Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:12:26.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Parents Say About their Experience of Family Preservation Programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2014

Maureen Long  and
Margarita Frederico
Maureen Long*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University, 3086 Victoria, Australia
Margarita Frederico
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University, 3086 Victoria, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Dr Maureen Long, Department of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University, 3086 Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines the findings of a study which asked parents how they experienced participating in family preservation programs (FP) in Melbourne, Australia. The study explored whether participation was influential in changing their perceptions of themselves as parents. It was expected that participation would lead to a stronger sense of self-worth and that this could be harnessed to facilitate change. The study found that parents’ sense of self as a parent was enhanced by participation in FP programs and this led to an increased sense of hopefulness in their capacity to care safely for their children.

Keywords

family preservationconsumer experiencehopefulness
Type
Special Section: Moving beyond protection: Inclusiveness and families
Information
Children Australia , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 74 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, C. (1992). Living and relating: An introduction to phenomenology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (2000). Evidence-based social work practice with families. A lifespan approach. New York: Springer Series on Social Work.Google Scholar
Cortis, N. (2004). Evaluating ‘performance’ in family welfare services: Service users’ perspectives. Proceedings of the Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference, 13–15 October, Adelaide, South Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aes.asn.au/conferences/2004/FR4%20Cortis,%20N.pdfGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (2003). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Drisko, J. (1998). Utilization-focussed evaluation of two intensive family preservation programs. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79 (1), 62–74.Google Scholar
Duerr Berrick, J. (2008). Take me home: Protecting America's vulnerable children and families. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. (2008). Euphoria will fade, but hope springs eternal. The Independent, 9 November. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/a-c-grayling-euphoria-will-fade-but-hope-springs-eternal-1003448.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kapp, S., & Vela, R. (2004). The unheard client: Assessing the satisfaction of parents of children in foster care. Child and Family Social Work, 9, 197–206.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. (1995). For children's sake: The promise of family preservation. Proceedings of the Second National Family Preservation Conference, 14–17 February, Canterbury Family Centre, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Kinney, J., Madsen, B., Fleming, T., & Haapala, D. (1977). Homebuilders: Keeping families together. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45 (4), 667–673.Google Scholar
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, G. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meagher, J. (2002). Guest Editorial: Beyond partnership: Hypocrisy and challenges in the mental health consumer movement. The Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://auseinetflinders.edu.aUljournalivollisslimeagher.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mruk, C. (2006). Self-esteem: Research, theory, and practice: Toward a positive psychology of self-esteem (3rd ed.). E-book. New York: Springer Publishing Company. Retrieved from La Trobe University Library, Melbourne http://library.latrobe.edu.au/search~S5?/aMruk%2C+Christopher+J./amruk+christopher+j/1%2C1%2C3%2CB/frameset&FF=amruk+christopher+j&3%2C%2C3Google Scholar
National Family Preservation Network. (n.d.). Values and beliefs about IFP. Retrieved from http://www.nfpn.org/preservation/what-is-iFP.htmlGoogle Scholar
National Family Preservation Network (2012). What is IFP? Retrieved from http://www.nfpn.orgGoogle Scholar
Pecora, P., Fraser, M., Bennett, R., & Haapala, D. (1991). Placement rates of children and families served by the intensive family preservation services’ programs. In Fraser, M., Pecora, P. & Haapala, D. (Eds.), Families in crisis: The impact of Intensive Family Preservation Services (pp. 149–180). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2006). Sowing the seeds of innovation child protection, Monograph Series, No. 6 (pp. 1–22). Centre for Excellence in Child Welfare. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Tierney, L. (1963). Children who need help: A study of child welfare policy and administration in Victoria. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, E., & Dodini, A. (1999). Intensive in-home family-based services: Reactions from consumers and providers. Family Preservation Journal, 4 (2), 39–51.Google Scholar