Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:01:18.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dr. Wissowa on the Argei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. Warde Fowler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , March 1902 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 115 note 1 The references will be found in fall in Wissowa's article, and the most important in my Roman Festivals, p. III foll.

page 116 note 1 He holds with Diels (Sibyllinische Blätter, p. 42 foll.) that the number 27 should be accepted as having special religious significance at Rome as well as in Greece and elsewhere.

page 116 note 2 The inverted commas are Wissowa's, and speak his well-known contempt for the species.

page 117 note 1 After a fresh reading of his chapters 45–46, I am inclined to think that Varro here uses partes of four districts of the city before they became technically organised as regiones. ‘E quis (partibus) prima est scripta regio Suburana,’ &c, he adds.

page 118 note 1 ‘Sunt enim loca publica urbis, sunt sacella, quae post restitutam tribunieiam potestatem nemo attigit, quae majores in urbe partim periculi perfugia esse voluerunt. Haec lege tribunicia Xviri vendunt.’ I know of no clue to the identification of the sacella here mentioned.

page 118 note 2 This exception he has tried to explain in his work de Feriis, ix. foil. See my Roman Festivals, p. 44.