Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:41:17.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AFTER THE THREE-BAR SIGMA CONTROVERSY: THE HISTORY OF ATHENIAN IMPERIALISM REASSESSED*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

P.J. RHODES
P.J. RHODES
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , December 2008 , pp. 501 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This is a slightly revised version of the paper which I read to the Thirteenth International Congress of Greek and Latin Epigraphy in Oxford, in September 2007. I thank Dr. S.D. Lambert for inviting me to contribute to the panel which he was organizing, and all who have discussed this subject with me, there and elsewhere. In particular, I thank Dr. N. Papazarkadas for showing me two recent papers of his, one of which he is contributing to J. Ma et al. (edd.), Interpreting the Athenian Empire. New Essays (Duckworth, forthcoming), in which he performs the kind of exercise I am performing here – and for saving me from an error of mine: he accepts lower dates more consistently than I do; for the decree for Sigeum he proposes an even lower date (IG I3 17: see p. 504 with n. 8, below); but he stresses that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and thinks that Pericles' imperialism differed from Cleon's in practices of publication rather than practices of rule.