Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:54:48.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dr O'Hara replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter O'Hara
Peter O'Hara*
Affiliation:
St Loman's Hospital Dublin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , May 1986 , pp. 118 - 120
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1986

References

1. King, J. R. (1984) Must psychoanalysis be scientific? Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists 8, 152–153.Google Scholar
2. Flew, A. (1979) Dictionary of Philosophy London: Pan.Google Scholar
3. Bullock, A. & Stallybrass, O. (1977) The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought London: Fontana.Google Scholar
4. Hofstadter, D. R. (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
5. Fodor, J. A. (1975) The Language of Thought New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
6. Teichman, J. (1974) The Mind and the Soul London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.