. 18 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rouse's rendering (in his Loeb edition of Nonnus) of γλαυκά at ii. 45 as ‘tawny’ is erroneous: γλαυκός could never denote such a colour. Whether at xliii. 265 (γλαυκὰ θαλασσαίης ἐπεμάστιε νῶτα λεαίνης) γλαυκά means ‘gleaming’ (as I think) or ‘greeny’ (as Rouse takes it; because covered with sea-weed?) is best left to zoologists to decide. At vii. 249 γλαυκά clearly means ‘sparkling’, as correctly seen by Rouse (the wording γλαυκὰ … λεύσσω is probably an echo, in Nonnus, of grammarians' etymologies; cf. Thes., s.v. γλαυκός).