Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2009
page 22 note 177 See pp. 39–40, 192–3, 201 and 210–16.
page 22 note 178 See pp. 99–102.
page 22 note 179 See p. 8.
page 22 note 180 McFarlane, , Wycliffe, p.150Google Scholar; Reg Chichele, ed. Jacob, i, pp. cxxxiv–cxxxv.Google Scholar
page 22 note 181 See pp. 183–6.
page 22 note 182 See pp. 43–51.
page 22 note 183 See p. 42.
page 22 note 184 See p. 208.
page 22 note 185 See pp. 35–8, 80, 83 and 168.
page 23 note 186 e.g., pp. 197 and 204.
page 23 note 187 See pp. 35–8, 78, 188 and 206.
page 23 note 188 e.g., pp. 197–8 and 200.
page 23 note 189 e.g., p. 124.
page 23 note 190 e.g., p. 162.
page 23 note 191 See pp. 40, 56, 66, 68, 105, 107, no, 150–1, and 192.
page 23 note 192 e.g., pp. 56 and 119.
page 23 note 193 e.g., pp. 151 and 156.
page 23 note 194 See pp. 90–2 and 106–7.
page 24 note 195 Probably imprisonment for seven years, but possibly imprisonment for a period of time each year for seven years.
page 24 note 196 See pp. 56 and 63.
page 24 note 197 Thomson, , Later Lollards, pp. 231–5.Google Scholar
page 24 note 198 See p. 188.
page 24 note 199 See pp. 56, 63–4, 104–5 and 209.
page 24 note 200 See pp. 56 and 63.
page 24 note 201 See pp. 110, 118–19, 124, 129–30 and 138.
page 24 note 202 See p. 132.
page 24 note 203 See p. 181.
page 24 note 204 See p. 76.
page 25 note 205 See pp. 25–6 and 28. For similar cases of leniency being exercised out of regard for social position, see Bowker, M., The Secular Clergy in the Diocese of Lincoln, 1495–1520 (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 35–6.Google Scholar
page 25 note 206 See p. 200.
page 25 note 207 e.g., p. no.
page 25 note 208 See pp. 194–5.
page 25 note 209 See p. 188.
page 25 note 210 See pp. 188–9.
page 25 note 211 Edmund Archer and John Pert.
page 25 note 212 See pp. 35–8 and 83–4.
page 25 note 213 See p. 174.
page 25 note 214 See p. 78.