Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:21:40.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

French mercenaries in the Habsburg-Ottoman war of 1593–1606: the desertion of the Papa garrison to the Ottomans in 16001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

C. F. Finkel
Affiliation:
Imperial College, London

Extract

The period from the late sixteenth century has been characterized in Ottoman historiography as one of fundamental change in the composition of the army. One of the features of this change was the gradual replacement of the tīmār-based cavalry force, to whom were awarded benefices in return for military service, by provincial levies able to use muskets (tüfenk), often hired only for the duration of a single campaign. Although the extent to which such changes were directly prompted by the supposedly superior technology which the Ottomans encountered when fighting the Habsburgs on their western borders remains open to further research, that there was a radical transformation which relied on the greatly increased use of firearms is beyond doubt.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Archival and manuscript sources

Istanbul

Başbakanlik ArŞivi (BBA):

KK = Kâmil Kepeci Tasnifi 254, 1879, 1885

MMD = Mâliyeden Müdeyver Defterler 788, 807, 827, 893, 2725.

MD = Mühimme Defterleri 83

D.BRZ 20649.

Topkapi Sarayi Kütüphanesi

Ahmet Ḥasanbegzade Tārīḥ-i āl-i ‘osmān, MS Bağdad Köşkü 207

London

Public Record Office (PRO)

SP State Papers 101/94.

Vienna

Haus-, Hof- u. Staatsarchiv (HHStA)

Türkische Urkunden 1600, VI.23-VII.2.

Österreichisches Nationalbibliothek

‘Abdülḳadir Efendi Veḳāyi’-i Tarīḥiyye. MS Mxt. 130

Other references

Anderson, M. S. 1988. War and society in Europe of the Old Regime. (Fontana History of European War and Society.) London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Aykut, Nezihi. 1980. ‘Hasan Beyzade Tarihi’ (3 vols). Ph.D. diss., Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters.Google Scholar
Barkan, O. L. 1954(a) ℈H.954–955 (1547–1548) mali yihna ait bir Osmanh bütçesi’, Iktisat Fakültesi Mecmuasi, 19: 219–76. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Barkan, O. L. 1954(b) ‘H.974–975 (M.1567-1568) mali yihna ait bir Osmanh bütçesi’, Iktisat Fakültesi Mecmuasi 19:277332. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Bennassar, Bartolome and Bennassar, Lucile. 1989. Les Chretiens d’Allah: L'histoire extraordinaire des renégats, xvi-xvii siècles. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Berindei, Mihnea. 1977. ‘La Porte ottomane face aux Cosaques zaporogues, 1600–1637‘, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 1/3:273307. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Canaye de Fresne, Philippe. 1635. Lettres et ambassade de Messire Canaye, Seigneur de Fresne… Vol. i. Paris: Richer.Google Scholar
Cayet, Pierre Victor Palma. 1838. Chronologie septenaire. Vol. II. Paris: Everat.Google Scholar
Finkel, Caroline. 1988. The administration of warfare: the Ottoman military campaigns in Hungary, 1593–1606. (Beihefte zur Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, Bd.14.) Vienna: VWGÖ.Google Scholar
Fisher, Alan. 1981. ‘Ottoman Crimea in the sixteenth century’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 5/2:135–70. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gedoyn, [?]. 1909. Journal et Correspondance de Gédoyn ‘Le Turc’, Consul de France à Alep, 1623-25, ed. A. Boppe. Paris: Plon-Nourrit.Google Scholar
Biron, Gontautde, Théodore. 1889. Ambassade en Turquie de Jean de Gontaut Biron, Baron de Salignac. (Archives Historiques de la Gascogne, fasc. 19.). Paris.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. 1985. War and society in renaissance Europe 1450-1620. “Fontana History of European War and Society.” London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Hammer-Purgstall, J. von. 1829, 1833. Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches. Vols. IV, IX. Pest: C. A. Hartleben.Google Scholar
Hurmuzaki, E. (ed.). 1886. Documente privatoare la istoria romanilor culese de Eudoxiu de Hurmuzaki. Suppl. 1, Vol. I. Bucharest: Academiei Romane.Google Scholar
Husson, [M.]. (n.d.). Discours véritable des choses qui se sont passees aux armées de Hongrie en ces dernières années mil cinq cens quatre vingt dix neuf six cens, six cens un, deux, trois et quatre. Angers: Anthoine Hernault.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1980. ‘Military and fiscal transformation in the Ottoman Empire, 1600-1700’, Archivum Ottomanicum, 6:283337. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1986. ‘Power relationships between Russia, the Crimea and the Ottoman Empire as reflected in titulature’, in (ed.) Ch., Lemercier-Quelquejay, G., Veinstein, S. E., Wimbush, Turco-Tatar past, Soviet present. Louvain-Paris: Editions Peters: 175211.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. Article ‘Imtiyazat’ in Encyclopedia of Islam (second edition).Google Scholar
Islam Ansiklopedisi. 1970. Vol. XI. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Basimevi.Google Scholar
Kātib, Çelebi. 1287/1870–71. Fezleke. Vol. I. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Khadduri, M. 1955. War and peace in the law of Islam. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Khevenhūller, F. C. 1722. Frantz Chrisloph Khevenhillers Annales Ferdinandeorum. Part 5. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Knolles, Richard. 1631. Generall Historie of the Turkes… London: Adam Islip.Google Scholar
Kohbach, Markus. 1981. ‘Der osmanische Historiker Topcilar Katibi ‘bdū’lqadir Efendi, Leben und Werk’, Journal of Ottoman Studies, 2:7596. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Krypjakevych, Ivan (ed.). 1908. Zherela do istorii Ukrainy-Rusi, 8: Materiialy do istorii ukraϊns'koi kozachyhyny, 1: Dokumenty po rik 1631. Lemberg: Naukove Tovarystvo imeni Sevcenka.Google Scholar
Lefaivre, A. 1902. Les Magyars pendant la domination ottomane. Vol. I. Paris.Google Scholar
Lowry, Heath. 1986. ‘The Ottoman Tahrir Defterleri as a source for social and economic history: pitfalls and limitations’. “Paper prepared for the fourth International Congress on the Social and Economic History of Turkey, 1071–1922. (Munich, 4–8 August 1986”.Google Scholar
Murphey, Rhoads. 1979. The functioning of the Ottoman Army under Murad IV (1623–39/1032–49): key to the understanding of the relationship between center and periphery in seventeenth-century Turkey (3 vols). Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Murphey, Rhoads. 1983. ‘The Ottoman attitude towards the adoption of Western technology: the role of the Efrenci technicians in civil and military applications’, in (ed.) J. L., Bacqué-Grammont and P., Dumont, Contributions à I'histoire économique et sociale de I'Empire ottoman. Louvain: Editions Peters: 287–98.Google Scholar
Na'Ima, Mustafa. 1280/1863–64. Tarih. Vols. I, II. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Orhonlu, C. 1970. Osmanli Tarihine ait Belgeler: Telhisler, 1597–1607. Istanbul: Istanbul Çniv. Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayinlan.Google Scholar
Ostapchuk, Victor 1989. ‘The Ottoman Black Sea frontier and the relations of the Porte with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Muscovy, 1622–28’. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Pakahn, Mehmet Zeki. 1971. Osmanli tarih deyimleri ve terimleri sÖzlüğü. Vol. III. Istanbul: Milli Eḡitim Basimevi.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey [1972] 1981. The army of Flanders and the Spanish Road, 1567-1659. “Cambridge Studies in Early Modern History.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pecevī, Ibrāhīm. 1283/1866–367. Tarih. Vol. II. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jan. 1985. ‘The Eğri Campaign of 1596: military history and the problem of sources’, in (ed.) A., Tietze, Habsburgisch-osmanische Beziehungen. Vienna: VWGÖ: 125–44.Google Scholar
Solakzade, Mehmed. 1297/1880. Tarih. Istanbul.Google Scholar
Stein, Joshua. 1986 [1988]. ‘A letter to Queen Elizabeth I from the Grand Vizīer as a source for the study of Ottoman diplomacy’, Archivum Ottomanicum, 11:231–47. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Thou, Jacques-Augustc de. 1734. Histoire universelle de Jacques-Auguste de Thou depuis 1543 jusqu'en 1607. Vol. XIII. London.Google Scholar
UzunçarŞili, I. H. 1943–44. Osmanli devleti teskilatindan kapukulu ocaklan (2 vols). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi.Google Scholar
Xivrey, Berger de. 1850, 1872. Recueil de lettres missives de Henri IV. Vols. V, VIII. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar