Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:52:39.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age-Friendly Rural Communities: Conceptualizing ‘Best-Fit’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2013

Norah Keating ,
Jacquie Eales  and
Judith E. Phillips
Norah Keating*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta
Jacquie Eales
Affiliation:
Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta
Judith E. Phillips
Affiliation:
Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University
*
†Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être addressees: Norah Keating, Ph.D. Department of Human Ecology 3-02 Human Ecology Building University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G 2N1 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on age-friendly communities is predominantly focused on a model of urban aging, thereby failing to reflect the diversity of rural communities. In this article, we address that gap by focusing on the concept of community in a rural context and asking what makes a good fit between older people and their environment. We do this through (a) autobiographical and biographical accounts of two very different geographical living environments: bucolic and bypassed communities; and through (b) analysis of the different needs and resources of two groups of people: marginalized and community-active older adults, who live in those two different rural communities. We argue that the original 2007 World Health Organization definition of age friendly should be reconceptualized to explicitly accommodate different community needs and resources, to be more inclusive as well as more interactive and dynamic, incorporating changes that have occurred over time in people and place.

Résumé

La littérature sur les communautés amies des aînés est axé principalement sur un modèle de vieillissement en un milieu urbain, en omettant ainsi de refléter la diversité des communautés rurales. Dans cet article, nous abordons cette lacune en se concentrant sur la notion de la communauté dans un contexte rural et en demandant ce qui crée une bonne adaptation entre les personnes âgées et leur environnement. Cela se fait grace à (1) comptes autobiographiques et biographiqus de deux environnements géographiques très différents de subsistence: les communautés bucoliques et contournées, et à (b) l’analyse des besoins et des ressources différents des deux groupes de personnes: les personnes âgées marginalisées et actives qui vivent dans ces deux communautés rurales différentes. Nous affirmons que la définition originale de 2007 de l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS), de “amie des aînés” doit être repensée pour tenir compte des besoins et ressources explicitement différents de la communauté, pour être plus inclusive ainsi que plus interactive et dynamique en intégrant les changements qui sont survenus au fil du temps chez les personnes et les lieux.

Keywords

agingage-friendly communitycommunity diversityperson-environment fitrural communitiesvieillissementcommunauté amie des aînésdiversité de la communautél’ajustement de la personne à l’environnementcommunautés rurales
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 319 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors gratefully acknowledge the joint funding received from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant CIHR CUK 94355, Connectivity of Older Adults in Rural Communities: Health in Context) and the UK New Dynamics of Ageing Programme (RES-353-25-0011, Grey and Pleasant Land?: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Connectivity of Older People in Rural Civic Society), as part of the Canada-UK Aging Initiative, which facilitated the transnational collaboration needed to write this article. The data were collected as part of a program of research funded by Veterans Affairs Canada (PWGSC Contract #51019-017032/001/HAL, Caring Contexts of Rural Seniors).

References

Alcock, D., Angus, D., Diem, E., Gallagher, E., & Medves, J. (2002). Home care or long-term care facility: Factors that influence the decision. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 21(2), 35–48.Google Scholar
Bowles, R. T., Beesley, K. B., & Johnston, C. (1994). Retiree migrants to a small Ontario community: Service utilization, social participation, and community attitudes. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2002). Historic Cumberland County South: Land of promise. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Nimbus Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, D. L., & Glasgow, N. (2008). Rural retirement migration. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Buffel, T. (2012). Experiences of place and neighbourhood in later life: Developing age friendly communities. Brussels: VUB Press.Google Scholar
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617. doi: 10.1177/0261018311430457.Google Scholar
Burholt, V., & Dobbs, C. (2012). Research on rural ageing: Where have we got to and where are we going in Europe? Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 432–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier-Fisher, D., & Harvey, J. (2009). Home beyond the house: Experiences of place in an evolving retirement community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 246–255.Google Scholar
Cloutier-Fisher, D., & Kobayashi, K. (2009). Examining social isolation by gender and geography: Conceptual and operational challenges using population health data in Canada. Gender, Place and Culture, 16(2), 181–199.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., Rathwell, T. A., & Rosenberg, M. W. (2005). Service provision for seniors: Challenges for communities in Atlantic Canada. Longwoods Review, 3(3), 9–16.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P., & Hardill, I. (2011). Promoting social inclusion? The impact of village services on the lives of older people living in rural England. Ageing and Society, 31(2), 243–264.Google Scholar
Eales, J., Keefe, J., & Keating, N. (2008). Age-friendly rural communities. In Keating, N. (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? (pp. 109–120). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Federal/Provincial/Territorial Ministers Responsible for Seniors. (n.d.). Age-friendly rural and remote communities: A guide. Retrieved 3 September 2013 fromhttp://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/alt-formats/pdf/publications/public/healthy-sante/age_friendly_rural/AFRRC_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Giarchi, G. (2006). Older people “on the edge” in the countrysides of Europe. Social Policy and Administration, 40(6), 705–721.Google Scholar
Gilliard, C., Higgs, P., & Rees-Jones, I. (2011). Community and connectivity in the 3rd age: From fixity to fluidity. Paper presented at the Gerontological Society of America annual conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Glorioso, R., & Moss, L. A. (2007). Amenity migration to mountain regions: Current knowledge and a strategic construct for sustainable management. Social Change, 37(1), 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golant, S. (2004). The urban-rural distinction in gerontology: An update of research. In Wahl, H-W., Scheidt, R., & Windley, P., (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on ageing in context: Socio-physical environments, Vol. 23 (pp. 280–319). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Haggett, P., Cliff, A., & Frey, A. (1977). Locational models. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanlon, N., Clasby, R., Halseth, G., & Pow, V. (2007). The place embeddedness of social care: Restructuring work and welfare in Mackenzie, BC. Health & Place, 13(2), 466–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanlon, N., & Halseth, G. (2005). The greying of resource communities in northern British Columbia: Implications for health care delivery in already-underserviced communities. The Canadian Geographer, 49(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Houle, L., Salmoni, A., Pong, R., Laflamme, S., & Viverais-Dresler, G. (2001). Predictors of family physician use among older residents of Ontario and an analysis of the Andersen-Newman behavior model. Canadian Journal on Aging, 20(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar
Iwarsson, S. (2005). A long-term perspective on person-environment fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. The Gerontologist, 45(3), 327–336.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. (2008). Ecological systems and complexity theory: Toward an alternative model of accountability in education. Complicity, An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 5(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Joseph, A. E., & Cloutier-Fisher, D. (2005). Ageing in rural communities: Vulnerable people in vulnerable places. In Andrews, G. & Phillips, D. R. (Eds.), Ageing and place: Perspectives, policy and practice (pp. 133–155). London: Routledge Studies in Human Geography.Google Scholar
Joseph, A. E., & Skinner, M. (2012). Volunteerism as a mediator of the experience of growing old in evolving rural spaces and changing rural places. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N., & Eales, J. (2011). Diversity among older adults in rural Canada: Health in context. In Kulig, J. & Williams, A. (Eds.), Rural health: A Canadian perspective (pp. 427–446). Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Keating, N., & Phillips, J. E. (2008). A critical human ecology perspective on rural ageing. In Keating, N. (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? (pp. 1–10). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Keating, N., Swindle, J., & Fletcher, S. (2011). Aging in rural Canada: A retrospective and review. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 323–338.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. (1980). Environment and aging. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers.Google Scholar
Lui, C-W., Everingham, J-A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menec, V., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G., & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 479–493.Google Scholar
Moore, E. G., & Pacey, M. A. (2004). Geographic dimensions of aging in Canada, 1991-2001. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23(1 Suppl), S5–S21.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Peace, S., Wahl, H-W., Mollenkopf, H., & Oswald, F. (2007). Environment and ageing. In Bond, J., Peace, S., Dittman-Kohli, F., & Westerhof, G. (Eds.), Ageing in society (pp. 209–234). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Peace, S., Holland, C., & Kellaher, L. (2011). Option recognition in later life: Variations in ageing in place. Ageing and Society, 31(5), 734–757.Google Scholar
Philip, L. J., Gilbert, A., Mauthner, N., & Phimister, E. (2003). Scoping study of older people in rural Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C., Bernard, M., Phillips, J., & Ogg, J. (2000). The family and community life of older people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. (2011). Developing age-friendly communities: New approaches to growing old in urban environments. In Settersten, R. & Angel, J. (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 279–297). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rozanova, J., Dosman, D., & de Jong Gierveld, J. (2008). Participation in rural contexts: Community matters. In Keating, N. (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? (pp. 75–86). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Scharf, T., & Bartlam, B. (2008). Ageing and social exclusion in rural communities. In Keating, N. (Ed.), Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? (pp. 97–108). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Scharf, T., Liddle, J., Bartlam, B., Bernard, M., & Sim, J. (2012). How age-friendly are purpose-built retirement communities? Towards a conceptual and empirical understanding of age-friendliness [Abstract]. Proceedings of the British Society of Gerontology 41st Annual Conference, Keele University, Keele, UK, 69. Retrieved fromhttps://www.keele-conferencemanagement.com/KEELE/media/uploaded/EVKEELE/event_47/Full%20Abstract%20Document%20for%20Website.pdf.Google Scholar
Shucksmith, M. (2003). Social exclusion in rural areas: A review of recent research. London: Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. W., Yantzi, N. M., & Rosenberg, N. W. (2009). Neither rain nor hail nor sleet nor snow: Provider perspectives on the challenges of weather for home and community care. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 682–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Canada. (2002). 2001 community profiles. Retrieved July 27, 2012, fromhttp://www.statcan.ca/bsolc/english/bsolc?catno=93F0053X.Google Scholar
Turcotte, M., & Schellenburg, G. (2007). A portrait of seniors in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Industry. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-519-x/89-519-x2006001-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Wahl, H-W., & Lang, F. (2004). Ageing in context across the adult life course: Integrating physical and social environmental research perspectives. In Wahl, H.-W., Scheidt, R., & Windley, P. (Eds.) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on ageing in context: Socio-physical environments, Vol. 23 (pp. 1–34). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Walsh, K., O’Shea, E., & Scharf, T. (2012). Social exclusion and ageing in diverse rural communities: Findings of a cross-border study in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, National University of Ireland Galway. ISBN: 978-1-908358-03-5.Google Scholar
Walsh, K., O’Shea, E., Scharf, T., & Murray, M. (2012). Ageing in changing community contexts: Cross-border perspectives from rural Ireland and Northern Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(4), 347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.012.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Retrieved 23 May 2012 fromhttp://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2009). WHO Global network of age-friendly cities. Retrieved 22 May 2012 fromhttp://www.who.int/ageing/Brochure-EnglishAFC9.pdf.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2013). What is “active ageing”? Retrieved September 3, 2013, from: http://www.who.int/ageing/active_ageing/en/index.html.Google Scholar