Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T10:00:58.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charting the State of Social Cohesion in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2006

Joseph Chan  and
Elaine Chan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports findings from the first social cohesion survey in Hong Kong. Social cohesion is understood as a multi-dimensional concept, having a horizontal dimension which is concerned with both feelings and actions of members of society, and a vertical dimension that taps those between society and the government. It is found that horizontally, society feels cohesive but the feeling is not supported by corresponding behaviour such as participation in organizations and engagement in giving and helping. Vertically, society has much higher trust in bureaucracies of justice administration than the executive branch of the government. The level of civic engagement is respectable despite a general dissatisfaction with government performance. We conclude that however cohesively society feels, it is achieved with little institutional mediation and social engagement. We postulate that this is possible because lending support to advocacy groups, participation in small group activities and close family ties might have rendered institutional mediation less significant.

Type
Articles
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 187 , September 2006 , pp. 635 - 658
Copyright
© The China Quarterly, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was presented at the Conference on Social Cohesion, organized by the Faculty of Social Sciences, the University of Hong Kong and The Hong Kong Council of Social Service, 28–29 November 2003. The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Social Sciences, the University of Hong Kong for funding the questionnaire survey upon which this article is based.