No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2009
page 25 note 215 See pp. 76 and 165.
page 26 note 216 Edmund Archer, described as a cordwainer (see pp. 164–5); and John Pert and John Wroxham, described as souters (see pp. 172 and 189).
page 26 note 217 John Pert (see p. 75).
page 26 note 218 Edmund Archer (see pp. 76 and 164–5).
page 26 note 219 William Baxter (see pp. 39, 47–8, 50 and 179).
page 26 note 220 See pp. 41–51, 75 and 138–44.
page 26 note 221 See map (p. 27).
page 26 note 222 See pp. 182 and 185.
page 26 note 223 Tanner, N. P., ‘Popular Religion in Norwich with special Reference to the Evidence of Wills, 1370–1532’ (unpublished Oxford D.Phil, thesis, 1973), pp. 305–11.Google Scholar
page 26 note 224 Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar
page 26 note 225 Ibid., pp. 20–47.
page 26 note 226 Ibid., pp. 100–16.
page 26 note 227 See Table 2 (p. 11).
page 26 note 228 Lambeth Palace Library, Register of Archbishop Warham (1503–12), fos. 159r–v and 169v–171v.
* The numbers indicate how many defendants came from each place. In a few cases the place cannot be identified with certainty. These cases are noted in the footnotes to the text.
page 28 note 229 See p. 75.
page 28 note 230 See pp. 73–6.
page 28 note 231 See p. 75.
page 28 note 232 See pp. 140, 176 and 179.
page 28 note 233 See p. 47.
page 28 note 234 See pp. 43–51.
page 28 note 235 See p. 74.
page 28 note 236 See pp. 208–9 and 217.
page 28 note 237 See pp. 60 and 66.
page 28 note 238 See pp. 33, 146 and 218.
page 28 note 239 See pp. 146 and 152–3.
page 28 note 240 See p. 146.
page 28 note 241 I am indebted to Dr Hudson for this point and for most of the examples.
page 28 note 242 e.g., pp. 140 and 153.
page 28 note 243 See pp. 45–6.
page 28 note 244 See pp. 141–2.
page 28 note 245 See pp. 81 and 147.
page 28 note 246 See p. 146.
page 28 note 247 e.g., pp. 74 and 78.
page 28 note 248 See p, 147.
page 28 note 249 Hudson, , ‘A Lollard Compilation’, 80Google Scholar; ‘Some Aspects of Lollard Book Production’, Studies in Church History, ix (ed. Baker, D., Cambridge, 1972), 148 and 156–7.Google Scholar
page 29 note 250 See pp. 39, 41, 47–8, 60, 69, 75, 99 and 102.
page 29 note 251 See p. 100.
page 29 note 252 Foxe, , ActsGoogle Scholar, Book 6 (ed. Pratt, iii, p. 597). It is difficult to know whether Foxe distorted the evidence through wishful thinking, as he did in several other cases (see above, p. 8, n. 47, and p. 20).
page 29 note 253 See p. 7.
page 29 note 254 Thomson, , Later Lollards, p. 130.Google Scholar
page 29 note 255 See pp. 12, and 15–16.
page 29 note 256 See pp. 64, 72, 75–6, 104–5 and 165.
page 29 note 257 See p. 73.
page 29 note 258 See pp. 73, 89–90 and 217–18.
page 29 note 259 See pp. 26 and 28.
page 29 note 260 See under his name in the Index.
page 29 note 261 See p. 140, n. 164.
page 30 note 262 Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 173–6Google Scholar; Reg. Chichele, ed. Jacob, iii, pp. 85 and 199, and iv, pp. 297–301Google Scholar; see above, pp. 7–8, and under their names in the Index.
page 30 note 263 Thomson, , Later Lollards, p. 2.Google Scholar
page 30 note 264 See p. 185.
page 30 note 265 See p. 75.
page 30 note 266 See p. 20.
page 30 note 267 See p. 1, n. 14, and p. 75, n. 100.
page 30 note 268 McFarlane, , Wycliffe, p. 187.Google Scholar
page 30 note 269 For the only possible evidence in the manuscript to the contrary, see p. 90, n. 121, and p. 99, n. 132.