Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:16:14.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ancient Sculpture and Painting - (a) Brunn-Biruckmann's Denkmäkr Griechischer und Romischer Sculptur, fortgeführt und tnit erläuternden Texten versehenvon Paul Arndt. Plates 501–600. Munich : F. Bruckmann, 1902–1906. - (b) Denkmäler der Malerei des Altertums, herausgegeben von Paul Herrmann. Munich: F. Bruckmann, 1907. Each part M. 20.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. S.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , August 1907 , pp. 145 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 147 note 1 Nor should it be forgotten that in the earlier article Dr. Hauser made a tempting though, as he admits, by no means proven suggestion to the effect that the originals of the reliefs of similar style in Tegel with the three Moirai, and with a Zeus and Hephaistos (from a ‘Nativity of Athena’) may have belonged to the same monument which he further surmises to have been the basis of the Altar of Zeus Soter, at the Peiraieus, noted both by Pliny and by Pausanias.

page 147 note 2 The early date, proposed by Mr. Phillips, Claude (Burlington Magazine, 1904, pp. 111–124)Google Scholar for this bronze must be abandoned, in the light of the arguments adduced by Dr. Bode, (Burlington Magazine, 1904 (March), p. 215)Google Scholar and by Michon, M. Éienne in Monuments Piot xii., 1905, pp. 159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar. M. Michon, however, favours the Louis XIV. period rather than that of Louis XVI. proposed by Dr. Bode.