Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:19:21.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPLIED TERMS: THE JOURNEY OF THE MAN ON THE CLAPHAM OMNIBUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2011

John McCaughran
John McCaughran
Affiliation:
QC, One Essex Court; Bencher of Gray's Inn.
Get access

Extract

This article is about the implication of terms into contracts based upon the presumed intention of the parties. It is particularly concerned with the decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Attorney General of Belize v. Belize Telecom Limited,1 a number of recent Court of Appeal decisions thereafter, and whether there has been any change in the law. Before getting to Belize, it is necessary to consider, as briefly as possible, what went before.

Type
Articles
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 607 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 [2009] UKPC 10, [2009] 1 W.L.R. 1988.

2 (1889) L.R. 14 P.D. 64.

3 [1918] 1 K.B. 592.

4 [1939] 2 K.B. 206.

5 See, for example, the discussion of this in the speeches of Lord Cross of Chelsea and Lord Edmund-Davies in Liverpool City Council v. Irwin [1977] A.C. 239 at p. 258 (Lord Cross of Chelsea), and p. 266 (Lord Edmund-Davies).

6 [1977] A.C. 239.

7 [1976] Q.B. 319, 330.

8 Holdsworth Club Lecture, University of Birmingham 1935, cited at [1976] Q.B. 319,330.

9 [1995] E.M.L.R. 472.

10 Per Rix L.J. in Socimer Bank Limited v. Standard Bank Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 116.

11 [1998] 1 W.L.R. 896.

12 [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 A.C. 1101; R. Buxton, “‘Construction’ and Rectification after Chartbrook” [2010] C.L.J. 253.

13 [1985] A.C. 191.

14 [2002] 1 A.C. 408.

15 Ibid., p. 459.

16 [2009] UKPC 10.

17 Ibid., para. [16].

18 Ibid., para. [25].

19 [1903] 2 K.B. 100.

20 [1933] 1 K.B. 205.

21 [1956] A.C. 696, 728.

22 See the speech of Lord Edmund-Davies, [1977] A.C. at p. 266.

23 See the speech of Lord Pearson, ibid., at pp. 609–610, and of Lord Cross of Chelsea at pp. 613–614.

24 [2009] EWCA Civ 531, [2010] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 1.

25 [2010] EWCA Civ 538.

26 [2010] EWCA Civ 1444.

27 Ibid., para. [39].

28 [2011] EWCA Civ. 543.

29 Ibid., para. [36].

30 This is confirmed by Arden L.J. in Stena Line, ibid. at para. 44, where Her Ladyship said that the implications of Belize were “not wholly clear”.