We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Blakemore, Diane. 1989. Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but. Linguistics and Philosophy12:15–38.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blass, Regina. 1990. Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooley, Ralph. 1983. Codes and contexts: An argument for their description. In Intercultural Communication Theory: Current perspectives, ed. Gudykunst, William, 241–251. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Davis, Steven. 1991. Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1983. Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, ed. Eco, Umberto and Sebeok, Thomas, 198–220. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and relevance — Communication and context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1982. The speech communication model in 20th-century linguistics and its sources. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, August 29-September 4, 1982, Tokyo, ed. Hattori, Shiro, Inoue, Kazuko, Simomiya, Tadao, and Nagashima, Yoshio, 864–869. Tokyo: Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kess, Joseph. 1993. Review of Steven Davis, Pragmatics: A reader. Canadian Journal of Linguistics38:454–456.Google Scholar
Mura, Susan. 1983. Licensing violations: Legitimate violations of Grice’s conversational principle. In Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy, ed. Graig, Robert and Tracey, Karen, 101–115. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language4:295–329.Google Scholar
Romney, Claude. 1993. Review of Ernst-August Gutt, Translation and relevance — Communication and context. Canadian Journal of Linguistics38:110–113.Google Scholar
Rundquist, Suellen. 1990. Indirectness in conversation: Flouting Grice’s maxims at dinner. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16-19, 1990: General Session and Parasession on the Legacy of Grice, ed. Hall, Kira, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Meachem, Michael, Reinman, Sondra, and Sutton, Laurel, 509–518. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Conversation and Discourse, ed. Werth, Paul, 155–178. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1987. Précis of Relevance (plus open peer commentary and authors’ response). The Behavioral and Brain Sciences10:697–754.Google Scholar