Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:49:31.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Errant Fragment of Theophrastus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

H. B. Gottschalk
H. B. Gottschalk
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are a number of fragments attributed to Theophrastus, as well as titles in Diogenes Laertius' catalogue of his writings (5.42ff.), of which it is uncertain whether they should be placed among his logical or rhetorical works. In this note I want to give my reasons for excluding one of them from my forthcoming edition of his logical fragments. It is not my intention here to discuss all the questions it raises; I hope to come back to them in a later volume of my commentary.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , December 1992 , pp. 529 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Modern Authors Cited

Ackrill, J. L. (translator), Aristotle's Categories and De interpretatione (Oxford, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochenski, I. M., La logique de Théophraste (Fribourg en Suisse, 1947).Google Scholar
Bochenski, I. M.. Formale Logik (Freiburg/München, 1956; there are many later editions and translations, including one into English; references are to paragraphs).Google Scholar
Brandis, C. A. (ed.), Scholia in Aristotelem (Berlin, 1836).Google Scholar
Brandis, C. A.. ‘Über die Reihenfolge der Bücher des Aristotelischen Organons und ihre Griechischen Ausleger’; Abh. Akad. Berlin, 1833, 249–99.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (ed.), Ammonius In Aristotelis De interpretatione commentarius (Berlin, 1897). (Comm. in Ar. Graeca vol. 4 pt. 5; includes extracts from related commentaries in the introduction, pp. xv ff.).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus, fr. 65 Wimmer: Is it Important for Understanding Peripatetic Rhetoric?’, AJP 111 (1990), 168–75.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. et al. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence (Leiden, 1992).Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B., ‘Prolegomena to an Edition of Theophrastus' Fragments’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles, Werk und Wirkung (Berlin, 1985), pp. 543–56.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (ed.), Die logischen Fragmente des Theophrast (Berlin, 1973). (Kleine Texte 191.)Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A., ‘Theophrastus as a Literary Critic’, TAPA 83 (1952), 172–83.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A.. The Greek and Roman Critics (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L., ‘The Origin and Meaning of the Ancient Characters of Style’, AJP 26 (1905), 249–90.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C., ‘Theophrastus and the Theory of Style’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.), Theophrastus of Eresus: On his Life and Work (New Brunswick and Oxford, 1985), pp. 251–67.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. (ed.), Theophrasti Περ⋯ λ⋯ξεως libri fragmenta (Lipsiae, 1910).Google Scholar
Pépin, J., ‘Σ⋯μβολα, Σημεια, Ὁμοιώματα. A propos de De interpretatione 1, 16a3–8 et Politique 8.5, 1340a6–39’ in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, i (Berlin, 1985), pp. 22–44.Google Scholar
Prantl, C., Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, i (Leipzig, 1855).Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O., ‘Theophrastos von Eresos’, RE Suppl. 7, 1353–1562.Google Scholar
Repici, L. (ed.), La logica di Teofrasto (Bologna, 1977).Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., De Theophrasto Rhetore (Halle, 1839).Google Scholar
Solmsen, F., ‘Aristotle and Cicero on the Orator's Playing on the Feelings’, CP 33 (1938), 390–404 =Google Scholar
Kleine Schriften, ii (Hildesheim, 1968), pp. 216–30.Google Scholar
Stroux, J., De Theophrasti virtutibus dicendi (Lipsiae, 1912).Google Scholar
Wimmer, F. (ed.), Theophrasti Eresii Opera, iii (Lipsiae, 1862).Google Scholar