Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:16:10.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON THE ‘NEW APULEIUS’ (3.20 STOVER, P. 100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

Mikhail Shumilin
Mikhail Shumilin*
Affiliation:
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lines 3.20–2 of the text published by Justin Stover as Apuleius’ De Platone 3 are printed by him as follows:

improbat deinde eos qui negantis homines in seruitute habeant aut qui omnino eiusdem ciuitatis nationem belli iure diruant aut qui hostium spolia deorum aedibus adfigant.

He [sc. Plato] then rebukes those who hold people in slavery against their will, or else who destroy utterly the people of that same city by right of war, or who hang the spoils of enemies on the shrines of the gods. (transl. J. Stover)

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , May 2019 , pp. 456 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stover, J.A., A New Work by Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of the De Platone (Oxford, 2016)Google Scholar.

2 Hays, G., ‘Notes on the “new Apuleius”’, CQ 68 (2018), 246–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 247.

3 I quote from Slings, S.R. (ed.), Platonis Respublica (Oxford, 2003), 203Google Scholar; γοῦν ἂν is Slings's conjecture instead of γ’ ἂν οὖν and γὰρ οὖν found in the manuscripts.

4 See the apparatus criticus in Stover (n. 1), 100.

5 For other instances of incorrect word-division in this text, see Stover (n. 1), 57, Shumilin, M., ‘A conjecture on the “new Apuleius”’, CQ 68 (2018), 351–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.