Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:10:34.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Liberalism and Cultural Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2015

Margaret Moore
Get access

Extract

One of the most important and divisive issues facing heterogeneous or culturally diverse states—and most states are culturally diverse—is the relation between these different cultures and the state.

This question was raised initially in contemporary liberal political philosophy in terms of the fruitful debate between liberals and communitarians. Sandel, for example, criticized Rawls’s A Theory of Justice and, by extension, all liberal theories for falsely abstracting from conceptions of the good, abstracting from culturallyspecific conceptions, and grounding his liberal principles in terms of an abstract Kantian individualism. Liberal theorists countered by complaining that communitarians falsely conceived of a single homogeneous community. Although Rawls’s revised defense of liberal justice in his 1993 book Political Liberalism does not refer directly to the liberal-communitarian debate, nevertheless, his new grounding of liberal political principles, as principles which would be acceptable to individuals with diverse conceptions of the good, seems to justify liberal principles in terms of contemporary conditions, and, at the same time, challenges the relevance of those theories which appeal to any notion of a homogeneous ‘community’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , July 1995 , pp. 297 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sandel, M Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

2. Kymlicka, W Liberalism, Community, and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989) at 78–79.Google Scholar

3. Rawls, J Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) at 36.Google Scholar

4. Ibid, at 54-55.

5. Barry, B Theories of Justice (London: Harvester- Wheatsheaf, 1989) at 275.Google Scholar

6. Supra note 3 at 24.

7. Ibid, at 24.

8. Ibid, at 5.

9. Ibid, at 4.

10. Moore, M “Justice for Our Times” (1990) 23:3 Can. J. of Poli. Sci. 459 at 482.Google Scholar

ll. Supra, note 3 at 50-51.

12. Ibid, at 54.

13. Ibid, at 54.

14. Ibid, at 52.

15. Ibid, at 52.

16. Ibid, at 85-86.

17. Connor, W Ethnonationalism: the Quest for Understanding (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994) at 48–50.Google Scholar

18. Connor, W The National Question in Marxist-Leninist Theory and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984) at 209209–11, 305.Google Scholar

19. Supra note 3 at 12.

20. Ibid, at 12.

21. Margalit, A & Raz, J “National Self-Determination” (1990) 87 J. of Phil. 440.Google Scholar

22. McGarry, J & O’Leary, B The Future of Northern Ireland (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar

23. Narveson, J “Rawls, Liberalism and Equality” (Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, 1994) [unpublished] at 5.Google Scholar

24. lbid. at 5.

25. Supra note 2 at 195-97.

26. Cardinal, H The Unjust Society (Edmonton, Alberta: Hurtig, 1969) at 1.Google Scholar

27. Berger, T A Long and Terrible Shadow (Vancouver, BC: Douglas & Mclntyre, 1991) at 107–09.Google Scholar

28. Supra note 3 at 85-86.

29. See supra note 22.

30. Supra note 5; Darwall, S Impartial Reason (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983) at 13–21.Google Scholar

31. Dunn, J Political Theory in the Face of the Future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979) at 55.Google Scholar

32. Tamir, Y Liberal Nationalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993) at 148.Google Scholar